Hello Davide,
Tuesday, November 7, 2006, 1:35:50 AM, you wrote:
How badly would be needed the ability to list in flight messages, with
the ability to schedule now them?
Kind of like a requeue? It would be nice, but so far I have lived
without it... This coming from a die hard postfix
Hello Helio,
Tuesday, November 7, 2006, 2:16:46 PM, you wrote:
Em Segunda 06 Novembro 2006 20:12, Davide Libenzi escreveu:
Then *every* message of a given user would be fed back to the mailing
list. Not good.
Just use the mailing list reply-to and ask the support dudes to do a
reply-to-all
just to clear things up, the post-RCPT filter is executed during the SMTP
phase after each RCPT_TO transaction, before XMail sends the SMTP response
back to th client. You have no message data available when the filter
runs. Only client IP:PORT info, and sender return path (and, of course,
Hello Davide,
How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities?
This would be a very nice to have, as each user can then control their
own settings etc.
I was actually looking at making this a filter code decision. By
default filter runs, but if user chooses to not have this
Hello Clive,
Monday, October 30, 2006, 11:27:09 PM, you wrote:
I am already using SORBS and I see in the SMTP log that a lot of messages a=
re rejected because of SORBS. But I still get a lot of spam from other ser=
vers that SORBS don't seem to know about. I checked on the SORBS web site
We have default rule-set of fire-walling rules per server. Even if the
server is behind a fire-wall itself, we still apply fire-walling on each
server itself. This set includes an RFC set by default.
From experience I can say that the networks bleed a lot of such
traffic all over.
When I asked
Haven't seen this request before, but a quick test shows what to do:
Set up the mailproc.tab of the user you intend having the
autoresponder for. This can still deliver to the mailbox as well..
Use first line. If you don't want to keep the message, remove the
mailbox entry.
mailbox
external
Have a look at Uebimiau. I use it, and it works nicely. Can work with
any POP3 server, and does not even have have to be on the same
machine, as it uses SMTP auth for sending, like a normal mail
client...
http://www.uebimiau.org/
No need for anything other than Uebimiau, Apache with PHP and
sysinternals.com has a nice tcpview package, allowing you to see the
process and the connections which are active. I use this regularly on
Windows XP for trouble shooting and Trojan/Virus hunting on clients'
machines. (That's when you notice that the explorer process is suddenly
listening on
Wednesday, September 6, 2006, 8:42:38 PM, you wrote:
Run a script internally. With filter tabs. I use 2 barracudas for the
outside then spammassasin on the inside.
[snip]
Helio Cavichiolo Jr wrote:
I have a server running xmail with several domains and users.
Is there a way to detect
I already have some functions to send individual emails in use, but
some customers are need to send small text messages directly from a
outlook express (for example) to 150 Bcc destinations.
Although, at 100 messages I would suggest using a mailing list instead so
each one is sent out
From my (documented) startup script:
# -Qt 1800 Timeout for next try sending.
# -Qi 12Increment Ratio for retries.
# -Qr 40Maximum number of retries before returning this message.
These are the options that define the timeout period. This particular
config equates to about
, 19 Jun 2006, Jorn Hass wrote:
I am not sure if an incoming mail resets the date-stamp as it comes
in, back to the original 30 days, or wether the time-stamp just gets
left to the initial access. In which case it would mean that the
stream mail would never expire. Davide can possibly confirm/deny
Hi All...
Ok, so there has been various comments around this. As you wish to
LIMIT delays on valid incoming, what you need to do is keep your
expire time-out on the database as long as possible.
My settings are as follows:
# 10 minutes
timeo=600
# 30 days...
exptimeo=2592000
# 2 hour
There is one other thing that can be done, something which I have been
considering:
Instead of using the XMail native blacklist mechanism, write a filter,
which does the checking.
Then, do the lookups on the various blacklists, and accordingly
accept/deny.
Of course, at any point in time, you
Yes, glst allows for just that...
Extract from my glst.conf file:
[Quote]
generr=0
rejerr=3
# 10 minutes
timeo=600
# 30 days...
exptimeo=2592000
# 2 hour
lametimeo=7200
# Exclude certain subnets from greylisting...
# Localhost...
xnet=127.0.0.1,255.255.255.255
[/Quote]
Thursday, June 15, 2006,
it
can't be useful as part of a scoring system, but if you use it directly
to reject mail, you're *going* to lose legitimate mail...
Jorn Hass wrote:
Hi all.
For those that are interested, I did some quick reports for the last 7
days, plus today:
Rejects per blacklist:
15
Hi All...
Ok, DNS is a strange beast at best.
One of the main problems I have found, is people having TTLs of 0
seconds. Effectively the query has timed out before it has returned.
This does not seem to be the case in the mentioned domains, i.e.
ifrance.com etc.
It does make sense about what
85.250.39.162
Wed Apr 26 10:30:00 2006 1 88.137.176.231
Wed Apr 26 10:30:00 2006 1 88.155.148.150
(Logfile I append every 10 minutes with summary of FIN_WAIT_2
states...)
Tuesday, April 25, 2006, 7:47:06 PM, you wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Jorn Hass wrote:
Davide: Seems
Hi All...
Managed to get back on the list. Please excuse the from address, one
of my more cynical moments... :)
Davide: Seems like your server somehow didn't close the FIN_WAIT_2
state on my server, due to IPFW firewalling. (Known FreeBSD
problem...) I have subsequently set the firewalling to
see its contruction.
On 2/22/06, Jorn Hass [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dunno what my own mail will rate, as it has the full erectile (:P)
names in there... :)
Ok, so I'm obviously a better spammer than I thought, when it comes to
evading spamassassin rules... :) Spamassassin shows:
X-Spam
Hello Tony,
(See answer below, quote left in for completeness...)
Saturday, February 18, 2006, 1:57:58 AM, you wrote:
I am testing Davide's greylist module (as usual - very nice), but have one
question. It seems that the sender always receives 1 bounce message when
greylisting is
Hi all...
First of, a huge wave to David L. for a great piece of software...
Secondly a big wave to the rest on this list...
(For the record, I'm in sunny (Currently) Johannesburg, South
Africa... [We have been tormented with torrential rains in the last
month or so...])
I am new to this list,
23 matches
Mail list logo
