[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Smart smtpfwd

2008-02-28 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Harald Schneider wrote: I see - but it would be helpful to ignore and move th the next server in the list in some situations. That's a rather odd behaviour. A 5xx means NO, the operation will never succeed. If you put a server that gives a 5xx in front of another one

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Smart smtpfwd

2008-02-28 Thread Harald Schneider
Take e.g. this situation: A user has installed XMail as a proxy on his notbook. Now he moves to a country where the ISP blocks port 25 of the first server in the list. So he has to use an alternate config in his Outlook. Moving on to the next server in the list would be more comfortable. --

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Smart smtpfwd

2008-02-24 Thread Rob Arends
Of Harald Schneider Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 9:12 PM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: Feature Request: Smart smtpfwd I tested it with smtp.wanadoo.fr which gives a Relay denied and a working 2nd server. The mail was never forwarded to #2. -- Harald Davide Libenzi wrote

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Smart smtpfwd

2008-02-24 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Harald Schneider wrote: I tested it with smtp.wanadoo.fr which gives a Relay denied and a working 2nd server. The mail was never forwarded to #2. Relay denied is a permanent failure (5xx). XMail never retries upon that code. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list:

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Smart smtpfwd

2008-02-24 Thread Harald Schneider
I see - but it would be helpful to ignore and move th the next server in the list in some situations. -- Harald Am 24.02.2008 um 16:54 schrieb Davide Libenzi: On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Harald Schneider wrote: I tested it with smtp.wanadoo.fr which gives a Relay denied and a working 2nd

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Smart smtpfwd

2008-02-23 Thread Rob Arends
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harald Schneider Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 6:18 PM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: Feature Request: Smart smtpfwd When a server is down, it does not instantly pick the next one in the list. -- Harald Davide Libenzi wrote

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Smart smtpfwd

2008-02-22 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Harald Schneider wrote: Hi, it is possible to configure a list of forwarding SMTPs in smtpfwd.tab: *[TAB]server1;server2;... would be nice to have XMail to select e.g. server2 when server1 gives a timeout or some other error. And what's wrong with the current

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Smart smtpfwd

2008-02-22 Thread Harald Schneider
When a server is down, it does not instantly pick the next one in the list. -- Harald Davide Libenzi wrote: On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Harald Schneider wrote: Hi, it is possible to configure a list of forwarding SMTPs in smtpfwd.tab: *[TAB]server1;server2;... would be nice to have XMail

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: pop3links timeout

2007-10-19 Thread Harald Schneider
THANKS! :-) A new pre candidate somewhere ? -- Harald Davide Libenzi wrote: On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Harald Schneider wrote: There should be the possibility to tweak the timeout for a pop3link session (not the sync interval, but the time until the session is hung up if no data comes thru).

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: pop3links timeout

2007-10-19 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Harald Schneider wrote: THANKS! :-) A new pre candidate somewhere ? I'll try to make one this w/end - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: pop3links timeout

2007-10-19 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Harald Schneider wrote: There should be the possibility to tweak the timeout for a pop3link session (not the sync interval, but the time until the session is hung up if no data comes thru). Would be very helpful on slow lines. Your thougts ? I added a new -YT option to

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Multiple POP logins

2007-08-30 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Harald Schneider wrote: Hi, currently a POP box is locked for further logins which is a problem when trying to access the box from other clients or via webmail in parallel. Now we have the feature to keep mails on pop3linked boxes which screams for that feature too.

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Multiple POP logins

2007-08-30 Thread Harald Schneider
THANX! :-) Any vague release date ? -- Harald Davide Libenzi wrote: On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Harald Schneider wrote: Hi, currently a POP box is locked for further logins which is a problem when trying to access the box from other clients or via webmail in parallel. Now we have the

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Multiple POP logins

2007-08-02 Thread Shawn Anderson
can have rather unpredictable consequences :) Shawn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harald Schneider Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 7:53 AM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Re: Feature Request: Multiple POP logins Tracy wrote

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Multiple POP logins

2007-08-02 Thread Harald Schneider
That said, initiating an IMAP and POP3 session at the same time on the same mailbox can have rather unpredictable consequences :) IMHO that's the reason why many servers out there allow shared POP conncection. It is easier to handle this on one single protocol on server level. -- Harald -

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Multiple POP logins

2007-08-01 Thread Tracy
As I understand it, the POP3 specification indicates that the mailbox will be locked for the duration of any login session. I'm not sure that changing that would be a good idea - introduces non-standard behavior. If you need multiple login access to a mailbox, you really need to move to IMAP

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Multiple POP logins

2007-08-01 Thread Harald Schneider
Tracy wrote: As I understand it, the POP3 specification indicates that the mailbox will be locked for the duration of any login session. I'm not sure that changing that would be a good idea - introduces non-standard behavior. That's right. IMHO this should be a configurable option, so that

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Multiple POP logins

2007-08-01 Thread XTechie
Tracy wrote: As I understand it, the POP3 specification indicates that the mailbox will be locked for the duration of any login session. I'm not sure that changing that would be a good idea - introduces non-standard behavior. Thats right and am dead sure Davide is never going to do it.

