Has anyone got this to work?
Deans example works fine on-line, but I can't get it to work served up from my test server.
It would be nice if MS implemented this themselves.
From: Brendan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 8 March 2004 11:24:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [WSG] IE7 fixes
Hi,
I would consider removing the web standards notice completely or at
least to the end of the page. Some people might choose not to have (or
be) a web standard browser ( eg Lynx, Google).
I think there was a conversation about this issue recently on this
list, and you can read more here
x = self.innerWidth;
y = self.innerHeight;
I need to find the document width.. ie.. if the viewing screen is too
small I need to know the document size.. not the viewing size.
Document.body.clientWidth seems to work for internet explorer.. giving
me the correct sizes..
But
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Terrence Wood
Sent: Friday, 15 October 2004 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] How do I find the document width in ie and mozilla?
x = self.innerWidth;
y = self.innerHeight;
I need to find the document width.. ie
Hi Mike,
there are some combinations of CSS that cause IE/MAC to hang.
This page has more:
http://www.l-c-n.com/IE5tests/index.shtml
./tdw
On 1/10/04 4:38 PM, Mike Brown wrote:
Help!
This page:
http://morst.signify.co.nz/templates/ig3-template.asp
which validates as HTML 4.01 Strict, causes a
in fact (a little more specific) try here:
http://www.l-c-n.com/IE5tests/misc/#crash
On 1/10/04 5:29 PM, Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Friday, 1 October 2004 2:38 PM, Mike Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Help!
This page:
http://morst.signify.co.nz/templates/ig3-template.asp
Place holder text is only required for textarea and text input:
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-HTML-TECHS/#forms-specific.
The reasons are: it makes it easier to tab through inputs without having
to read/hear the entire form, and; some assistive technologies can't
find form's properly without it.
I honestly don't know which UA's have problems with inputs without
default text, but futher discussion of the WACG 1.0 until user
agents.. rules can be found at
http://www.juicystudio.com/tutorial/accessibility/interimsolutions.asp
The browser that parses out labels is Webbie. Download it and
Recently I posted a shorter be-nice-to-IE/MAC @media hack to another list.
There was an issue with the modified rule (and original rule using the
tantek hack) where the rules following the @media declaration were
delivered to NN4.
I have since developed this one line alternative which ensures
It's an XHTML issue...here the validation report from BBEdit:
Value of attribute onkeydown for element input is invalid; Value
needs entity encoding
(if(event.keyCode==9amp;amp;self.gfPop)gfPop.fHideCal();).
On 5/10/04 10:12 AM, Ted Drake wrote:
I'm having trouble getting a page to validate as
untested...but it should work.
function externalLinks()
if (!document.getElementsByTagName) return;
var anchors = document.getElementsByTagName(a);
for (var i=0; ianchors.length; i++)
if (anchor[i].getAttribute(rel) ==
external) { anchor[i].target = _blank; }
}
}
that's correct, it works by closing off the @media rule before my
original post also had a typo, it should have read:
@media all
{
/*\{*//*}**/
/* rules */
}
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On Oct 5, 2004, at 13:03, Natalie Buxton wrote:
This does indeed look like it could be useful, could
Is there a standard answer for Web standards, or what are your points
of view on this?
The fact that the target attribute has disappeared from XHTML speaks
volumes: don't open new windows.
Opening new browser windows is about annoying as blinking text, or
marquee text, and I can't think of a
There is a whole plethora of points against opening new windows... I am
really curious as to what your usability team, or anybody else, see as
the benfits of opening new windows.
./tdw
john wrote:
Some of my usability team are telling me that they prefer to have
external links going into a new
Thanks Wayne, appreciate the risk ;-)
What you are describing though is your personal preference for opening
new windows - which I am all in favour for. I prefer tabbed window
browsers myself and open alot of tabs - and therein lies my point.
Opening my own windows suits me and my workflow for
1. p id=q1question/p a href=anwserq1.htmlcheck out the answer
to question 1./a and in answerq1: a href=questions.html#q1return
to quiz/a
2. write the answers into the document server side when the form is
submitted and return it.
3. If the quiz relies on js then write the answer in using the
Ryan, you have put forward a lot of ideas, but I can't help but thinking
that the examples you provide make a stronger case for the counterpoint
to the argument you are trying to make.
