The XMail forum moved from
http://xmailforum.homelinux.net
to
http://xmailforum.marketmix.com
Please update your bookmarks ASAP.
Thank you very much,
Harald
___
xmail mailing list
xmail@xmailserver.org
Hi,
are you around ?
There seems to be some prob with the FTP login:
http://xmailforum.homelinux.net/index.php?showtopic=4249
Hope you are well - didn't hear from you for a very long time ...
-- Harald
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message
OOps - sorry ... not meant for this list.
-- Harald
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have patched it manually - works like a charm. THANX !
-- Harald
Am 29.04.2008 um 07:12 schrieb Harald Schneider:
This shows
$ patch -p1 _fixleopard.txt
patching file MainBSD.cpp
patch: malformed patch at line 13: diff -Nru xmail-1.25/
Makefile.bsd xmail-1.25.mod/Makefile.bsd
Compiling fails with
$ OSTYPE=Darwin make -f Makefile.bsd
gcc -o bin/MkMachDep MkMachDep.o -lssl -lcrypto -lkvm -lpthread
ld: library not found for -lkvm
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [bin/MkMachDep] Error 1
OpenSSL comes with Leopard's XCode Tools and is installed here:
$ ls
I see
/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk/usr/lib/libkvm.dylib
which is not in the system's search path. Anything I can tweak with
this ?
-- Harald
Am 28.04.2008 um 15:27 schrieb CLEMENT Francis:
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Harald
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Harald Schneider
Envoy=E9 : lundi 28 avril 2008 16:35
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Compiling XMail 1.25 fails on OSX Leopard
I see
/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk/usr/lib/libkvm.dylib
which is not in the system's search path. Anything I can tweak
GREAT! ;-)
Can you give a non-C guru some hint how to apply the diff?
Thank you very much,
Harald
Am 28.04.2008 um 20:10 schrieb Davide Libenzi:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Harald Schneider wrote:
Compiling fails with
$ OSTYPE=Darwin make -f Makefile.bsd
gcc -o bin/MkMachDep MkMachDep.o
Davide Libenzi:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Harald Schneider wrote:
GREAT! ;-)
Can you give a non-C guru some hint how to apply the diff?
$ cd XMAILSROUCE
$ patch -p1 PATCHFILE
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
.
-- Harald
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Harald Schneider wrote:
I see - but it would be helpful to ignore and move th the next server
in the list in some situations.
That's a rather odd behaviour. A 5xx means NO, the operation will never
succeed. If you put a server
I see - but it would be helpful to ignore and move th the next server
in the list in some situations.
-- Harald
Am 24.02.2008 um 16:54 schrieb Davide Libenzi:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Harald Schneider wrote:
I tested it with smtp.wanadoo.fr which gives a Relay denied and a
working 2nd
When a server is down, it does not instantly pick the next one in the list.
-- Harald
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Harald Schneider wrote:
Hi,
it is possible to configure a list of forwarding SMTPs in smtpfwd.tab:
*[TAB]server1;server2;...
would be nice to have XMail
Hi,
it is possible to configure a list of forwarding SMTPs in smtpfwd.tab:
*[TAB]server1;server2;...
would be nice to have XMail to select e.g. server2 when server1 gives a
timeout or some other error.
There are at least 2 scenarios where this would be very helpful:
1. XMal as a proxy server
550 5.1.1: You are talking to sendmail. Make sure that it is
completely disabled on your machine. If you reboot, it might occupy port
25 which prevents XMail from binding.
-- Harald
Harald Schneider wrote:
550 Relay denied
550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown
503 Bad sequence
the remote side, and xmail respond with
that log.
Regards
Rosario
- Original Message -
From: Harald Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 7:11 AM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Fw: 550 and 503 after upgrade to 1.25
550 5.1.1: You
Hi,
isn't the External command meanwhile obsolete ?
IMHO there is nothing you can do with it which cannot be done with filters.
-- Harald
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Harald Schneider wrote:
Hi,
I tried to build XMail on this machine:
Linux version 2.4.21-27.0.2.ELsmp ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(gcc version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Lin
ux 3.2.3-47)) #1 SMP Wed Jan 12 23:35:44 EST 2005
... but the build process stops with
make -f
in the standard Linux makefile,
because this seems to be some problem on many Red Hat systems.
