Hi all,
for those of you who are wondering why /domain$/ may not match a @@FILE's
4th line: the SMTP filters docs should say
MAIL FROM:...[ SIZE=...] [ 4th line ]
rather than
MAIL FROM:... [ 4th line ]
Apparently, the line holds the peer's MAIL FROM command as is, including
the (optional)
Hello list,
I have quite a serious problem today.
I have a box with xmail v1.20 serving my company and a couple of client
domains.
Today I came to the office to find out that the mailbox is consuming all of
my available
bandwidth (512Kbps/128Kbps) and I am struggling to find out who the heck
Hi,=20
However, I cannot find out who it is.
I'd use Xmail Queuemanager to inspect the queue.
http://xmail.marketmix.com/
(You can do that manually, but you wouldn't want that...)
Regards, Manuel Martin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message
Hello Helio,=20
I'm trying Xmail Queuemanager, but when I try to run xqmwin I get the=20
following errors:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File qmgrwin.py, line 8, in ?
File=20
/usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/wxPython/__init__.py,
line 20,=20
in ?
File=20
On Tuesday, May 03, 2005 10:15 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Francesco Vertova [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The (unrelated) question is: a ListSender[tab] in user.tab sets an
empty MAIL FROM: in delivering to ML users without changing the mail
headers (much like NoSenderBounce in server.tab and unlike
On Tuesday, May 03, 2005 11:05 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Spyros Tsiolis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list,
I have quite a serious problem today.
I have a box with xmail v1.20 serving my company and a couple of
client domains.
Today I came to the office to find out that the mailbox is consuming
Thanx Manuel, but GTK is already installed.
It looks that Xmail Queuemanager requires Python 2.3 installed in an especific
place.
I was thinking of linking Python 2.4 (already installed in my machine) to
those places shown in the error messages, but there's no wxPython directory
in
Can you install it on a windows client and access your Linux box remotely?
That is what I would do, if possible, in your situation. This is not
becauseI particularly like Windows (I do not - actually, I am beginning to
despise it because everyone uses it even when it is not to their advantage
Great Jeff, I agree on almost all you wrote. Almost all because being
ubiquitous doesn't mean that everything will run on it... :-)
I'll make use of Xmail Queuemanager on a Windows client as I'll also make
tests using Outluck, oops, Outlook. I also think it's a good thing to use
what my users