On 19 May 2005, at 9:44, Javier Navarro wrote:
Hi
Last days I've been using RDNS and RBL (sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org) ckecks
and many of my customers had problems. Some because they couldn't
receive e-mail from other ISPs that didn't configure RDNS and others
because they couldn't
On 19 May 2005, at 9:44, Javier Navarro wrote:
Hi
Last days I've been using RDNS and RBL (sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org) ckecks
and many of my customers had problems. Some because they couldn't
receive e-mail from other ISPs that didn't configure RDNS and others
because they couldn't
On 31 May 2005, at 16:46, Sönke Ruempler wrote:
Hi Davide and list,
a couple of weeks ago there was a little discussion on the list about
the file permissions and creation masks. I was the one who answered:
If you chmod your MailRoot 700, you don't have to care about these
things.
But
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17 Jun 2005, at 18:52, Ross Gohlke wrote:
Which version of XMail?
What are outputs of: 'lsof | grep -c XMail' and '/sbin/sysctl
kern.openfiles'?
I ran XMail 1.17 on FreeBSD 4.10 for some time without a problem once
configured. Now with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18 Jun 2005, at 14:08, Ross Gohlke wrote:
Which version of XMail?
1.21 from source.
What are outputs of: 'lsof | grep -c XMail' and '/sbin/sysctl
kern.openfiles'?
james# lsof | grep -c XMail
0
james# /sbin/sysctl kern.openfiles
On 19 Jun 2005, at 12:43, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Your get system panics using the patch? Are you certain you have the
right one - I get nothing like that at all. Perhaps you are running a
service that uses the function (kqueue_stat in kern_event.c) and
doesn't like it that I am not running?
On 29 Aug 2005, at 3:33, jonn ah wrote:
Hi all,
we're using xmail's pop3 and smtp service but when we try to send
messages to either yahoo or hotmail, the messages does not seem to get
delivered...Is there a default blacklist list that xmail automatically
throws out messages to yahoo or
I've been trying to setup a server to replace the one on FreeBSD 5.3
which is giving a fairly regular panic due to problems more with
FreeBSD than Xmail which I had running for months without problem on
much faster hardware (p4-2400 vs 586-133).
NetBSD box is an AMD k6-400 and I had NetBSD 2.0
On 16 Jan 2006, at 16:28, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, David Lord wrote:
I've been trying to setup a server to replace the one on FreeBSD 5.3
which is giving a fairly regular panic due to problems more with
FreeBSD than Xmail which I had running for months without problem
On 17 Jan 2006, at 11:41, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, David Lord wrote:
On 16 Jan 2006, at 16:28, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, David Lord wrote:
I've been trying to setup a server to replace the one on FreeBSD
5.3 which is giving a fairly regular
On 17 Jan 2006, at 22:26, David Lord wrote:
One other possibility is I missed out a required postupdate step so
I'll run postinstall against the NetBSD 3.0 distribution from cd.
Postinstall found lots of failed checks and fixed them. Rebout shows
system to be hosed.
At least restoring
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17 Jan 2006, at 11:41, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Can you try this?
$ find /usr/include -type f -exec grep -H statfs {} \;
Hi again
I'm still no further forward with solution as to why I can't get a
clean compile of 1.21 or 1.22 on NetBSD 3.0.
On 17 Feb 2006, at 20:50, Jorn Hass wrote:
Hi all...
First of, a huge wave to David L. for a great piece of software...
Secondly a big wave to the rest on this list...
(For the record, I'm in sunny (Currently) Johannesburg, South
Africa... [We have been tormented with torrential rains
On 22 Feb 2006, at 9:47, Jorn Hass wrote:
Hello decker,
Wednesday, February 22, 2006, 2:14:00 AM, you wrote:
Hellos,
I think this is the same patch yall are trying with, I couldn't
verify since the bug/pr database was busy when I just tried to
look.