Thank you very much,
Harald
Harald Schneider wrote:
I just added the path to /usr/kerbereos/include. If I don't do that, I
get another error:
g++ -I. -D__UNIX__ -D__LINUX__ -D_REENTRANT=1
if it does not compile smoothless.
This RH bug affect also other apps, e.g. qmail:
http://www.raditha.com/linux/krb5.h.php
-- Harald
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Harald Schneider wrote:
Gotit! Must have been my fault due to some additional linebreak. The
correct modification
Hi,
I tried to build XMail on this machine:
Linux version 2.4.21-27.0.2.ELsmp ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(gcc version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Lin
ux 3.2.3-47)) #1 SMP Wed Jan 12 23:35:44 EST 2005
... but the build process stops with
make -f Makefile.lnx
g++ -o bin/XMail MainLinux.o SysDepLinux.o
This user will contact you directly.
Thank you very much,
Harald
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Harald Schneider wrote:
Hi Davide,
a forum user discovered that the spool's mprc folders are being trashed
with huge amount of files, when a user's mailproc.tab contains only
Hi Davide,
a forum user discovered that the spool's mprc folders are being trashed
with huge amount of files, when a user's mailproc.tab contains only a
single mailbox line. Would be nice if you could have a look on it.
-- Harald
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail
THANKS! :-)
A new pre candidate somewhere ?
-- Harald
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Harald Schneider wrote:
There should be the possibility to tweak the timeout for a pop3link
session (not the sync interval, but the time until the session is hung
up if no data comes thru
There should be the possibility to tweak the timeout for a pop3link
session (not the sync interval, but the time until the session is hung
up if no data comes thru). Would be very helpful on slow lines.
Your thougts ?
Thank you very much,
Harald
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Pls check, if MailRoot/message.id is deleted or corrupted.
-- Harald
Rob Arends wrote:
Any thoughts on this one Davide?
What does the (-20) error indicate?
Rob :-)
_
It might look like I'm doing nothing, but on a cellular level, I'm
Maybe this related info from the XMail forum gives some additional
information:
http://xmailforum.homelinux.net/index.php?showtopic=3718hl=exchange
-- Harald
Oliver Stöneberg wrote:
Sorry, I was busy with other stuff and completely forgot about this.
The changes didn't fix the problem
THANX! :-)
Any vague release date ?
-- Harald
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Harald Schneider wrote:
Hi,
currently a POP box is locked for further logins which is a problem when
trying to access the box from other clients or via webmail in parallel.
Now we have
That said, initiating an IMAP and POP3 session at the same time on the same
mailbox can have rather unpredictable consequences :)
IMHO that's the reason why many servers out there allow shared POP
conncection. It is easier to handle this on one single protocol on
server level.
-- Harald
-
Hi,
currently a POP box is locked for further logins which is a problem when
trying to access the box from other clients or via webmail in parallel.
Now we have the feature to keep mails on pop3linked boxes which screams
for that feature too. There are also many POP servers out there which do
access to a mailbox, you really need to move
to IMAP (which, as I understand it, is under development - or there are
third-party solutions which can be deployed with xmail).
Harald Schneider wrote:
Hi,
currently a POP box is locked for further logins which is a problem when
trying
Hi,
another idea came to my mind:
What about implementing another SMTP level scripting hook, which allows
to add custom EHLO responses? This would make such things like e.g.
Delivery Status Notifications possible on scripting level.
-- Harald
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
.
It should be enough to keep these counters in mem. it is just volatile
runtime informaton, no queue scanning needed. If the user wants to know
further details, he can do an expensive scan on his own.
-- Harald
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Harald Schneider wrote:
I see
I see ... and the same thing limited to send and rsnd ?
-- Harald
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Harald Schneider wrote:
Would be nice to have a Ctrl command which reports the totals of
sending, resending and frozen messages e.g.:
# qstatus()
send: 5
rsnd: 13
froz: 89
Would be nice to have a Ctrl command which reports the totals of
sending, resending and frozen messages e.g.:
# qstatus()
send: 5
rsnd: 13
froz: 89
This would make life status displays without querying the queue
possible. Also such things like performance measuring would be a snap...