Ryan Nichols wrote:
The reason you would want to usa a 'popup' is for contextual
information. Usually this is
On 7/10/04 4:15 AM, Ryan Nichols wrote:
Here, I'll bring in the help of an expert. Excellent book, 'The Design
of Sites' by Douglas Duyne, James Landay, and Jason Hong. Quote is from
the section on Process Funnels.
I have this book, and as a formal collection of design patterns it's a
fantastic
Thanks for you contribution to this discussion Ryan, my apologies if you
felt 'got at' in any way by me... it certainly was a lively debate, and
it was great that you voiced your opinion with such enthusiasm.
cheers
./tdw
On 7/10/04 1:26 PM, Ryan Nichols wrote:
I'm intitially responded to a
I think you are correct in your assessment that opening a new window is
a behavior of the UA, and therefore (arguably) should not be included in
the DTD that describes the structure of a document.
Having said all that Chris's solution of having extended and published
the DTD is perfectly
Multiple labels for a single form control is valid HTML, however a
single label for multiple form controls is not:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/forms.html#h-17.9
Steven, can you be more specific about the barriers multiple labels present?
TIA
./tdw
On 2004-10-22 2:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The short answer is no.
Dublin core is an initiative that introduces a standardized vocabulary
for resource (Web page) descriptions. So, unless metatags (of any
description) harm your ranking, then there is no way that DC tags in and
of themselves will.
It will probably be more helpful to
Just to be clear, there is no way that Dublin Core in and of itself will
harm a sites ranking. I am a big fan of it myself.
Used properly, DC tags may or may not improve your ranking, but they
will not harm it either.
However, an SEO strategy that overloads meta tags with the same words,
You are correct, you can not use a strict XHTML doctype if you want to
use the target attribute. You can use transitional XHTML.
./tdw
On 2004-10-26 3:44 PM, John Horner wrote:
Isn't that what XHTML-1.0-Frameset is for??
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#a_dtd_XHTML-1.0-Frameset
Well no, the
frames, iframes and targets become modules in XHTML 1.1. So they will
still be around, but not in the core XHTML DTD.
A brief overview of XHTML and modules can be found here:
http://www.juicystudio.com/tutorial/xhtml/index.asp
./tdw
On 2004-10-26 5:28 PM, Nick Lo wrote:
I had the same question
congrats! I like your car analogy...
./tdw
Jason Foss wrote:
Greetings!
I penned a bit of a summary of some of the things I learned at WE04,
and Sitepoint have published it!
http://www.sitepoint.com
or straight to the article:
http://www.sitepoint.com/article/essentials-modern-web-design
Did I
Hi Aaron,
Welcome to the list. I'm about to disagree with your
, please don't take it personally, it's just another POV =).
skip navigation may be convention, but apparently the preference of
actual screen reader users is main content or similar (based on some
research I have read and user
Thanks Steven, this is a great resource.
cheers, Terrence Wood.
On 2004-11-01 12:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting observational study of screen reader users (PDF
you're floating the textarea:
remove this declaration from the CSS:
form#application div.row textarea
cheers Terry
On 2004-11-15 10:05 AM, Mike Brown wrote:
Hi
Safari (1.2.4) has a problem with the layout of this form:
http://dev5.signify.co.nz/templates/form.html
All other tested browsers render
Interesting question.
Slicing an image was a necessary part of creating a table based design
to ensure that the table cells aligned properly to preserve the design.
Designers sometimes used image slicing to improve the perceived
responsiveness of a site by providing some visual feedback that
In CSS 2.0 you would use:
img
{
page-break-inside: avoid;
}
if it were supported, but unfortunately AFAIK it isn't.
You can try:
#selected-img-that-breaks
{
page-break-before: always;
}
which should work, but you need to know ahead of time which image is
going to break your page.
./tdw
On
VLC http://www.videolan.org/vlc/ is a player that handles (most) wmv
movies and is available for a large number of platforms.
I'm not a video expert, but heres my understanding of the market:
1. wmv files are a MS propriety implementation of MPEG4.
2. Generally the files are considerably smaller
Most modern browsers set the default font to something equivalent to IE
default/medium font size: 16pt or 16px @96dpi it's kind of a field
leveler and fonts sizes are more likely to be similar cross platform,
and cross browser.
Setting a smaller % size on the body means, as a designer, you
spaced font by a pixel of two, and specify a minimum font-size of 9px if
my browser has the ability (try being a mac user where someones set a
font at 8px!).
cheers Terrence Wood.