On 20 Jan 2006, at 17:42, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, David Lord wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17 Jan 2006, at 11:41, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Can you try this?
$ find /usr/include -type f -exec grep -H statfs {} \;
Hi again
I'm
On 7 Mar 2006, at 7:54, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, David Lord wrote:
Update on my problem with xmail-1.22 failing to compile on NetBSD
3.0/i386.
Still no luck with this. It would be nice to hear from someone that
is using xmailserver with NetBSD 3.0/i386.
Sorry, I
On 11 Mar 2006, at 8:37, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, David Lord wrote:
Well it was quite a while back (Jan 17).
g++ -O2 -I. -D__UNIX__ -D__BSD__ -D__NETBSD__ -D_REENTRANT=1
-D_THREAD_SAFE=1 -DHAS_SYSMACHINE -c SysDep.cpp
In file included from SysDep.cpp:40
On 15 Mar 2006, at 15:06, Jorn Hass wrote:
Hi
Had a mail from Jorn Hass (jornh_at_staffmail.is.co.za) this morning
as he's not been able to get mail into the list since Feb 22.
All I can see is that there doesn't seem to be an NS for
staffmail.is.co.za nor any A record although there is an
On 17 Mar 2006, at 10:58, Jorn Hass wrote:
Hello David,
I have sent a request to [EMAIL PROTECTED] earlier today, in
order to see if the A record made any difference. The e-mail has been
accepted by the remote side... I am now waiting for a response from
the list server... I even
I'm not sure of exact cause but I'm getting fairly regular coredumps
from XMail on NetBSD-3.0. Whist the fd-open files issue on my FreeBSD
setup isn't apparent it is still an annoyance and if anything was a
little more frequent, 2 - 3 days vs 2 - 3 weeks.
I've been able to produce a coredump
On 1 Jun 2006, at 17:49, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2006, David Lord wrote:
I'm not sure of exact cause but I'm getting fairly regular coredumps
from XMail on NetBSD-3.0. Whist the fd-open files issue on my
FreeBSD setup isn't apparent it is still an annoyance
On 3 Jun 2006, at 9:35, David Lord wrote:
snipped
This now looks as though I've been picking up NetBSD 2 packages
rather than NetBSD 3. I noticed a while back that new install of lsof
from a package was complaining it was 2.0 so checked on gmake binary
which hadn't changed from before I
On 12 Jun 2006, at 17:21, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, David Lord wrote:
This now looks as though I've been picking up NetBSD 2 packages
rather than NetBSD 3. I noticed a while back that new install of
lsof from a package was complaining it was 2.0 so checked on gmake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Jun 2006, at 15:06, Gideon So wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks for your prompt answers. I tried all the advices you all
provided here I found that there is nothing do with the smtprelay
saettings.
While I try to send mail in command line (I am
On 6 Nov 2006, at 12:05, Davide Libenzi wrote:
At this point, I really can't think of any reason why we shouldn't have a
pre11 too :)
Well I'm happy with 1.22 although last week had internet connection
problems and for first time a requeue function would have been
welcome. As it was I
On 18 Nov 2006, at 16:22, Davide Libenzi wrote:
How many are running it and did any problem show up? I'd go for 1.23 final
if everything is going fine ...
There were no problems using pre14 since Nov 13, and I've just
compiled and installed pre15 this morning (NetBSD 3.1RC1).
Test mails
On 15 Jan 2007, at 20:49, Rob Arends wrote:
4.
What did you find in your logs?
Anything abnormal from IPs other than 10.10.10.99?
Your scripts on the server - are they webforms where email can be sent? (you
know, contact us forms)
There are known vulnerabilities in some web forms where
On 23 Jan 2007, at 18:05, Hal Dell wrote:
Hello all... I attempted a migration to v1.24 and also tighten down xMail
SMTP server to reject more SPAM.