I think
300
pidfile=/var/run/XMail.pid
sig_stop=-kill $pidfile
# read configuration and set defaults
load_rc_config $name
: ${xmail_enable=NO}
run_rc_command $1
I hope that helps!
Jeff
Harald Schneider wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to relocate the XMail.pid file from /var/run to another
Oopps ... looks that I missed that one! Thanks!
-- Harald
Tjeerd Makel wrote:
Hi Harald,
I think you can use the XMAIL_PID_DIR environment variable? It is
mentioned in the online XMail manual, it works for me on FreeBSD...
Greets,
Tjeerd Makel
On 5/27/2007, Harald Schneider
Hi,
is there a way to relocate the XMail.pid file from /var/run to another
location ?
This would allow to use XMail as e.g. a proxy with user rights only,
startable from a simple script - all files in a single folder.
-- Harald
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail
is this a must have filter?
Thanks.
-Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Harald Schneider
Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2006 12:31 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: XMail Broken Mailer Filter ...
Thanks a lot
Thanks a lot!
Would be nice if this would go into XMail's source. I know, you don't
like filter functionality packed into the sourcecode, but wihtout this
it is vulnerable for this kind of DOS attack. It's a must have for every
user, so why not deliver it with all batteries included ?
Yes, some hints would be nice. Davide ?
Shiloh Jennings wrote:
When will XMail support IMAP?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Davide,
what are these .arch-ids folders that are spread thru the whole
directory tree of the 1.22 Win32 ZIP archive ? Are they vital ?
Thanks,
Harald
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the
You're the best!
It works perfeclty now. Even the stuck mails from the previous build are
delivered instantly.
Can you tell which problem caused this behavious? Something thread related ?
Thanks again,
Harald
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Rene Rivera wrote:
Oh, yes. It is
Has anyone tested if system mails arrive on OpenBSD 3.7 ?
If I do
#mail root
Subject: test
test
..
... then the message stays in resending state without any SLOG created:
[127.0.0.1]:0;[127.0.0.1]:0;Thu, 13 Oct 2005 10:35:17 +0200
local.net
L34FB
mail from:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rcpt to:root
It's exported in XMail's startup script. However adding it to
sendmail.xmail.sh does make no difference ...
--Harald
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Harald Schneider wrote:
Has anyone tested if system mails arrive on OpenBSD 3.7 ?
If I do
#mail root
Subject: test
test
I also added DEFAULT_DOMAIN to the sendmail script - same effect!
Would be nice, if some other OpenBSD users could test this ...
--Harald
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Harald Schneider wrote:
It's exported in XMail's startup script. However adding it to
sendmail.xmail.sh does
Everything works fine now, it was a config issue in /etc/mailer.conf.
Nothing XMail related. 1.23 still does its job and all things are up and
running! THanks!
--Harald
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Harald Schneider wrote:
I also added DEFAULT_DOMAIN to the sendmail script
Thanks for that hint, I notified the admin there !
--Harald
Liam wrote:
It seems that I can't sign up to the xmail forums, the verification system
isn't working.
Just thought I'd let y'all know...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message
Whatever you want my maestro :)
I'll send a snapshot to your private email address. I can also give you
SSH access, if you want to do some test compilations on an OpenBSD 3.7
machine. Just let me know.
--Harald
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Harald Schneider wrote:
Davide
Davide,
it looks like this problem exists in older OpenBSD releases too:
http://xmailforum.homelinux.net/index.php?showtopic=1875st=0#entry10068
If there is no solution available yet, you should mark OpenBSD support
as experimental or remove it.
--Harald
Harald Schneider wrote:
Hi
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Harald Schneider wrote:
Do you think replacing -lpthread with one of these:
-Kthread -kthread -pthread -pthreads -mthreads --thread-safe -mt
might be worth testing ?