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Queue Stats via Ctrl Protocol

2007-07-04 Thread Harald Schneider
I have something special in mind here: Beside server monitoring, XMail is a very lean solution for doing mail sync with some custom scripts on mobile systems. The problem here is that a mobile user sends a mail to the XMail proxy, having no plan when the mail is really sent out. So he maybe

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Queue Stats via Ctrl Protocol

2007-06-28 Thread Harald Schneider
I see ... and the same thing limited to send and rsnd ? -- Harald Davide Libenzi wrote: On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Harald Schneider wrote: Would be nice to have a Ctrl command which reports the totals of sending, resending and frozen messages e.g.: # qstatus() send: 5 rsnd: 13 froz: 89

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Queue Stats via Ctrl Protocol

2007-06-27 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Harald Schneider wrote: Would be nice to have a Ctrl command which reports the totals of sending, resending and frozen messages e.g.: # qstatus() send: 5 rsnd: 13 froz: 89 This would make life status displays without querying the queue possible. Also such things

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Fast Shutdown

2006-02-03 Thread Soenke Ruempler
Hi Davide, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, February 02, 2006 5:14 PM: What happen with a kill is that partially written messages can linger in the spool/mailbox. Messages won't be lost in any case, but garbage could be created by a kill. You could send a SIGINT, wait 3-4 seconds and

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Fast Shutdown

2006-02-03 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Soenke Ruempler wrote: Hi Davide, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, February 02, 2006 5:14 PM: What happen with a kill is that partially written messages can linger in the spool/mailbox. Messages won't be lost in any case, but garbage could be created by a

[xmail] Re: Feature Request: Fast Shutdown

2006-02-02 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Alexander Hagenah wrote: Hi Davide, what do you think of a smart feature that let you shutdown XMail gently but fast. XMail quits after all open connection are closed. Any technique, which let XMail look if `restart' or `stop' was made, `SIGKILL' will be sent

[xmail] Re: Feature Request

2004-10-27 Thread Phillip R. Shaw
Problem with this would be that it is xmail that reads and processes the server.tab file, little late to say what user it should run as. Actually I think you can just set the user id and password on the service properties in the services manager. Phillip -Original Message- From:

[xmail] Re: Feature Request

2004-10-27 Thread Chris L. Franklin
That all night and fine if you using a windows server ;) -- Chris L. Franklin -- Problem with this would be that it is xmail that reads and processes the server.tab file, little late to say what user it should run as. Actually I think you can just set the user id and password on the service

[xmail] Re: Feature request

2004-10-02 Thread Shawn Anderson
It might be possible to set the Thread Count to 0 for the parts you want to turn off. Would that work, Davide? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris L. Franklin Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2004 12:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

[xmail] Re: Feature request

2004-10-02 Thread Achim Schmidt
Perhaps you can bind the non used services to port 127.0.0.1. e.g. use tose values XMAIL_CMD_LINE inside xmails init-script -FI 127.0.0.1 for listening finger only on lo -CI 127.0.0.1 for control only on lo -SI 127.0.0.1 for smtp only on lo and so on - the services are not visible to outside

[xmail] Re: Feature request

2004-10-02 Thread Chris L. Franklin
I had thought of that of that but then Lets say I wanted to use something else as my pop3 server. Then it couldn't bind to that port. One of the real reason for this is that I use Courier-IMAP. But as we all know if you use that then you can't use the standard pop3 that xmail uses. Due to it

[xmail] Re: Feature request

2004-10-02 Thread Eric Garnice
Bind the unwanted services to port 0. -Pp 0 -Fp 0 Eric - Original Message - From: Chris L. Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2004 10:58 AM Subject: [xmail] Re: Feature request I had thought of that of that but then Lets say I wanted to use

