Matthew Ahrens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
The best documented one is the inverted meta data tree that allows wofs to
write
only one new generation node for one modified file while ZFS needs to also
write new
nodes for all directories above the file including the
More here
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9034496
On 9/5/07, David Magda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Not sure if anyone at Sun can comment on this, but I thought it might
be of interest to the list:
This morning, NetApp filed an IP
This is my personal opinion and all, but even knowing that Sun
encourages open conversations on these mailing lists and blogs it seems to
falter common sense for people from @sun.com to be commenting on this
topic. It seems like something users should be aware of, but if I were
working
This is my personal opinion and all, but even knowing that Sun
encourages open conversations on these mailing lists and blogs it seems to
falter common sense for people from @sun.com to be commenting on this
topic. It seems like something users should be aware of, but if I were
working
Unfortunately it only comes with 4 adapters, bare metal adapters without any
dampering /silencing and so on...
...anyway I wanted to make it the most silent I could, so I suspeded all the 10
disks (8 sata 320gb and a little 2,5 pata root disk) with a flexible wire,
like I posted in this italian
At 09:33 AM 9/6/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is my personal opinion and all, but even knowing that Sun
encourages open conversations on these mailing lists and blogs it seems to
falter common sense for people from @sun.com to be commenting on this
topic. It seems like something
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007, Harold Ancell wrote:
At 09:33 AM 9/6/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is my personal opinion and all, but even knowing that Sun
encourages open conversations on these mailing lists and blogs it seems to
falter common sense for people from @sun.com to be
Playing with patent portfolios is the modern equivalent to playing the
mutually assured destruction game with nuclear missiles. Yes we all
appreciate how dangereous this game is and how high the stakes are.
But ... notice that a live/armed ballistic missile has never been
fired at a target.
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 06:20:55PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that you mention Nuclear weapons, am I really the only one who
is amused by the uproar about a B52 with nukes flying over the US?
Europe does not have the anti-nuke opinion set market cornered, ya know?
Until the Minuteman
At 11:06 AM 9/6/2007, Al Hopper wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007, Harold Ancell wrote:
At 09:33 AM 9/6/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is my personal opinion and all, but even knowing that Sun
encourages open conversations on these mailing lists and blogs it seems to
falter common sense for
Playing with patent portfolios is the modern equivalent to playing
the mutually assured destruction game with nuclear missiles. Yes
we all appreciate how dangereous this game is and how high the
stakes are. But ... notice that a live/armed ballistic missile has
never been fired at a
Hello,
I am messing around with zfs snapshots, and was wondering if it is
possible to mount a zfs snapshot. I would like to use this snapshot to
backup to tape.
Currently, I see the data in the following path:
/testjp1/.zfs/snapshot/testsnapjp
This message and its
Poulos, Joe wrote:
Hello,
I am messing around with zfs snapshots, and was wondering if it is
possible to mount a zfs snapshot. I would like to use this snapshot to
backup to tape.
Currently, I see the data in the following path:
/testjp1/.zfs/snapshot/testsnapjp
and
It really is a shot in the dark at this point, you really never know what
will happen in court (take the example of the recent court decision that
all data in RAM be held for discovery ?!WHAT, HEAD HURTS!?). But at the
end of the day, if you waited for a sure bet on any technology or
potential
Ah, thanks! I thought it may be possible to show up as a separate
mountpoint. But you're right... this is not really needed! Thanks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Darren J Moffat
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 2:14 PM
To: Poulos,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/06/2007 01:14:56 PM:
It really is a shot in the dark at this point, you really never know
what
will happen in court (take the example of the recent court decision that
all data in RAM be held for discovery ?!WHAT, HEAD HURTS!?). But at the
end of the day,
It's Columbia Pictures vs. Bunnell:
http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/torrentspy/columbia_v_bunnell_magistrate_order.pdf
The Register syndicated a Security Focus article that summarizes the
potential impact of the court decision:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/08/litigation_data_retention/
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 01:18:27PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/06/2007 01:14:56 PM:
It really is a shot in the dark at this point, you really never know
what
will happen in court (take the example of the recent court decision that
all data in RAM be held
If that's the correct reading of the story then the story is very badly
written. Or am I misreading the story?
Hmmm, the order itself goes on and on about RAM. I think the judge
should have been clearer that the issue is the specific data, as opposed
to generic RAM contents.