I have set CheckMailerDomain=1 and SMTP-RDNSCheck=1. I would first like
somone point me to a web page or other documenation that can
On 23 Jan 2007, at 7:54, Filip Supera wrote:
Davide Libenzi a écrit :
Hmmm, that shouldn't happen. Did anyone else have problems with wlex?
Does anyone else use wlex with success ?
I thought I was but turns out not until tonight had a 451 temporary
failure then added wlex and
On 25 Jan 2007, at 16:29, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, David Lord wrote:
On 23 Jan 2007, at 7:54, Filip Supera wrote:
Davide Libenzi a écrit :
Hmmm, that shouldn't happen. Did anyone else have problems with wlex?
Does anyone else use wlex
On 12 Feb 2007, at 20:28, Brian wrote:
Any opinions on using ClamAV with XMail?
How good is ClamAV and is it secure / stable?
I installed both fprot and clamav on NetBSD with intention of using
whichever I managed to get working first which turned out to be
fprot. I've no reason to suspect
I'm sure this used to work.
Sending mail from eg [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't
work and gives an error in slog:
ErrCode = -215
ErrString = DNS name not exist
Recipient domain fileserver.home does not exist
-bash [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ host fileserver
On 16 Mar 2007, at 0:16, David Lord wrote:
I never thought to try sending from fileserver.home to mail.home and
find that works ok, so something different between my 1.22 and 1.25
setups.
I'm sure this used to work.
Sending mail from eg [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't
On 15 Mar 2007, at 18:00, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, David Lord wrote:
I'm sure this used to work.
Sending mail from eg [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't
work and gives an error in slog:
ErrCode = -215
ErrString = DNS name not exist
On 30 Mar 2007, at 7:40, Dale Qualls wrote:
Davide:
Freshmeat.net shows no activity for 19 months, is it a mature product
that needs no development (based on the functionality)?
Anyone using it? I'm seriously considering it (or maia, something to GL).
I suspect a lot are. Now
On 7 Apr 2007, at 20:08, Don Drake wrote:
I don't get it.
I just upgraded to 1.24 (more emails on that later), and I'm still getting
ENODNS from @returns.bulk.yahoo.com. I just commented out my SmartDNSHost
setting and cleared dnscache and it's still occurring. Now that I'm
grasping
I've just noticed named is throwing up an error each time a
connection is made from xmailserver.org.
unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL) resolving
'xmailserver.org.blackhole.securitysage.com/A/IN'
Looking back through logs I see this started on April 4.
Any ideas what this is due to?
I'll try to
On 8 Apr 2007, at 23:09, David Lord wrote:
I've just noticed named is throwing up an error each time a
connection is made from xmailserver.org.
unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL) resolving
'xmailserver.org.blackhole.securitysage.com/A/IN'
Looking back through logs I see this started on April
On 9 Apr 2007, at 1:04, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Here it is:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre03.tar.gz
First failure to build one in a long time.
NetBSD 3.1.0_PATCH
SysDepUnix.cpp: In function 'int SysStackAlloc(ThreadStack**, int)';
SysDepUnix.cpp:1121: error:
On 9 Apr 2007, at 9:15, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, David Lord wrote:
On 9 Apr 2007, at 1:04, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Here it is:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre03.tar.gz
First failure to build one in a long time.
NetBSD 3.1.0_PATCH
On 9 Apr 2007, at 16:09, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, David Lord wrote:
On 9 Apr 2007, at 9:15, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, David Lord wrote:
On 9 Apr 2007, at 1:04, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Here it is:
http
On 9 Apr 2007, at 17:13, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, David Lord wrote:
Could you give a spin to pre04?
No errors and now installed.
Abuse.net relaytest checked ok.
Thanks for testing!
Your welcome
Oh and no longer get the ENODNS when connecting to my server
On 30 Apr 2007, at 8:33, Edmonds, J.B. wrote:
The smptgw.tab is just what I am looking for (granularity). I don't
know how to tell whether to use Login, CRAM-MD5 or Plain for the
relay server. In debug mode it doesn't show the actual interchange
between the servers (or I don't know how to
On 1 May 2007, at 7:07, Ana Paula Fernandes wrote:
Hi,
I have testing 1.25-pre09 for some days in the normal production server.