David Laakso wrote:
Terrence,
Hold that thought. You're setting 62.5% on the body? Good grief man,
you've got
and 6 together and develop for a single IE box-model.
Are there any other benefits/limitations of doing this?
cheers Terrence Wood.
--
***
Are you in the Wellington area and interested in web standards?
Wellington Web Standards Group
where is proof to back up any of your sweeping generalisations
about users?
Obviously you are quite passionate about font sizing. I wonder why then
you assert font sizes for headings? Surely, you views about font
sizing must extend to any font not just the declaration on the body?
Terrence
have 10-15% of IE5 browsers, and in fact a couple of my
sites still see visits from IE 4.5. Though I have seen any real world
brwoser stats for around 6 months.
Terrence Wood.
Jeroen Visser [ vizi ] wrote:
It's really weird. On one side (Robert Scoble's IE wishlist entries)
developers are screaming
of the really poor
design on the web is created by developers because they know how to
publish content but they lack the above mentioned designer skill set.
(Do your own research on that one, for example google ASP)
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-11-19 10:58 AM, Natalie Buxton wrote:
Selectively quoting
and
presentation means that the content will probably stay in tact =).
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-11-19 1:02 PM, Ben Curtis wrote:
Font rescalability and sizing a font based on today's technology will be
useful on today's technology. But tomorrow is when it will be used.
Standards aren't just about helping
also look here: http://www.thenoodleincident.com/tutorials/box_lesson/font/
On 2004-11-19 1:02 PM, Ben Curtis wrote:
This has been an interesting, if heated, thread. I think a large part of
it revolves around being unable to measure people's default font size.
The arrogance vs. idealist portion
searching
through an online forum.
my 2 cents.
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-11-22 10:03 AM, Aaron Holbrook wrote:
Why not just create this kind of atmosphere in a forum, instead of an
email group?
Just a thought, people could check it on their own time - instead of
filtering through dozens of emails each
.
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-11-23 12:19 PM, Lachlan Hardy wrote:
john wrote:
I'm wondering if there's some easy (and free) way to convert text from
a WORD document into clean XHTML that retains the formatting.
If you have Dreamweaver, try using the 'Clean Up Word HTML Tool'. Then
'Convert to XHTML
I doubt it is a problem with FF. Most likely the server is not set up
correctly and is sending the file as text/plain not as text/html.
It works in IE because IE renders the document based on the file
extension not the header information and/or instruction from the server.
Terrence Wood
enclose your labels inside label tags so you can style
them properly- this will also help your accessibility. =)
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-11-25 8:50 AM, designer wrote:
Hi All,
I have designed a form as part of an ongoing upgrade to a site I manage, and
the form works fine in IE6, IE5.5, Firefox
describe accesskeys in an accessibility page, and don't bother
markingup or styling them in any way to exposed them to users. I use
content generation in my own user stylesheet to see them.
Using the title attribute to descibe the accesskey is a good idea.
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-11-25 12:43 PM
but inline and [hopefully] useful.)
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-11-25 2:19 PM, Paul Novitski wrote:
Since navigation presents a jargon problem, perhaps menu or another
less techie term might work:
Skip past menu
Jump over menu
What's an appropriate metaphor for a navigation menu if you're
quirks can generally be
avoided/minimized...
So you really need to tell the story of why your 'expensive' design is
so much better than you competitors cheap design when, with practice,
the methodology for producing a standards design is arguably the same as
a non-standards design.
Terrence
/webcontent/access.html
Another discussion:
http://www.corfield.org/coldfusion/accessibility.html
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-11-26 10:32 AM, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Terrence Wood wrote:
Just wanted to point out that flash satay does nothing to improve
accessibility. It only ensures validity
something work.
The list of web apps that don't open new windows is too numerous to
mention (any page where you login or search for something) but here's
one: google.com
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-11-26 4:09 PM, Priscilla Brice-Weller wrote:
On our website, we ask people to fill in a form to register
is questioned he says: I kicked
the pipe for free. I charged for knowing where to kick it.
This is how it is for design I think...
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-11-26 4:45 PM, Chris Stratford wrote:
Something I think you all are missing is that you have taken time to
learn about standards and accessibility
that rather than debate the pros and cons of font-sizing
again, anyone interested in this issue should search the list archive of
the last couple of weeks.
