> - is not XML based (Derick will appreciate that :P) probably the only one ;-)
> I will try to give Pake a try as soon as possible. But if one of you > already has experience with > Phing or Pake I would be happy to get your feedback about these tools :) I have no experience and no preference with Pake and Phing, but I could understand Phing very quickly (no surprise, as a ant user) and had some trouble to get into pake. I am still unsure on some points and could not use it straight away. You'll probably need to make a good documentation on Pake otherwise I can imagine that users who want to join the project might have some trouble. I don't see a benefit compared to the actual makefile in readability. If you say, Pake is easier - its just in the eye of the observer. > <this is the auto flagellation part> > I plead guilty for imposing Ant, the reason is that I have been using > it for a couple of years already and I thought it would solve problems we > got in the > Makefile. But I was wrong. > <this was the auto flagellation part> Naaa, Ant is not such bad! Trying it out was a logical consequence. It just didn't fit