Hi Gavin,
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Gav... ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Derick Rethans [mailto:der...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, 12 April 2011 6:13 AM
To: zeta-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [zeta-dev] Migration from Make to Ant
On Mon, 11
Gav... wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Gaetano Giunta [mailto:giunta.gaet...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 12 April 2011 6:07 AM
To: zeta-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [zeta-dev] Migration from Make to Ant
Jerome Renard wrote:
Hello,
I started to create an Ant based version of
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Gav... wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Jerome Renard wrote:
I started to create an Ant based version of the Makefile available in
website/
The problem with the Makefile is that it does not work at all on Mac
Os X
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Derick Rethans der...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Gav... wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Jerome Renard wrote:
I started to create an Ant based version of the Makefile available in
website/
The
Anyway it's ASF here, let's look for consensus :)
and here are my 2 cents...
have used ant for long time and like it very much. Phing by the way is
a php specific ant version.
For log4php we have used maven with success. With its multimodules it
might be a good choice for zeta also.
However,
Hi There,
The debate we got earlier [1] on this list after I posted a very early
version of the
Ant based build script showed that we were possibly going in the wrong
direction.
After chatting on IRC we realized that (some statements might look
obvious to you):
1. the actual Makefile is hard to
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Gaetano Giunta
giunta.gaet...@gmail.com wrote:
As I proposed pake in the 1szt place, no need to assert any more that I like
it enough.
+1 from here as well. We use Pake anyway for Midgard packaging and
installation. So at least Zeta Components have already
- is not XML based (Derick will appreciate that :P)
probably the only one ;-)
I will try to give Pake a try as soon as possible. But if one of you
already has experience with
Phing or Pake I would be happy to get your feedback about these tools :)
I have no experience and no preference with
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
- is not XML based (Derick will appreciate that :P)
probably the only one ;-)
Not sure if this is a joke, but xml simply has to die (TM).
I will try to give Pake a try as soon as possible. But if one of you
already has experience with
Phing or Pake I would be happy
- is not XML based (Derick will appreciate that :P)
probably the only one ;-)
Not sure if this is a joke, but xml simply has to die (TM).
No joke. And XML has some good benefits. I don't want it to die.
Probably I am oldschool.
Not a good doc by any stretch, but to hit the ground running:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
And while we are at it, consider to join the incubator.apache.org with
pake. I am pretty sure there are some supporters around.
I wouldn't mind seeing Pake and some other stuff from Alexey - like
the AppServer in
11 matches
Mail list logo