Terrence Wood
Michael Kear wrote:
I had this same problem a short while ago, and some listers might recall a
spirited exchange that occurred
://dean.edwards.name/IE7/
someone correct me if I'm wrong, but all these methods rely on
javascript being enabled.
Terrence Wood.
Chris Kennon wrote:
Hello All,
At the following url:
working.ckimedia.com/index.php
I've a nav ul that i would like to highlight, with a pencil underline
graphic, my
to be abstracted to such degree in markup. It's
unneccessarily pedantic IMHO.
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-11-30 10:15 AM, Lea de Groot wrote:
While
divlorem ipsum dolor emsit amet/em consectetur/div
would appear to have meaning
divemlorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur/em/div
would appear a little
yes, it is appropriate for a list of articles (but again, not the
article itself)... I think we're in agreement on that.
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-11-30 11:34 AM, Roger Johansson wrote:
On 29 nov 2004, at 22.58, Terrence Wood wrote:
While we can argue that the date, author and article name may well
kkk!! Are you saying that expressions in CSS don't work with IE6
SP2??? And, What does H.S. mean?
(no punctuation was seriously hurt in the creation ofthis email =) )
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-11-30 3:49 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Personally, I'd like to see max/min width/height implemented
Software)
# -atsc- (Advanced Television Standards Committee)
# -wap- (The WAP Forum)
# -k (or is it -khtml?) Safari, Konqueror.
cheers Terrence Wood.
On 2004-12-01 8:13 AM, Chris Kennon wrote:
Hi,
Would you explain the abbreviation IR and what is the name, and where
can I read about this rule:
a[href
The only problem I'm aware of is that you lose the ability to provide
feedback the a link has been activated.
If this is important then send IE it's own active rule:
* html a:active{}
cheers
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-12-01 4:50 AM, Derek Featherstone wrote:
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004 10:19 AM
Same results here for IE (similar set up) on my own test page, and I
don't see any bugs in Opera 7PC, 7.5MAC normal and SSR mode.
Opera's SSR is pretty aggressive and not many styles (if any) stick, so
the lack of :focus support in this mode is to be expected as a feature,
not a bug.
Terrence
two hack if you can do it:
* html {//stuff}for IE
/* \*/ {//stuff}/* */ to hide rules from Mac IE
HTH
Terrence Wood
On 2004-12-01 6:08 PM, Seona Bellamy wrote:
Hi guys,
I have a site I'm doing for a graphic designer friend of mine, and one of
the things I
in there too,
so make sure your proof read it again.
I second Jonathon's point about the use of tables... The code is DWMX,
not my cup of tea, but it works for some, say no more.
Terrence Wood.
Jonathan T. Sage wrote:
Ok - design critique. It's late, not looking at the code just yet.
Keep in mind
best ren voice
must resist feel a font debate coming on.. serif vs.
sans-serif. ughh!!! the pain!!!
/best ren voice
My 2 cents about people not really being interested in code. I disagree.
Totally. Good code for consumers [buzz-word for users not of the elicit
drug
A div is a block element, a span is an inline element as is an anchor.
An anchor cannot contain a block element, so nesting a div inside an a
will cause a validation error.
In this case a ref=link.htmlspanlink/span/a is correct.
cheers Terrence Wood.
On 2004-12-03 9:11 AM, Jonathan T. Sage
No, it is not correct. You need to read the spec.
Validators do not alert you if you have left form out, that's why it
seems like you can use form controls anywhere... but the real question
becomes why would you want to when there are so many other tags you can use.
Terrence Wood.
Cb2 Web
on your nav items.)
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-12-05 12:04 PM, Lea de Groot wrote:
On Sat, 04 Dec 2004 19:28:50 +, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Yes, it becomes a pain for those users who land on a page and
actually want to get to the navigation quickly. Particularly if
there's a lot of links and form
unless, of course, you are using a DTD that doesn't include
target=_blank, such as XHTML 1.0 strict or XHTML 1.0.
On 2004-12-07 8:07 AM, Matthew Cruickshank wrote:
Rather than a replacement it's best to include both,
a href=popup.html target=_blank onclick=window.open(...);return
falsepopup/a
duh me.
OK... I agree with you Mike =)
Terrence Wood.
russ - maxdesign wrote:
I agree with your thinking Russ... web standards are a means to an end
not the end itself. They represent a philosophy, framework or tool set.