I have found one case when XMail resolve DNS with incorrect MX server.
Domain: ps5.com.br
XMail is trying delivery to server gordo.ps5.com.br or
On 29 May 2007, at 18:57, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Here's the *preliminary* release of XMail supporting IPV6:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre12.tar.gz
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre12.win32bin.zip
Both IPV4 and IPV6 formats are supposed to be working. The usual IPV4
On 30 May 2007, at 11:20, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007, David Lord wrote:
On 30 May 2007, at 11:25, David Lord wrote:
On 29 May 2007, at 18:57, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Here's the *preliminary* release of XMail supporting IPV6:
http://www.xmailserver.org
On 30 May 2007, at 14:13, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007, David Lord wrote:
On 30 May 2007, at 18:57, David Lord wrote:
On 30 May 2007, at 11:20, Davide Libenzi wrote:
..
Can you show me the content of smtprelay.tab?
Same as from late January when
On 30 May 2007, at 22:24, xmail@xmailserver.org wrote:
On 30 May 2007, at 14:13, Davide Libenzi wrote:
...
Try to run in debug mode (-Md) from a console, not from a daemonize
script. Then show me what's the output when you connect to the SMTP port.
OK but first I need to get as
On 30 May 2007, at 16:12, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Can you try to build the program below, and then run?
$ ./ipaddr 192.168.59.0 255.255.255.0
- Davide
#include sys/types.h
#include sys/socket.h
#include stdio.h
#include netinet/in.h
#include netdb.h
#include string.h
On 30 May 2007, at 19:04, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Here's -pre14 with the fixes for the problems found by David Lord:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre14.tar.gz
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre14.win32bin.zip
Compiled
On 31 May 2007, at 9:55, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007, David Lord wrote:
On 30 May 2007, at 19:04, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Here's -pre14 with the fixes for the problems found by David Lord:
http
On 31 May 2007, at 12:32, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007, David Lord wrote:
I used same commandline as for pre11. From your original post I
understood that the IPV6 options were only needed if there was an
active IPV6 connection which I no longer have working.
-Md -Mr
I'm finding that currently hotmail appears to make just one attempt
to deliver and then gives up. Of course it's my mailserver that's
broken as hotmail is a large organisation and I'm just a hobbyist.
What I'd like to be able to do is check for, and if not already
present, prime glst.dbm with
On 5 Jun 2007, at 22:48, Rob Arends wrote:
I came across this little command, thought someone might find it useful
testing SSL on xmail:
openssl s_client -showcerts -starttls smtp -connect
x35.xmailserver.org:25
It uses openssl to 'telnet' to your smtp server and display a
On 10 Jun 2007, at 12:19, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Ivo Smits wrote:
Davide,
I've been experimenting with IPv6 (using 6to4),
some addresses are not reachable over 6to4,
at least telnet and firefox retry over IPv4 after a (too big) delay.
I think XMail should do
On 10 Jun 2007, at 20:34, David Lord wrote:
On 10 Jun 2007, at 12:19, Davide Libenzi wrote:
..
I made pre15 with some new -M* options. You can select if to use only
IPV4, only IPV6, IPV4 if present or IPV6, IPV6 if present or IPV4.
It defaults to the former at the moment.
NetBSD
On 12 Jun 2007, at 9:41, Hal Dell wrote:
Hello All... I have a sender who is using our xMail infrastructure to send
eMails and one such eMail address is associated with the destination eMail
Server mail22.webcontrolcenter.com which has implemented Greylisting (For
those not familiar with
On 12 Jun 2007, at 8:05, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, David Lord wrote:
On 10 Jun 2007, at 20:34, David Lord wrote:
On 10 Jun 2007, at 12:19, Davide Libenzi wrote:
..