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 01:38:22PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If that's the correct reading of the story then the story is very badly
written. Or am I misreading the story?
Hmmm, the order itself goes on and on about RAM. I think the judge
should have been clearer that the issue
Has anyone here attempted to store their MS Exchange data store on a
ZFS pool? If so, could you please tell me about your setup? A friend
is looking for a NAS solution, and may be interested in a ZFS box
instead of a netapp or something like that.
Thanks.
On 9/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is my personal opinion and all, but even knowing that Sun
encourages open conversations on these mailing lists and blogs it seems to
falter common sense for people from @sun.com to be commenting on this
topic. It seems like
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 04:16:50PM -0400, Jonathan Edwards wrote:
On Sep 6, 2007, at 14:48, Nicolas Williams wrote:
Allowing for technical illiteracy in judges I think the obvious
interpretation is that discoverable data should be retained and that
but it exists only in RAM is not a defense,
On Sep 6, 2007, at 14:48, Nicolas Williams wrote:
Exactly the articles point -- rulings have consequences outside of
the
original case. The intent may have been to store logs for web server
access (logical and prudent request) but the ruling states that
RAM albeit
working memory is no
That but it existed only in RAM in my servers should not be a defense
for failing to retain discoverable evidence is distinct from the issue
of what constitutes discoverable evidence.
But only if you were told you needed to retain the data in the
first place. How can you be faulted for not
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 10:45:01PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That but it existed only in RAM in my servers should not be a defense
for failing to retain discoverable evidence is distinct from the issue
of what constitutes discoverable evidence.
But only if you were told you needed to
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Matthew Ahrens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
The best documented one is the inverted meta data tree that allows wofs to
write
only one new generation node for one modified file while ZFS needs to also
write new
nodes for all directories above the
Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 14:26 -0700, Richard Elling wrote:
AFAIK, nobody has characterized resilvering, though this is about the 4th
time this week someone has brought the topic up. Has anyone done work here
that we don't know about? If so, please speak up :-)
On 9/6/07, Diego Righi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...anyway I wanted to make it the most silent I could, so I suspeded all the
10 disks
Warning: unfounded speculation ahead.
I've heard that this can cause performance issues and undue wear on
the drive. The reasoning is that since the arm
Casper,
Do you have a reference for all data in RAM most be held. I guess we
need to build COW RAM as well.
Is that one of those genetic hybrids?
Regards... Sean.
BTW: I remember the days when only RAS and CAS kept your data in memory
intact ;-)
On 9/4/07 4:34 PM, Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andy,
my comments below...
note that I didn't see zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org in the CC for the
original...
Andy Lubel wrote:
Hi All,
I have been asked to implement a zfs based solution using storedge 6130 and
im chasing my
Tim Spriggs wrote:
Hello,
I think I have gained sufficient fool status for testing the
fool-proof-ness of zfs. I have a cluster of T1000 servers running
Solaris 10 and two x4100's running an OpenSolaris dist (Nexenta) which
is at b68. Each T1000 hosts several zones each of which
Agreed !
However, you may be able to lower the sound ever so slightly more by
staggering the drives so that every other one is upside down, spinning the
opposite direction and thus minimizing accumulative rotational vibration.
I had to make a makeshift temporary server when our NAS gateway
Neil Perrin wrote:
Tim Spriggs wrote:
Hello,
I think I have gained sufficient fool status for testing the
fool-proof-ness of zfs. I have a cluster of T1000 servers running
Solaris 10 and two x4100's running an OpenSolaris dist (Nexenta)
which is at b68. Each T1000 hosts several
On 9/6/07 2:51 PM, Joe S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone here attempted to store their MS Exchange data store on a
ZFS pool? If so, could you please tell me about your setup? A friend
is looking for a NAS solution, and may be interested in a ZFS box
instead of a netapp or something like
Will Murnane wrote:
On 9/6/07, Diego Righi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...anyway I wanted to make it the most silent I could, so I suspeded all the
10 disks
Warning: unfounded speculation ahead.
I've heard that this can cause performance issues and undue wear on
the drive. The reasoning is
Unfortunately it only comes with 4 adapters, bare
metal adapters without any dampering /silencing and
so on...
...anyway I wanted to make it the most silent I
could, so I suspeded all the 10 disks (8 sata 320gb
and a little 2,5 pata root disk) with a flexible
wire, like I posted in this
37 matches
Mail list logo