Jut to clarify, that email was sent by me on behalf of Mike Brown, who
if you are using the w3c validator, try the advanced settings and
validate against the css3 profile. Which is where your selector comes
from, see: http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/CR-css3-selectors-2003/
Terrence Wood.
Ben Hamilton wrote:
The CSS file:
http://wallishamilton.com/code/screen.css
, and so
will present problems in the future (e.g. web safe color palette, use of
keywords for font-sizing, exemption required for xhtml).
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-12-08 7:32 AM, Joseph Lindsay wrote:
There is a lot of transparence around how govt agencies procure
services and the local 16year old
No there isn't. But the next release of of OS X will have one built in:
http://www.apple.com/accessibility/voiceover/
Terrence Wood.
Jorge Laranjo wrote:
But i don't know of any screenreader for MAC OS X. Is there any
AFAIK it's ok. You can also use transparent if you don't want a
background color.
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-12-09 8:08 AM, Lee Underwood wrote:
I know that if you declare the background-color, you also declare the
color (and vice-versa). Is it o.k. to use color: inherit; for the
color when you
I'll put something on my site. It's meant to have a blog there already,
but you know how it is a builder's house, a mechanic's car, a
designers site ;-)
So check in tomorrow at some stage.
http://funkive.com
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-12-09 8:42 AM, Joseph Lindsay wrote:
This probably goes
AFIAK it's safe to assume that robots will index and follow by default,
so this tag may be redundant.
Read more about robots here: http://www.robotstxt.org/wc/faq.html
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-12-14 9:14 AM, Barry Cranmer wrote:
If I have the following on my index page, do I need to repeat
to the server,
and pretty formatting in code source.
Using the first para of content is probably better suited to
description than keywords see:
http://www.highrankings.com/metadescription.htm
cheers
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-12-14 10:30 AM, John Ozturk wrote:
What if I create a conditional statement
, particularly where there are multiple pathways to the content.
For example, in a typical blog (with categories) there is always at
least two hierarchies that content lives in: the post date, and the
category.
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-12-15 10:42 AM, David Laakso wrote:
Why would I click return to when
The behaviour is correct, although my following eplanation may not be =-).
In xml body is just another tag -- the root element is html. When
sent as html the body tag is the root element. So when sending xml you
need to apply styles to html to style the entire viewport.
Terrence Wood.
On 2004
isn't the DWMX editor essentially homesite anyway? I'm a mac user so
I've never seen or used homesite.
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-12-16 2:39 PM, heretic wrote:
Realistically... we probably could have stuck with HomeSite :)
--
You know you've achieved perfection in design, not when you have
nothing
html and removing the id from the input field.
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-12-17 9:02 AM, Ted Drake wrote:
Can a form action cause a form field to grow? Here's a page that has a
similar form, look at the way it's input fields behave properly.
http://tcdpc/csa/contact-travel-insurance.do
Thanks for any
'inner content' is clear from the
gradient of your graphics.
[1] http://www.456bereastreet.com/lab/flexible_custom_corners_borders/
Terrence Wood.
Lori Leach wrote:
I have a design that am coding, and I need to make a css rounded corner
box with shadows INSIDE:
The box needs to look like:
http
the number of travellers
first, and then return that number of fields to get the ages?
Terrence Wood.
Andy Budd wrote:
On 12 Jan 2005, at 16:42, Ted Drake wrote:
I have tried hiding labels in the past.
Don't hide your labels. You may be able to trick bobby in giving you a
AAA rating but hiding
, or
with javascript disabled (like...aeh...search engines, for instance).
Terrence Wood.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
text-only and v4 browsers lack support for fieldsets, so one is really
stuck with using br / as the the leanest code solution.
Terrence Wood.
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
a slippery slope, in my opinion...starting to add what is, in this case,
visual markup to compensate for lack of CSS...
i
div's have no inherent dimensions and can be enclosed by fieldsets.
Terrence Wood.
Wayne Godfrey wrote:
If you add divs to the input fields, won't that effect the fieldset? Or am I
missing something here? I've been avoiding this form thing like the plague,
but I've got no choice now...gotta get
If the dimensions are included in CSS then it won't make a difference.
If you are using images judiciously (as opposed to gratuitously) then
the time to render them will be negligible.
I say if the attributes aren't deprecated and the code validates then
use them.