I made pre15 with some new -M* options. You can select if to use only
IPV4, only
On 12 Jun 2007, at 12:31, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, David Lord wrote:
On 12 Jun 2007, at 8:05, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, David Lord wrote:
On 10 Jun 2007, at 20:34, David Lord wrote:
On 10 Jun 2007, at 12:19, Davide Libenzi wrote
On 12 Jun 2007, at 16:34, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, David Lord wrote:
As soon as -P6 and -S6 are added Pegasus/ka9q(dos) doesn't connect to
xmail with ka9q log showing connect failed: reset/refused.
xmail acts
On 13 Jun 2007, at 9:09, David Lord wrote:
.
Don't know if relevant but I just noticed in failure message I can't see any
reference to the mx mail.lordynet.me.uk or mx alias C.mail.aaisp.net.uk.
Failure message:
[00] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[Network kernel error
On 13 Jun 2007, at 8:57, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, David Lord wrote:
Ok that allowed me to send from dos box and now accepted by xmail but
I still get reject from mail.lordynet.me.uk
Below are xmail commandline, failure message and capture of telnet
session from
On 13 Jun 2007, at 11:16, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Here's -pre16 with the fixes for the problems (yep, more of them) found by
David Lord:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre16.tar.gz
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre16
Last night and today I've been overwhelmed by spam, majority being
caught by spamassassin. Tonight I noticed glst.dbm hadn't changed
since yesterday when I restarted with xmail-1.25-pre16 and ipv6
enabled. I then remembered Davide mentioned a glst update for ipv6,
so glst-0.25 now installed,
On 14 Jun 2007, at 23:55, Hal Dell wrote:
Dear David Lord-
Hal Dell wrote:
The problem is that I received the error code and message 451
Greylisted, please try again in 900 seconds. In the case of xMail it
did not retry to send the eMail.
According to RFC2505, 4xx
On 4 Oct 2007, at 0:36, K. Wolf wrote:
Hi,
Last weekend I had an example of this happen to one of my backup mail servers.
When I noticed the problem there were 27,000 NDR type messages it was
trying to deliver.
Mostly all were sent to random [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the mail server
was
On 11 Oct 2007, at 16:02, Fabian Cenedese wrote:
Hi
I recently had a case where xmail got about a dozen mails at the same
time (with PSYNC). So I then had several threads doing virus scanning
and spam checking. As each thread only got a little CPU time they
timed out and the mails slipped
On 3 Oct 2007, at 9:56, Hal Dell wrote:
Hello All...
Recently a SPAMer started sending eMails to the server using a dictionary
for eMail addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. Then the
eMail Servers trys to send an eMail message back to the sender indicating
the eMail
On 17 Nov 2007, at 19:11, Filip Supera wrote:
Bonjour Davide,
R=E9ponse au message re=E7u le 17/11/2007 =E0 18:57 :
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, Filip Supera wrote:
Hello,
=20
I've got two machines running XMAIL. One has 1.24 and the other has
1.25.
I use SSL on port 465 for SMTP.
On 21 Nov 2007, at 9:27, Dale Qualls wrote:
Same problem thing this morning. Sent a message, waited 30 minutes and
it's still sitting in the queue, no SLOG file, message was sitting in
the spool just fine. Restart XMail and the message flies on through.
Is there anything strange with my
On 21 Nov 2007, at 23:27, David Lord wrote:
On 21 Nov 2007, at 9:27, Dale Qualls wrote:
Same problem thing this morning. Sent a message, waited 30 minutes and
it's still sitting in the queue, no SLOG file, message was sitting in
the spool just fine. Restart XMail and the message
On 22 Nov 2007, at 11:51, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, David Lord wrote:
I should have added that defaults for retries seem very conservative
and much safer for a production server than my values that ramp up
the period between reduced number of retries much more
Anyone using fprot with xmail?
