On 17/03/06, Jack Pivac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to put as many office divs as possible on a page, but
when that div is going to overlap onto a 2nd page I would like the whole
thing to be on the 2nd page, so the div isn't chopped in half.
Can anyone give me any pointers please?
URLs to expand
an answer by checking the URL 'hash' for the related question.
--
Rowan Walker
RMW Web Publishing
http://www.rmwpublishing.net
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
With regards to the demo; it would be nice to provide a few more
hooks (id's)
in the HTML so that it makes things easier to style with CSS alone.
eg.
ul id=photolinks
lia href=http://demo.cat-scan.net/photo/demo/03/; title=03
access=7#8592;/a/li
lia
Those coders that are knowingly writing invalid code (be it a trade off or
sheer laziness) should be honest with themselves and stop trying to kid their
viewers. Not only are you (like Nic said) weakening the value of the
button for
everyone but you will likely be found out (and to me - that
If that were your reasoning do you put a space at the end (or start) of
every paragraph? I wouldn't think so - I think the space is unnecessary.
I personally always put a carriage-return in my code after a br /
eg. 5. The cat isbr /
in the kitchen
Not only does it make the code more readably,
I'd remove all the ยป in each list item and replace this with an image on
the item bullet points.
Also adding a label and/or legend on the search field (and hiding it with
CSS if desired) would increase usability.
Personally I'd also 'no-repeat' the bg image as it doesn't look as good on
pages
Quite easily:
CSS:
#searchSubmit {
border: none;
background: url(filename.gif) no-repeat;
}
XHTML:
input type=submit id=searchSubmit /
Of course you will need to modify this to suit your site.
PS: the code you just showed is missing an equals sign ('=') in the 'name'
attribute. A
I think what Patrick is trying to say is you should us a submit button to
add some 'action' to your form. Currently it won't do anything unless you
add some JavaScript.
This will also further separate your content from presentation by moving
the styled image to your CSS (as a
I trying do solve a selector (see
http://css.maxdesign.com.au/selectutorial/selectors_type.htm) that I'm
not sure can even be solved (without changes to my HTML)
I am using a bottom border on links for easier reading (compared with
underlines), but only want the border to appear on text links
I have some tabular content (in the HTML as a table) but what it to
display as a list.
This works fine in Firefox by making each TD display as a 'block', but
does nothing in IE. Any ideas?
I do not want to do any static positioning as the table content
contains dynamic data. Would it be
I also had this problem recently and I also had no luck at finding some code
that I could rip. So I created my own (example):
style
#header_nav li {
float: left;
list-style-type: none;
}
#header_nav li a {
display: block;
width: 16px;
height: 26px;
}
#header_nav li span {
display: none;
}
Talking about NN4, it seems that the updated OptusNet Helpdesk (for those
O/S - Optus is .au's 2nd largest Telco) has started (not fully - still some
layout tables) to move to Web Standards and not bothered with NN4 prettiness
(the header fails). But the site seems to be doing something a
Isn't that what XHTML-1.0-Frameset is for??
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#a_dtd_XHTML-1.0-Frameset
- Original Message -
From: John Horner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 9:28 AM
Subject: [WSG] Target Attributes
| The last thing I want to do is
Again no disrespect - I too am all for easier maintenance on the server
side, but don't fall into the trap of thinking that your files will be
cached just because the URL doesn't change.
I have just made several requests to your site all the (index page) and each
time your CSS was downloaded
I to have been getting the same error even though I have been providing a
generic alternative.
After looking through my CSS over and over I noticed that I had 'mono'
instead of 'monospace'. Once fixed the CSS validated without warnings.
I then noticed that Dreamweaver MX 2004 (I only use
15 matches
Mail list logo