Terrence Wood.
[EMAIL
I think accesskeys are a case of: those who like them will find them,
those who don't can (and will) ignore them.
I use my user stylesheet to reveal accesskeys and tabindexes.
Terrence Wood.
The Bo$$ wrote:
CSS used, still accessible without.
I really don't think accesskeys are all that good
380k+ flash animation on the home page is just obnoxious... but
following that up with 220k+ on the next page... I'm lost for words.
Terrence Wood.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
... a pretty hefty price code-wise.
Terrence Wood.
john wrote:
I'm simply wondering about the grammatically-correct double space after
a period. For years, it's never mattered to me, but I have a client who
is a stickler for this sort of thing, and he asked if I could please add
the extra
It sounds like the IE6 session bug...in that case try adding:
header(Cache-control: private); // IE 6 Fix.
after a session_start() call if there is one, or anywhere before sending
output to the browser.
Terrence Wood.
Juha-Markku Liikala wrote:
Ok, problem solved...well kind of. I removed a my
Russ, isn't it NAV AFTER that is better for SEO, as the content is at
the top -- this leads to better keyword density, likliness of headings
being found etc?.
Terrence Wood.
russ - maxdesign wrote:
NAV BEFORE
* theoretically better for Search Engine Optimisation (as the content is at
the top
This post is on-topic.
The name attribute is deprecated on all elements except form controls.
So you can continue to use input name=foo type=text /, but you
can't do div name=bar.
Terrence Wood.
Darren Wood wrote:
Hey All...
Is the 'name' attribute depreciated in XHTML1.0 strict? If so how do i
some clarity when viewing the site without CSS and
improve navigation with screen readers.
Terrence Wood.
John Britsios wrote:
Please see here: http://www.webnauts.net/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
in sharing how he
gets his results so search his site with something like liquid layout
Terrence Wood.
Tom Livingston wrote:
Hi all,
General question for all you seasoned CSS gurus.
I was admiring stopdesign.com. I think it's a beautiful layout. But I am
having a problem wrapping my head around
is a programming
language that is complied and delivered as an application, Javascript is
a scripting language that is interpreted on the fly by web browsers.
Terrence Wood.
Bennie Shepherd wrote:
With java disabled in FF1 the drop downs appear as a long bulleted list
and of course everthing else
) != -1
currTag.getAttribute(title))
{
currTag.disabled = true;
if(currTag.getAttribute(title) == styleTitle)
{
currTag.disabled = true;
}
}
}
}
return true;
}
setStylesheet('noscript')
/script
Terrence Wood.
Golding, Antony wrote
Take a look at sIFR
http://www.mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2004/08/sifr
or look a flash satay:
http://allinthehead.com/retro/234/embedding-macromedia-flash-in-xhtml
Terrence Wood.
Ted Drake wrote:
Our marketing department sent me a postcard with fancy fonts and wanted to put
the entire image
business dealings?
Good content, updated regularly is the best SEO I know of. See:
http://www.penmachine.com/2004/08/is-it-worth-optimizing-your-site-for.html
Terrence Wood.
Chris Rizzo wrote:
laugh Well, I cetainly don't want to use techniques like this myself, but
there are clever ways to spam
Styling file input is inconsistent cross browser and platform here
is a work around:
http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/inputfile.html
Terrence Wood.
Irina Ahrens wrote:
Hello,
Does anybody knows how to set the width of a file input field in Firefox
so you can follow the line numbers as
reported, and it should all make sense.
You need to look at image replacement techniques.
see: http://www.google.com/search?q=css%20image%20replacement
Terrence Wood.
Zachary Hopkins wrote:
Any suggestions?
= Sample Code of my link
5.2+) have
an actively developed OS, and it's safe to assume that most users are
probably going to use Safari, Firefox or Opera.
Terrence Wood.
Joe Leech wrote:
I need to target
version 5.1 (OS9 ) separately from version 5.23 (OSX) as they seem to
have slightly different behaviors with regard
a self-referential
cite attribute, is that bad?
thanks in advance for your thoughts.
Terrence Wood.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
why? So that the summary is semantically different from the rest of the
content.
Terrence Wood.
Bert Doorn wrote:
Question: *why* do you want to use blockquote in the first place?
If it is purely for presentational purposes (indented block) I agree
that you are abusing the markup. Use CSS
1 - 100 of 350 matches
Mail list logo