My main server has given a couple of empty messages that a virus has
been found but no details and that was last week but it crashed last
week then earlier today.
Today my test server al;so crashed after uptime of 200+ days and on
restart I find multiple
On 2 Dec 2007, at 21:46, David Lord wrote:
Anyone using fprot with xmail?
My main server has given a couple of empty messages that a virus has
been found but no details and that was last week but it crashed last
week then earlier today.
I've now manually run fprot on the most recent
Hi
I've just been setting up a new server running NetBSD-4 and copied my
existing 1.25-pre25 NetBSD 3.1 directory and binaries.
'telnet localhost 25'
Allows me to connect and accepts a test email.
All attempts at using the interface hostname or ip address get a
connection refused.
I've
I've just been setting up a new server running NetBSD-4 and copied my
existing 1.25-pre25 NetBSD 3.1 directory and binaries.
'telnet localhost 25'
Allows me to connect and accepts a test email.
All attempts at using the interface hostname or ip address get a
connection refused.
On 20 Jan 2008, at 2:43, David Lord wrote:
I've just been setting up a new server running NetBSD-4 and copied my
existing 1.25-pre25 NetBSD 3.1 directory and binaries.
'telnet localhost 25'
Allows me to connect and accepts a test email.
All attempts at using the interface
On 20 Jan 2008, at 12:34, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, David Lord wrote:
On 20 Jan 2008, at 2:43, David Lord wrote:
I've just been setting up a new server running NetBSD-4 and copied my
existing 1.25-pre25 NetBSD 3.1 directory and binaries.
'telnet
On 20 Jan 2008, at 12:34, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Give me a summary :) Should I look into it or not?
Seems way hostnames are checked is different between NetBSD-4.0
(xmail-1.25-pre16) and NetBSD-3.1 (xmail-1.25) or NetBSD-3.1 (xmail
1.25).
NetBSD 3.1 3.1 4.0
xmail
On 30 Jan 2008, at 23:35, David Lord wrote:
Now back to NetBSD-4.0.
I'm still unable to get local mail outgoing from NetBSD-4.0
whilst mail to public addresses seems be delivered ok.
The dns server is same for NetBSD-3.1 as for NetBSD-4.0 so I
suspect problem is due to some changes from
On 7 Feb 2008, at 23:50, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, David Lord wrote:
On 30 Jan 2008, at 23:35, David Lord wrote:
Now back to NetBSD-4.0.
I'm still unable to get local mail outgoing from NetBSD-4.0
whilst mail to public addresses seems be delivered ok
On 18 Feb 2008, at 12:27, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Hi all -
Sorry to be late to the game with this - in an earlier list email that I
inadvertently deleted (thinking I had no helpful input, of course!)
titled Problem with XMail on NetBSD-4 there was a discussion about the
error:
Recipient
On 20 Mar 2008, at 22:50, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Hello Davide and list
Here is a sample xmail generated 'Received :' header :
Received: from some_sender_name ([aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd]:p)
(not important)
What is exactly the
On 21 Mar 2008, at 1:56, max toro q wrote:
Hello, I'm new in this list.
I installed Xmail on win2k, and I have delivery problems to hotmail.
Some messages get delivered, some simply get lost. The log shows no
sign of problem.
I've also done some testing with gmail and yahoo, no problem
On 21 Mar 2008, at 16:41, Francesco Vertova wrote:
At 12.47 21/03/08, David Lord wrote:
On 21 Mar 2008, at 1:56, max toro q wrote:
I installed Xmail on win2k, and I have delivery problems to hotmail.
Some messages get delivered, some simply get lost. The log shows no
sign of problem
On 24 Apr 2008 at 14:46, Vinny Wadding wrote:
Damn, I was hoping I had missed an option in server.tab. ;-)
I only mentioned the memory usage above to clarify that I didn't look like =
it I was any leak in XMail itself. Obviously, this is a new server and at =
the moment only
On 26 Apr 2008 at 22:46, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Oliver Stöneberg wrote:
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Seems there was some post about this.
The BIG figure is when the final domain have multiple mx servers.
Suppose the final domain have
On 2 May 2008 at 10:27, Hal Dell wrote:
Hello...
For those of you who don't know Postini -- the company was founded in 1999
in California as a eMail Communication Security and Compliance company. By
May 2004 it was relaying 1.4B eMail annually for over 3300 companies.
Postini was recently
On 4 May 2008 at 13:00, Hal Dell wrote:
..
It is my understanding that Mail-Auth was designed be to implement a
submission port as defined by RFC 4409?
In fact, RFC 4409 states: 3.2. Message Rejection and Bouncing.
MTAs and MSAs MAY implement message rejection rules that rely in
On 4 May 2008 at 22:16, Hal Dell wrote:
Dear David Lord -
I've still not worked out if you want mail coming in via postini to be
allowed
to be relayed or if postini is just an external filter for scanning some
of your
incoming mail. If the latter, I can't see why it should need
On 13 May 2008 at 18:01, Davide Libenzi wrote:
I put out a pre01 version of 1.26:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.26-pre01.tar.gz
Thanks
that installed ok first on NetBSD 3.1 then on both of NetBSD 4.1
servers.
Cheers
David
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.26-pre01.win32bin.zip
On 7 Oct 2008 at 16:13, gbainbridge wrote:
How does the content of your pop3links.tab file look like?
This is it. Note that I have tried ? and @ prefixes without any success.
bainb.co.uk gary mail.myisp.comgbainbridge
XXAPOP
bainb.co.uk
On 8 Oct 2008 at 5:17, gbainbridge wrote:
Fabian Cenedese wrote:
Are the mails received by the ISP somehow modified?
Not that I can tell. The only place in the header where I see the original
recipient's name is the 'To' line. My ISP adds X-Originally-To: but that
only
On 10 Nov 2008 at 12:58, Kövesdi György wrote:
Is there any explanation available for the log file entries?
e.g.: RCPT=ERELAY: I hope it means that relaying is denied.
You have all xmail errors explained here :
http://www.xmailserver.org/Errors.html
OK, but it does not explain the
Problem compiling xmail on NetBSD-5_BETA
Hi
I've tried compile of various versions of xmail and all give
this error on NetBSD-5_BETA although binaries from earlier
NetBSD 3.1 and 4.0 appeared to be running ok after upgrade
to NetBSD-5.
SSLBind.cpp: In function 'int
On 6 Mar 2009 at 9:51, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, David Lord wrote:
Problem compiling xmail on NetBSD-5_BETA
Hi
I've tried compile of various versions of xmail and all give
this error on NetBSD-5_BETA
On 19 Aug 2009 at 10:25, Edinilson - ATINET wrote:
Hi All,
Some users are asking us about smtp tls to be used together with google.
What do we need to configure in Xmail to support smtp tls ?
obs: Xmail Win32 running on Windows 2000 Server SP4
I found that although I can connect to my
On 19 Aug 2009 at 16:41, Edinilson - ATINET wrote:
Davide, I checked:
http://www.xmailserver.org/Readme.html#ssl_configuration
and created server.cert and server.key
And in server.tab
SMTP-TLS 1
EnableSMTP-TLS 1
Using netstat -an I can see that port 465 was opened.
But, for some
On 24 Aug 2009 at 11:50, Chris Evans wrote:
All,
Is there any way of knowing if xmail made a TLS connection for a particular
message? I've not seen anything in the log files or added to the message
header as with some other SMTP servers.
Thanks
Chris
I've seen an Xauth header and
Hi
frozlist.sh coredumps
Decided to read local mail before going to bed
tonight (daily and security reports), there was
none so checked to see if any frozen files and
had a core dump. That was with 1.27-pre08. I
had same coredump when I went back to pre06,
then back to 1.26 when frozlist
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
