Jeff D. Reid wrote:
I joined this list well over two years ago. I have designed sites on
my own utilizing tips and suggestions I have gathered from most
people on the list and other lists. This is the FIRST time I have
had my hands tied as to follow a Graphic Designer/Marketing expert
who
: Sunday, August 14, 2005 9:44 AM
Subject: RE: [WSG] Spacing Issue
Jeff D. Reid wrote:
I joined this list well over two years ago. I have designed sites on
my own utilizing tips and suggestions I have gathered from most
people on the list and other lists. This is the FIRST time I have
had
G'day
Thanks for the replies. I actually took a step back, re-evaluated the
suggestions I got and came up with this test page which appears to work:
http://www.olpguitars.com/index2.asp
The top links all work and I retained the graphic designer's sliced image.
oh yeah...it VALIDATES!
A
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2005 2:47 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Spacing Issue
G'day
Thanks for the replies. I actually took a step back, re-evaluated the
suggestions I got and came up with this test page which appears to work:
http
Jeff D. Reid wrote:
If you have an
idea of how to make the font size larger as to be readable yet not break the
table, please then by all means tell me.
http://www.olpguitars.com/index2.asp
This is one of many methods of setting relative font-sizes:
html, body{
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:24:13 +1000, Webmaster wrote:
Are we not being a bit classist?
(Coming in a little late here, guys - sorry!)
Classist not to offer constructive help for a non-standards based
implementation? I don't think so, for two main reasons:
1. The list is the web standards group,
.
- Original Message -
From: Jeff D. Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Spacing Issue
I am sorryhe says while walking away with his head hung in
shame...
I told them this would happen when trying
I have been working with these sliced images and occasionally run into this
issue. At the bottom right just below the footer info is a small area that
appears to have shifted somewhat. Can someone be so kind as to point me to
what is causing this?
obliged.
Best,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Peter Firminger
Sent: Friday, 12 August 2005 10:46 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Spacing Issue
Hmmm, back to the basics of this list.
Please read the section on Asking
On 12 Aug 2005, at 1:24 PM, Webmaster wrote:
Keep in mind that not many people here will want to help you sort out
a
design that uses tables for layout.
Are we not being a bit classist?
Not really. The name sums it up (web standards group) and using tables
for layout is not really in
Hi Paul,
Keep in mind that not many people here will want to help you
sort out a
design that uses tables for layout.
Are we not being a bit classist?
I don't think so. This is from the guidelines:
---
We encourage people to ask for help on the list. One of the primary goals of
this group
a div-based header/3-column/footer layout that is accessible.
http://www.google.com/search?q=3+column+accessible+css+layout
yields some good results...
Sadly not.
The search for a valid CSS/(X)HTML, hack-free, 3-column CSS layout
continues.
I'm still accepting offers for a solution. Even
Webmaster wrote:
Keep in mind that not many people here will want to help you sort
out a design that uses tables for layout.
Are we not being a bit classist?
Maybe ever so slightly, but I guess that comes naturally when one tries
to use standards as base for web design.
Although my current
: Thursday, August 11, 2005 8:45 PM
Subject: RE: [WSG] Spacing Issue
Hmmm, back to the basics of this list.
Please read the section on Asking for help on the list
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Validate your code.
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.olpguitars.com
The search for a valid CSS/(X)HTML, hack-free, 3-column CSS
layout continues.
I fear you are asking for the impossible, by requiring a 'hack-free'
solution. Until such time as all UA's are on a level playing field regarding
their implementation and interpretation of the standards hacks are
- Ignite Your Idea
www.fueladvance.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Webmaster
Sent: Friday, 12 August 2005 12:22 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Spacing Issue
a div-based header/3-column/footer layout
If there's a tradeoff between tables or two hacks I'll take the two hacks.
Hi Tatham,
Looks good. I'll ignore the 'get over it' and move to accept your suggestion
that a couple of hacks are acceptable. My only real issue with hacks is that
they are not future proof.
I see many sites not unlike
Advance - Ignite Your Idea
www.fueladvance.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Webmaster
Sent: Friday, 12 August 2005 12:53 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Spacing Issue
If there's a tradeoff between tables or two hacks
Webmaster wrote:
a div-based header/3-column/footer layout that is accessible.
http://www.google.com/search?q=3+column+accessible+css+layout
yields some good results...
Sadly not.
The search for a valid CSS/(X)HTML, hack-free, 3-column CSS layout
continues.
Did you see this one?:
The search for a valid CSS/(X)HTML, hack-free, 3-column CSS layout
continues.
Thierry wrote:
Did you see this one?:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/3cols/3cols/6.asp
Again, nice. But negative margins are not a solution I enjoy and IE still
requires scripting for height.
The good news is
20 matches
Mail list logo