Dunno, but according to the link, the -pthread option trigger some special
Hi Davide,
Looks like all instances of -lc_r have to be replaced by -lpthread for
proper compilation on OpenBSD.
meanwhile I ran into some instability issue:
- A sudden coredump after setting up some filters and doing some
KILL/restarts in between. This might be neglectable. I rebooted the
OK .. I 'll run some test after I'm back from vacations :)
Thanks so far,
Harald
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Harald Schneider wrote:
Do you think replacing -lpthread with one of these:
-Kthread -kthread -pthread -pthreads -mthreads --thread-safe -mt
might be worth testing
$ gmake -f Makefile.bsd OSTYPE=OpenBSD
g++ -O2 -I. -D__UNIX__ -D__BSD__ -D__OPENBSD__ -D_REENTRANT=1
-D_THREAD_SAFE=1 -DHAS_SYSMACHINE -c MkMachDep.cpp
g++ -o bin/MkMachDep MkMachDep.o -lkvm -pthread -lc_r
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lc_r
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
gmake: ***
Looks like all instances of -lc_r have to be replaced by -lpthread for
proper compilation on OpenBSD.
Davide, can you fix this in the source tarball ? I'm sure the OpenBSD
community will appreciate this ... :)
--Harald
Harald Schneider wrote:
$ gmake -f Makefile.bsd OSTYPE=OpenBSD
g
...
Thanks,
Harald
Harald Schneider wrote:
Looks like all instances of -lc_r have to be replaced by -lpthread for
proper compilation on OpenBSD.
Davide, can you fix this in the source tarball ? I'm sure the OpenBSD
community will appreciate this ... :)
--Harald
Harald Schneider wrote
chmod +s /chroot/var/MailRoot/bin/sendmail
--Harald
Bill Healy wrote:
Did you create the temp and local directories in spool and do they have
the proper permissions?
/chroot/var/MailRoot/spool/temp/
/chroot/var/MailRoot/spool/local/
Bill
--
From: Den_M[SMTP:[EMAIL
I agree ..
--Harald
Jeff Buehler wrote:
I like the 3d look myself, so
http://www.fonsy.com/XMail_IAN88x31.2.jpg; is also my vote. It's also
relatively easy to read at a small size, and uses elements of the
original logo so that brand recognition is maintained.
Jeff
Davide Libenzi
I feared this argument. IMHO we should use one without logo in that case:
http://primepage.de/gfx/xmail/xmail_blog_button.gif
Why whithout? The logo looks not that good, in smaller sizes.
--Harald
Rob Arends wrote:
Mike, whilst there are a number of good ones to choose from, they all depart
Ouch .. they are all looking VERY attractive :)
powered by should be written above XMail,
If it is beneath, it should read empowered or inside or something
like that ..
Mike Harrington wrote:
Here's a few button ideas I threw together tonight. Mostly all fairly
simple.
This one clearly convinces by its simplicity and it IS an eyecatcher.
Aren't these the core properties of XMail ? :-)
--Harald
Mike Harrington wrote:
I like it alexander
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Hagenah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Thursday,
Thanks Ricardo, but I think the tendecy here is the original logo or no
logo ...
Thanks!
Harald
Ricardo Aparicio García wrote:
Harald Schneider escribió:
This one clearly convinces by its simplicity and it IS an eyecatcher.
Aren't these the core properties of XMail ? :-)
--Harald
I
Too much white space on the left and the word Server should be
readable. Since most website owners don't like big banners, we should
stick to the standard button size.
Just my 2 cents ;)
-- Harald
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
On 22.08.2005 17:46, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Ok, let's have a
The arrangement is much better, but mail server will be unreadable in
smaller sizes ...
--Harald
CLEMENT Francis wrote:
-Message d'origine-
De : Harald Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi 25 août 2005 08:53
À : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Official
Ok .. Mail Server is not that vital. Up to now, this one is my fav:
http://regelt.com/powered_by_xmail.png
--Harald
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
On 25.08.2005 16:44, Rob Arends wrote:
I wouldn't get stressed about reading the word 'server' at smaller
dimensions.
Yes, I think so, too. powered
Let the maestro decide, which one goes official.
Davide ?