[xmail] Re: Feature request

2004-10-02 Thread Chris L. Franklin
. -Pp 0 -Fp 0 Eric - Original Message - From: Chris L. Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2004 10:58 AM Subject: [xmail] Re: Feature request I had thought of that of that but then Lets say I wanted to use something else as my pop3 server

[xmail] Re: Feature request - server.tab

2004-01-23 Thread Rob Arends
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 5:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Feature request - server.tab On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, RaveRod wrote: To expand on that idea, have the CtrlClnt read the server, username

[xmail] Re: Feature request - server.tab

2004-01-23 Thread Rob Arends
smile I thought so, that's why I did not put 2.0 (that would have been presumptuous) At least you think it's worth adding to the future features list. Thanks, Rob :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi switches, but

[xmail] Re: Feature request: Custom errors based on blocking lists

2003-10-15 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Tracy wrote: A suggestion for some future version of XMail... At the moment, we have spammers.tab and spam-address.tab. Each of these has a single custom error response which can be set in server.tab. I would propose that it be possible to design a custom error

[xmail] Re: Feature request: Custom errors based on blocking lists

2003-10-15 Thread Rob Arends
Tracy, if this wasn't a feature request, it would be very funny. - No - it is really funny - LOL. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Davide Libenzi Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 8:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re

[xmail] Re: Feature Request

2003-08-04 Thread Shawn Anderson
:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Feature Request I was wonder if it would be possible to support dns entries in the=20 smtprelay.tab file? I have a few remote smtp servers that use dynamic = ip address, but I would like to allow them to relay through my main server. Right now

[xmail] Re: Feature Request

2003-08-03 Thread Sönke Ruempler
I was wonder if it would be possible to support dns entries in the smtprelay.tab file? I have a few remote smtp servers that use dynamic ip address, but I would like to allow them to relay through my main server. Right now, every time they get a new address I need to change the ip in the

[xmail] Re: feature request

2003-06-03 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Davide, in the smtp log if a mail was blocked by the spammers.tab list: 200.196.xxx.xxx 2003-05-29 14:30:09 SNDRIP=EIPSPAM 0 then you never can see who and to whom is spamming (but the IP). Is that possible to enable

[xmail] Re: Feature Request

2003-06-03 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Shawn Anderson wrote: Davide, Any chance you would consider adding the users Last POP3 Access = Date/Time to the userstats command? I'm afraid I have to drop this. You can retry in a few months though :) - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

[xmail] Re: feature request

2003-06-03 Thread me
Are you the only programmer that works on this? A number of these 'features' can easily be farmed out to people who are reasonable programmers for inclusion/merged via cvs. A good example is the spam logging one. I'm sure that a reasonable programmer could shuffle the logging to be prior to

[xmail] Re: feature request

2003-06-03 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you the only programmer that works on this? Yep, and believe it is good like this. I sure do not want XMail to become like Exchange by keeping adding features a go-go. See, the good of free software is that you do *not* have to sell anything.

[xmail] Re: Feature request

2002-11-01 Thread Bill Healy
Then why are you adding IMAP??? :) :) Make it a separate program, or second code tree... paaasseee!!! Bill -- From: Davide Libenzi[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 10:58 AM To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Feature request Lean

[xmail] Re: Feature request

2002-11-01 Thread Liron Newman
Davide Libenzi wrote: On 1 Nov 2002, Aaron Johnson wrote: The PHP admin tool has a nice feature where it allows for login as postmaster per domain and then (I believe) does an auto limit by adding the domain name to all the queries. I have a client setup using this method and they are

[xmail] Re: feature request: spam-blocking hint

2002-06-18 Thread Sönke Ruempler
I'll look into having a server.tab variable where the postmaster can setup a custom message following the strict SMTP one. This message might contain a link to an HTML page where it is described each error returned by XMail, and which is the appropriate action to take. davide, as far as i

[xmail] Re: feature request: spam-blocking hint

2002-06-18 Thread Snke Ruempler
added in 1.10 ok, thx! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[xmail] Re: Feature request

2002-03-17 Thread jan groene
hi, What's wrong with usersetmproc/usergetmproc ? basically nothing excepted i didn't notice it before :) but: the domain filter feature is not accessible via ctrl, is it ? it would be a good thing for customers to pre-filter messages already at their mail providers server bye, jan.

[xmail] Re: Feature request

2002-03-17 Thread Sönke Ruempler
What's wrong with usersetmproc/usergetmproc ? basically nothing excepted i didn't notice it before :) but: the domain filter feature is not accessible via ctrl, is it ? it would be a good thing for customers to pre-filter messages already at their mail providers server see cfgfileset /