On Apr 30, 2007, at 10:04 AM, CK wrote:
http://working.bushidodeep.com/dom_site/template.php
On Apr 29, 2007, at 10:23 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
as Paul mentioned: why the pointer over the dt/headings ?
At 4/29/2007 09:12 PM, CK wrote:
For Show/Hide Dom Switching
I strongly
I strongly suggest you
1) mark up the DTs as hyperlinks that reload the page with the selected
item expanded, then
2) add javascript that converts the links to show/hide DOM switches
That way the page will function correctly whether javascript is enabled or
not, and when javascript is enabled
CK wrote:
For Show/Hide Dom Switching
You may find this article useful:
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/toggle_elements.asp /plug
It is about using javascript to create the links and hide the DDs
(progressive enhancement).
See this http://working.bushidodeep.com/dom_site/template_02.php
There
On Apr 30, 2007, at 8:59 AM, Open Vision wrote:
To add my 2-cents:
1. What the heck is Fidelity(Chûgi)? You can't assume everyone
knows what this is. Plus there should be a space between Fidelity
and the open par...
Understood
2. Validation doesn't fit in the dropdown box.
Padding
On 4/30/07, CK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 30, 2007, at 8:59 AM, Open Vision wrote:
To add my 2-cents:
1. What the heck is Fidelity(Chûgi)? You can't assume everyone
knows what this is. Plus there should be a space between Fidelity
and the open par...
Understood
I know this isn't a
Finally, I think show/hide javascript for the explanations is
pointless... if I really happen to be interested enough to read all
the sections, I would have to go through 10 clicks. That's a lot of
work to read half a page worth of text. I say just let everything be
available on page load and
On Apr 30, 2007, at 2:28 AM, Paul Novitski wrote:
The method you're using to present the definition list in two
columns is to split the markup into two lists. However, I believe
it's really just one list, so you're changing the markup in a way
that misrepresents the semantics of the
This was the conclusion reached, thanks for the affirmation!
Ck
On Apr 30, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Finally, I think show/hide javascript for the explanations is
pointless... if I really happen to be interested enough to read all
the sections, I would have to go through 10
On Apr 30, 2007, at 2:28 AM, Paul Novitski wrote:
The method you're using to present the definition list in two
columns is to split the markup into two lists. However, I believe
it's really just one list, so you're changing the markup in a way
that misrepresents the semantics of the page
Sorry, but I still see a mess. Maybe worse than before as far as layout is
concerned. Text size, depending on how you have it set on your monitor is all
over the place. Columns aren't even (as a graphic designer this is a pet
peeve). And you have words underlined that aren't links. Misleading
Hello,
Does anyone have any experience floating HTML elements over Flash via
absolutely-positioned divs? I know that this is possible with the most
up-to-date browsers, but I'm not aware of how wise this is in terms of
backward-compatibility. Can anyone point to successful examples of this?
At 4/30/2007 02:02 PM, Open Vision wrote:
Spelling and punctuation is faulty too:
Using javascript and AJAX behaviour is added to enhance user
experience for a web applications, in compliance with web standards
Better written as; Javascript and AJAX behavior (oh, we don't use
the u here) is
Hi,
Not offended, solid critique, must have a thick skin in this
profession :) Send some screen captures please..
CK
On Apr 30, 2007, at 4:02 PM, Open Vision wrote:
Sorry, but I still see a mess. Maybe worse than before as far as
layout is concerned. Text size, depending on how you
I'm afraid I agree completely with Bill, on almost every point. See
below:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Open Vision
Subject: Re: [WSG] Template Review[Final]
Sorry, but I still see a mess. Maybe worse than before as far as layout
is concerned. Text size,
On Apr 30, 2007, at 5:23 PM, Chris Williams wrote:
I’m afraid I agree completely with Bill, on almost every point.
See below:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Open Vision
Subject: Re: [WSG] Template Review[Final]
Sorry, but I still see a mess. Maybe
List,
A sincere thanks for all the contributions, especially the last (2).
A rushed concept is both costly, and exhausting. Note to self
simplicity is not simple.
Several development steps where missed, not treating myself as a
client, being the most damaging. See you all after the
I recently came across two niggling CSS errors:
1)
body { background: url('image.gif')no-repeat top }
Here, the coder has left no whitespace after the URL in the shorthand
background declaration.
Firefox is OK with it, IE doesn't display the image.
2)
#right navbar
I will be out of the office starting 01/05/2007 and will not return until
04/05/2007.
I will respond to your message when I return. If your message is urgent,
please contact Lynette Brown at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
Royal Mail
wmode=transparent is something you want to look at
earlier versions of safari does not support that, also you have issues if
there is active content in the flash which competes for space with active
content in divs that over lap.
I would curb your enthusiasm as much as possible so as not to get
Hi.
got a assignment coming up, where i have to create a draft for a website,
and sighted people, would just draw it, using either pen or paper or use a
drawing program.
now, and my lecturer, says i can write a word document, with a table,
outlining the specifications.
now, my biggest problem,
Gday all,
I'm reading a paper from 1999:
Lie, Håkon Wium., 1999, Multipurpose Web Publishing Using HTML, XML and
CSS, Communications of the ACM, vol 42. no 10, p95
and have come across a paragraph that hints at conflicting ideology
early in the web's history and HTML specifications.
The
I'm currently on a project that requires me to use images for the
navigation to create the mouseover effect.
CSS File.
div#nav {
display:block;
width:100%;
height:28px;
background:
Forgot to say what the problem was.
all the links are not clickable.
Regards,
Sam
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL
It's CSS validator. It doesn't validate cross-browser
compatability or the logic (or existence of) of HTML tags.
Well perhaps your second point is valid (and well formed) but this
example:
body { background: url('image.gif')no-repeat top }
isn't just about cross-browser compatiblity.
24 matches
Mail list logo