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
On 25.08.2005 18:13, Harald Schneider wrote:
Ok .. Mail Server is not that vital. Up to now, this one is my fav:
http://regelt.com/powered_by_xmail.png
Feel free to use it. It's Macromedia Fireworks PNG
Help to promote XMail by putting this powered-by button on your site:
http://xmailforum.homelinux.net/index.php?showtopic=2692
Link it directly with xmailserver.org
--Harald
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Feel free to post a better one and let the community decide :)
Alexander Hagenah wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Monday, August 22, 2005 11:40 AM:
Help to promote XMail by putting this powered-by button on your site:
http://xmailforum.homelinux.net/index.php?showtopic=2692
Link it
Let's say this one has Davide's OK. Feel free to post alternative ones ...
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
Hi Harald,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, August 22, 2005 11:40 AM:
Help to promote XMail by putting this powered-by button on your site:
: Re: POP box scripting hooks ?
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Harald Schneider wrote:
- one before the POP message is retieved by the client??? For
what? You
have the chance to do your homework when you store it.
If you store it in a compressed format or in a database,
you'll need
:29 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: POP box scripting hooks ?
I think that is a very nice idea!!
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Namens Harald Schneider
Verzonden: vrijdag 8 juli 2005 8:47
Aan: xmail
- one before the POP message is retieved by the client??? For
what? You
have the chance to do your homework when you store it.
If you store it in a compressed format or in a database, you'll need this
hook to retreive the orginal message before download. Otherwise you'll need
to write
Hi
a new idea came up in the XMail forum ( http://xmailforum.homelinux.net )
If we would have 2 new scripting hooks, 1 before a POP message is stored and
1 before it would be retrieved by a client we could use a few lines of code
to e.g.
- use a database backend to store all POP boxes,
- use
@xmailserver.org'
Betreff: [xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Bind sending IP ?
=20
=20
What is your reason for having multiple IP addresses on one NIC card?
=20
Bill
=20
=20
--
From:Harald Schneider[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:Tuesday, April 19, 2005 2:13 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
I would say load blancing, but since they all meet on the same physical
interface, it's nonsense. I think the real reason behind this is to
pretend a server park :)
Let's quit here - this goes off topic. Thanks for all replies!
--Harald
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
- The machine hosts 3 IP adresses (1,2,3)
Some additional info:
#2+3 are virutal network interfaces.
--Harald
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL
not simple add a rdns record for ip 1 ?
=20
Francis
=20
=20
=20
-Message d'origine-
De : Harald Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoy=3DE9 : mardi 19 avril 2005 08:06
=3DC0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] AW: Bind sending IP ?
=3D20
=3D20
- The machine hosts 3 IP
I wonder if binding to an outgoing IP can be forced on application =
level.
There is an option for sendmail which seems to do exactly this:
-
ClientPortOptions
This option is similar to the DaemonPortOptions but is meant only for
__outgoing__ connections.
The steps to set this option
,
=20
On Tuesday, April 19, 2005 7:17 PM [GMT+1=3DCET],
Harald Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=20
I wonder if binding to an outgoing IP can be forced on application =
=3D
level.
There is an option for sendmail which seems to do exactly this:
-
ClientPortOptions
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Davide Libenzi
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. M=E4rz 2005 06:39
An: xmail@xmailserver.org
Betreff: [xmail] Re: AW: Re: pop3links handling
=20
=20
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Harald Schneider wrote:
=20
I see .. but this is forced by the patch of a forum
I see .. but this is forced by the patch of a forum user I posted. It
frequently closes the connection after a certain number of retrieved
messages. IMHO this is a clever solution for such situation. Any chance =
that
this goes into the core source ?
--Harald
Uhh?! Have you seen the code? XMail
Hi Davide,
maybe you can save some work with this src patch here:
http://xmailforum.homelinux.net/index.php?showtopic=2404st=0#entry13077
--Harald
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help
OK - thanks!
220 is simply not an allowed response, according to the RFC.
Here is the
relevant section of allowed responses:
COMMAND-REPLY SEQUENCES
Each command is listed with its possible replies.
The prefixes
used before the possible replies are P for
Hi Davide,
is there a chance to implement a pop3link handler, which deletes messages
from the server right after each other?
