Will Murnane wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:43, Glaser, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess what I was wondering if there was a direct method rather than the
overhead of ssh.
On receiving machine:
nc -l 12345 | zfs recv mypool/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and on sending machine:
zfs
Does anyone know a tool that can look over a dataset and give
duplication statistics? I'm not looking for something incredibly
efficient but I'd like to know how much it would actually benefit our
dataset: HiRISE has a large set of spacecraft data (images) that could
potentially have large
Look, it's obvious this guy talks about himself as if he is the person
he is addressing. Please stop taking this personally and feeding the troll.
can you guess? wrote:
Bill - I don't think there's a point in continuing
that discussion.
I think you've finally found something upon
Yet another prime example.
can you guess? wrote:
Please see below for an example.
Ah - I see that you'd rather be part of the problem than part of the
solution. Perhaps you're also one of those knuckle-draggers who believes
that a woman with the temerity to leave her home after
trolling
can you guess? wrote:
he isn't being
paid by NetApp.. think bigger
O frabjous day! Yet *another* self-professed psychic, but one whose internal
voices offer different counsel.
While I don't have to be psychic myself to know that they're *all* wrong
(that's an
troll bait
Rich Teer wrote:
I should know better than to reply to a troll, but I can't let this
personal attack stand. I know Al, and I can tell you for a fact that
he is *far* from technically incompentent.
Judging from the length of your diatribe (which I didn't bother reading),
you seem
Hi Boris,
When you create a Solaris2 Partition under x86, Solaris sees the
partition as a disk that you can cut into slices. You can find a list of
disks available via the format command.
A slice is much like a partition but there is a difference; that's most
or all you really need to know to
Cyril Plisko wrote:
On Nov 12, 2007 5:51 PM, Neelakanth Nadgir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could always replace this device by another one of same, or
bigger size using zpool replace.
Indeed. Provided that I always have an unused device of same or
bigger size, which is seldom the
In the previous and current responses, you seem quite determined of
others misconceptions. Given that fact and the first paragraph of your
response below, I think you can figure out why nobody on this list will
reply to you again.
can you guess? wrote:
No, you aren't cool, and no it isn't
Chill. It's a filesystem. If you don't like it, don't use it.
Sincere Regards,
-Tim
can you guess? wrote:
can you guess? wrote:
...
Most of the balance of your post isn't addressed in
any detail because it carefully avoids the
fundamental issues that I raised:
Joe Little wrote:
On 11/2/07, MC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I consider myself an early adopter of ZFS and pushed
it hard on this
list and in real life with regards to iSCSI
integration, zfs
performance issues with latency there of, and how
best to use it with
NFS. Well, I finally get to
Jonathan Loran wrote:
Richard Elling wrote:
Jonathan Loran wrote:
snip...
Do not assume that a compressed file system will send compressed.
IIRC, it
does not.
Let's say, if it were possible to detect the remote compression support,
couldn't we send it compressed?
Yeah, that would have saved me several weeks ago.
Samuel Borgman wrote:
Hi,
Having my 700Gb one disk ZFS crashing on me created ample need for a recovery
tool.
So I spent the weekend creating a tool that lets you list directories and
copy files from any pool on a one disk ZFS
Would the bootloader have issues here? On x86 I would imagine that you
would have to reload grub, would a similar thing need to be done on SPARC?
Ivan Wang wrote:
Erik Trimble wrote:
After both drives are replaced, you will automatically see the
additional space.
I believe
zdb?
Damon Atkins wrote:
ZFS should allow 31+NULL chars for a comment against each disk.
This would work well with the host name string (I assume is max_hostname
255+NULL)
If a disk fails it should report c6t4908029d0 failed comment from
disk, it should also remember the comment until
James C. McPherson wrote:
Gregory Shaw wrote:
Hi. I'd like to request a feature be added to zfs. Currently, on
SAN attached disk, zpool shows up with a big WWN for the disk. If
ZFS (or the zpool command, in particular) had a text field for
arbitrary information, it would be
Gino wrote:
The x4500 is very sweet and the only thing stopping
us from buying two
instead of another shelf is the fact that we have
lost pools on Sol10u3
servers and there is no easy way of making two pools
redundant (ie the
complexity of clustering.) Simply sending incremental
Paul B. Henson wrote:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Tim Spriggs wrote:
The x4500 is very sweet and the only thing stopping us from buying two
instead of another shelf is the fact that we have lost pools on Sol10u3
servers and there is no easy way of making two pools redundant (ie the
complexity
eric kustarz wrote:
On Sep 21, 2007, at 3:50 PM, Tim Spriggs wrote:
m2# zpool create test mirror iscsi_lun1 iscsi_lun2
m2# zpool export test
m1# zpool import -f test
m1# reboot
m2# reboot
Since I haven't actually looked into what problem caused your pools to
become damaged/lost, i can
Andy Lubel wrote:
On 9/20/07 3:49 PM, Paul B. Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Richard Elling wrote:
That would also be my preference, but if I were forced to use hardware
RAID, the additional loss of storage for ZFS redundancy would be painful.
Would anyone
Paul B. Henson wrote:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Tim Spriggs wrote:
We are in a similar situation. It turns out that buying two thumpers is
cheaper per TB than buying more shelves for an IBM N7600. I don't know
about power/cooling considerations yet though.
It's really a completely
Paul B. Henson wrote:
Is it comparable storage though? Does it use SATA drives similar to the
x4500, or more expensive/higher performance FC drives? Is it one of the
models that allows connecting dual clustered heads and failing over the
storage between them?
I agree the x4500 is a sweet
zfs get creation pool|filesystem|snapshot
Poulos, Joe wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to find out what the timestamp is of a specific
snapshot? Currently, I have a system with 5 snapshots, and would like
to know the timestamp as to when it was created. Thanks JOr
This message and
was created
earlier?
This would be helpful to know in order to predict the effect of a
rollback or promote command.
Fred Oliver
Tim Spriggs wrote:
zfs get creation pool|filesystem|snapshot
Poulos, Joe wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to find out what the timestamp
I'm far from an expert but my understanding is that the zil is spread
across the whole pool by default so in theory the one drive could slow
everything down. I don't know what it would mean in this respect to keep
the PATA drive as a hot spare though.
-Tim
Christopher Gibbs wrote:
Anyone?
Neil Perrin wrote:
Tim Spriggs wrote:
Hello,
I think I have gained sufficient fool status for testing the
fool-proof-ness of zfs. I have a cluster of T1000 servers running
Solaris 10 and two x4100's running an OpenSolaris dist (Nexenta)
which is at b68. Each T1000 hosts several
Hello,
I think I have gained sufficient fool status for testing the
fool-proof-ness of zfs. I have a cluster of T1000 servers running
Solaris 10 and two x4100's running an OpenSolaris dist (Nexenta) which
is at b68. Each T1000 hosts several zones each of which has its own
zpool associated
27 matches
Mail list logo