Background: If a pop3links connection gets interrupted, it retrieves all
messages again from the very beginning. This can cause a lot of duplicates,
when you have a bad
Hagen Mayer
Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Februar 2005 18:59
An: Harald Schneider; xmail@xmailserver.org;=20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [xmail] Re: pop3links handling
=20
=20
Hello!
=20
Harald Schneider wrote at 22 Feb 2005 17:03:
is there a chance to implement a pop3link handler, which deletes
Hi Davide,
it seems that XMail quits with a Bad SMTP response when the remote server
sends a 220 response after a HELO.
Here an example:
Instead of
Connected to mail.uniovi.es.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 ALEPH.NET.UNIOVI.ES -- Server ESMTP (PMDF V6.2-X17#30969)
helo test
250
XMail has the ability to plug external authentications that
works together
with associated client counterparts. At the moment, there's
no way to call
out like POP3. I'll see how to fit this in, if there is an
interest set
with more than one element ;)
There IS interest. Beside me,
Details here:
http://xmailforum.homelinux.net/index.php?showtopic=2098st=0#entry11457
--Harald
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Announce: Spambayes SMTP filter
=20
=20
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Harald Schneider wrote:
=20
Details here:
=20
http://xmailforum.homelinux.net/index.php?showtopic=3D2098st=3D0;
#entry11457
If you drop this inside a dedicated HTML page, I'll link it to the XMail =
home page.
- Davide
If you guys have installed the .rpm, then pls try a built from the =
source
tar ball.
Any differences ?
--Harald
-Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Goesta=20
Smekal - IT executive
Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Juli 2004 15:14
An:
value?
=20
I noticed that SA starts before XMail does, does it make any
difference in which order they start?
=20
Joe
=20
=20
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 19:11:43 +0200, Harald Schneider
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sa_filter.pl can produce timeouts under heavy traffic,=20
which causes=3D20
the process
and see
if that does anything.
=20
Joe
=20
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 09:12:58 +0200, Harald Schneider
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like these files were locked. Do you use any filtes=20
or anti virus
software ?
=20
--Harald
=20
-Urspr=3DFCngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Looks like these files were locked. Do you use any filtes or anti virus
software ?
--Harald
-Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Joe Harrell
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Juli 2004 08:12
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [xmail] Re:
... can be tested here:
http://xmail.marketmix.com/downloads/xqmagent_openbsd.tgz
http://xmail.marketmix.com/downloads/xqmagent_netbsd.tgz
More infos about XMail Queue Manager here:
http://xmail.marketmix.com
--Harald
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body
Meanwhile there is a SpamAssassin ruleset available from
http://xmailforum.homelinux.net/index.php?showtopic=3D1837
It's easy to adapt to a handmade Perl filter, so SA is not vitally
necessary.
--Harald
-Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
Sorry -- the link was crippled by Outlook (or the mail gateway ?)
The correct topic id is 1837 or search by subject New virus sends =
German
mails, without virus!.
--Harald
-Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Harald Schneider
Please update to sa_filter2 or ba_filter. The original sa_filter misses =
some
mails when spamd is too busy.
http://xmail.marketmix.com/downloads/sa_filter2.zip
http://xmail.beaucox.com/
--Harald
-Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag
Tweak the resend cycle:
-Qi ratio
Set the increment ratio of the reschedule time in =
sending a
messages. At every failure in delivery a message, =
reschedule
time T is incremented by (T / ratio), therefore :
T(i) =3D
=20
On Thursday 27 May 2004 04:58 am, Harald Schneider wrote:
Sorry -- take this one:
http://xmail.marketmix.com/downloads/sa_filter2.zip
It is also possible to restart spamd for updating your *.cf files, =
=3D
without
loosing any mail or spam going trough unscanned!
Err -5
Aloha Beau,
nice piece of work. Nevertheless I have 1 small improvement:
Some users of Don's original script have experienced unscanned spam =
passing
thru, when the machine is extremely busy. I tracked down this issue. =
spamc
retries to connect spamd only 3 times and quits then with a Filter
I hate Outlook ... just replace the =3D with equal signs ...
--Harald
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo
