o,
> when you find that also the newest tree gives you a working system,
> you would tar up that /usr/portage instead and remove the old one.
> This is the dead simple, brute force way, no overlay required. :)
No, no, no that's wy too much work.
Archive a portage tree by
ions, and especially to TomWij and Samuli for their extra effort.
For my future reference, could someone point me to the documentation
that provides for the situation where an application installed under
layman is migrated to the portage tree? I understand now the procedure
seems simple, but with
ctory
'/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-5.3.0/work/build'
rm -f stage_current
make[3]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-5.3.0/work/build'
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
Bootstrap comparison failure
e_current
> make[3]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-5.3.0/work/build'
> Comparing stages 2 and 3
> warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
> warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
> Bootstrap comparison failure!
> gcc/tree-ssa-threadedge.o differs
>
ld, as soon as you have a system in a working state, tar up
the entire /usr/portage tree, and then, when you find an upgrade
has broken an essential package, untar the ball over your new tree,
and re-emerge the old version of the package. Once a month or so,
when you find that also the newest t
Mark Knecht wrote:
> At that point it's gone. I cannot put into an overlay
> what I don't have. Probably most frustrating has been that I
> don't know it will be removed until it's been removed.
You could, as soon as you have a system in a working state, tar up
the
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 19:48:35 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I've downloaded todays snapshot of protage and extracted
> gimp-perl. Placed it in my portage tree. Then unmasked it with
> package.keyword file and ran `emerge -v -p gimp-perl and then without
> -p.
>
> The build
/portage/sys-devel/gcc-5.3.0/work/build'
> > rm -f stage_current
> > make[3]: Leaving directory
> '/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-5.3.0/work/build'
> > Comparing stages 2 and 3
> > warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
> > warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.
This section is snipped one of Allen M. posts on the monster gentoo
health thread (last paragraph is where my topic starts:
[...]
Archive a portage tree by all means. But if an ebuild is removed that a
user want to keep, the solution is so simple it's amazing. Copy the
ebuild to /usr/
7;t know it will be removed until it's been removed.
> >
> > You could, as soon as you have a system in a working state, tar
> > up the entire /usr/portage tree, [...]
>
> No, no, no that's wy too much work.
On the contrary, it's very little work: ju
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:39:23 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > You could, as soon as you have a system in a working state, tar up
> > the entire /usr/portage tree,
> Yes, I think this is a simple answer. A bit difficult for 5-7 machines
> if I do it separately for each, but not to
Nikos Chantziaras [10-04-04 08:28]:
> On 04/04/2010 08:18 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >this is no security issue in sense of attacks...it is related
> >to the consistency of the system.
> >
> >Simple question (and may be compli
I've been using kdevelop-4.7.0 (unstable) for a while and it was working just
fine. Then about a couple weeks ago it's ebuild got deleted from the portage
tree and replaced with kdevelop-4.7.1 which is broken (I have issues with
remote debugging).
Why does a good ebuild gets repla
Good afternoon all,
Is there a simple way to determine the order initscripts are executed,
taking into account ineed, iuse, before, etc...? Perhaps something that
would show a tree structure similar to emerge -auDt.
Thanks,
John
--
Contrary to the lie machine, the world is not safer
ble-breaks-the-tree-broken masked.
> Its probably simple enough but not apparent to me.
You could add media-libs/mesa to /etc/portage/package.unmask, but that will
lead you into the (also package.mask'd) modularized X.
Modularized X is obviously not ready for unstable, and the version of m
ler and
>makes
>> sense.
>
>If you use a simple script like mine you won't fall into that again:
>
># cat /usr/local/bin/sync-update
>emerge --sync; echo
>eix-update; echo
> emerge $1 $2 $3 -avuDU --jobs=24 --load-average=48 --keep-going world
>ec
parabel for the technically affine...
If you mean someone syncs against your system, I don't see how it would
matter as to whether portages tree is in /usr or anywhere else. When
you move the tree, change the config to point to the new location.
My point was, if you don't li
On Sunday 11 March 2007 15:01:27 Steve Long wrote:
> > I don't know what you mean by making Portage recognize the software
> > installed this way. Do you want Portage to be able to uninstall and/or
> > upgrade this software? If so, the simple answer is you it can't do
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 21:09:27 - (UTC), Martin Vaeth wrote:
> > eix reports USE flags for all versions in the tree
>
> Try eix -l
Nice one!
--
Neil Bothwick
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.
pgp4BKMqb3_Ei.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
putting it in the official tree. There are just some pieces
of software that I want that are not even in the testing tree.
The devmanual is a good place to start. If you use IRC then
#gentoo-dev-help at freenode is a good place to get more help...
Also, search Bugzilla and the
On 27/02/15 19:07, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
>
> I've been using kdevelop-4.7.0 (unstable) for a while and it was working just
> fine. Then about a couple weeks ago it's ebuild got deleted from the portage
> tree and replaced with kdevelop-4.7.1 which is broken (I have
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:09:31 +0200, Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> On Thursday 22 October 2009 15:42:41 Johannes Kimmel wrote:
>> Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > is there an easy way to unmerge all packages which are no longer in
>> > the curre
On 04/04/2010 10:07 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras [10-04-04 08:28]:
On 04/04/2010 08:18 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
this is no security issue in sense of attacks...it is related
to the consistency of the system.
Simple question (and may be complicate to answer
tomatically. Right now if I install an unstable package by
> keywording a specific version and it gets deleted you get downgraded
> the next time you run emerge -vauDN so you have no simple way of
> going back to your working configuration since the ebuild is gone.
>
You can look in t
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:04:33 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [...]
> Archive a portage tree by all means. But if an ebuild is removed that
> a user want to keep, the solution is so simple it's amazing. Copy the
> ebuild to /usr/local/portage in the correct direc
r/local/ is the only thing I do special. The /home dir
is just me. So I'm trying to keep this simple and get
it working on 3 old boxes..
Then I'm going to put CEPH (a distributed file system)
across all three on them to run a simple Apache-mesos cluster.
https://github.com/trozamon/ove
ee, portage also considers the entire tree and -u tells it
> > > to not remerge things that don't need updating.
> >
> > Um, -e is --emptytree, no? -t is just --tree. But yeah, according to his
> > first email, James did leave out -N the second time around ("e
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> /mnt/distfiles ext3/4 (shared via nfs)
>>
>
> Why do you separate the distfiles from the portage tree?
>
> Rgds,
distfiles has a tendency to grow large over the years. IIRC nothing
cleans it up automatically so havi
Hello,
So I used rackview many years ago. It's ok, simple to use.
It has been tree-cleansed. ok. So I went to the (gentoo) attic::
https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/app-admin/
rackview/?hideattic=0
rackview-0.09-r3.ebuild seems to have been removed from the
> > > the filesystems have been mounted.
> > >
> > > Some sort of early boot rules file would need to be used to handle
> > > things like setting up symlinks for block devices to avoid breaking
> > > some users' fstabs.
> >
> > Yes,
"Albert W. Hopkins" writes:
> On Sat, 2011-11-26 at 17:01 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> Creating a gentoo vm has always been a serious pita to me. I'm sure
>> there will be those who claim its `simple'.
>>
>> Simple or not, I want to bypass it
On 04/23/2016 10:42 AM, hw wrote:
>
> Has it become entirely impossible to share a directory tree and the
> files in it with multiple users when Linux is involved? This should be
> a very simple thing to accomplish.
>
It was never possible. It's ridiculous, but t
Maybe I'm barking up the wrong tree. I want to have a record of my
specimens and preparations, in a format that can be retrieved in various
ways, sorted, and printed. A record, like a card file. Nothing
compilcated, don't need a server. I'm thinking emacs data base. I guess
> > You can copy the ebuild to your own private overlay
> > > > ( /usr/local/portage ) make your changes there, and bump the version
> > > > number slightly.
> > >
> > > No need to bump the version number, overlays take priority over the
> > > standard
On Sunday, March 01, 2015 3:01:09 AM Michael Palimaka wrote:
> On 27/02/15 19:07, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > I've been using kdevelop-4.7.0 (unstable) for a while and it was working
just
> > fine. Then about a couple weeks ago it's ebuild got deleted
Hello,
I'm looking for some EAPI-6 examples or ebuild templates to
to review.
Is there a simple way to parse the portage tree for EAPI=6 examples
regardless if they are testing, stable or still just beta in a git
repo somewhere? Maybe a particular dev has already revised a group
of ebuild
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:50:02 +
James wrote -
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking for some EAPI-6 examples or ebuild templates to
> to review.
>
>
> Is there a simple way to parse the portage tree for EAPI=6 examples
> regardless if they are testing, stable or st
On Thursday 22 October 2009 15:58:17 Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> > depclean only removes packages that it knows for a fact are no longer
> > needed.
> > This means
> >
> > - not in world
> > - not linked to by anything
> > - not depended on by anything
>
add a delay in rc.conf as well, so you don't directly edit
> the init script.
>
> Regards,
> Arve
The gatling webserver is rather simple with no logging or debugging options
that I have found. The rc.conf log does not capture gatling's internal code
crash, so I'm non
ine in make.conf on the second rig. This is my
rsyncd.conf on the main rig:
# Simple example for enabling your own local rsync server
[gentoo-portage]
path = /usr/portage
comment = Gentoo Portage tree
exclude = /distfiles /packages
If you want to include distfiles, just remove it from the excl
On 2019-12-19, Thomas Schweikle wrote:
>>> > On 2019-12-18, (Nuno Silva) <
>>> > nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > The EAPI problem is in a package that is pulled as a dependency of
>>> > > portage.
>>> &
. Probably most frustrating has been that I
> > > don't know it will be removed until it's been removed.
> >
> > You could, as soon as you have a system in a working state, tar
> > up the entire /usr/portage tree, [...]
>
> No, no, no that's wy
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 10:17:07AM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
> >> /mnt/distfiles ext3/4 (shared via nfs)
> >>
> >
> > Why do you separate the distfiles from the portage tree?
> >
> > Rgds,
distfiles has a tendency to grow large over the years. IIRC nothing
> cleans it up automatically so having it separate is just a simple
> safety mechanism to not run out of disk space after emerge -fDuN
> @world, etc.
>
> I do it also.
>
> - Mark
It is also because the portage
; what the differences are. jinja was a nice example, because there was a
> > collision of the same package with itself! The only difference was the
> > PYTHON_TARGET. I hoped someone could explain how I could force
> > equivalency in that simple case.
>
> You need to
early boot rules file would need to be used to handle
> > things like setting up symlinks for block devices to avoid breaking
> > some users' fstabs.
>
> Yes, which means "udev" would need to be split into:
> * devd (which controls the /dev-tree)
> * p
Sounds like you want to use a spreadsheet. You try OpenOffice?
On Nov 10, 2007 6:55 PM, Alan E. Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe I'm barking up the wrong tree. I want to have a record of my
> specimens and preparations, in a format that can be retrieved in various
&g
On Donnerstag, 26. April 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> · fire-eyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Over a whole system this can
> > add up to a few dozen more MB of space usable.
>
> This Depends largely on the "type" of files. I've got my portage
> tree
The 23/11/11, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> I also got "random memory corruption" when compiling large packages with
> simple kernel configurations and no "out-of-tree" modules present on the
> system.
>
> Do you have any evidence to proof that this randomness is actu
really isn't a big deal. You'll just need
to copy the ebuild to your local overlay and preserve the distfiles.
Portage makes it really simple to manage packages outside of the main
portage tree. And if you have a problem with the ebuild, it is fairly
easy to find someone willing to hel
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 16:15:11 +0200
"Dutch Ingraham" wrote:
> If you could point me to the proper command set to make the switch,
> I'd appreciate it.
Remove the overlay (`layman -d mate`) and then do a world upgrade.
It is as simple as that, as it'll upgrade all thos
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 17:52:45 +
Andrew Syrewicze wrote:
> Daniel da Veiga wrote:
> > On 8/8/06, Andrew Syrewicze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hey eveyone. This is probably a really simple question. I've used debian
> >> for many years and recnetly mad
On 8/15/06, Matthias Guede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ryan Tandy wrote:
> Jed R. Mallen wrote:
>> hello,
>>
>> i've got a gentoo box with no internet connection at home.
>> i have broadband at the office, but running WinXP.
>>
>> can i download
On 9/19/06, Alon Keren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My aim is to have the ability to regularly build and maintain
completely customized Linux systems.
This should be possible by using your own local portage tree (probably
based initially on Gentoo's tree) that you update somewhat ma
t
> running digests, etc., and being a user I'm not all that interested in
> that stuff.
The structure isn't any different from the tree. In fact most of what's
required in the tree doesn't need to be in an overlay.
If you have PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage&qu
hat there's nothing to update. And it does that every time, even
>directly in succession and with the caches warm.
>
>Is it just me?
You don't say when your baseline was, but the complexity of resolving
the package tree has increased quite a bit over the last year due to
new feat
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 04:37:48 + (UTC)
James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Iliev ilievnet.com> writes:
>
> > > Close. You can't use win32codecs on amd64 at all, unless you are
> > > using a 32 bit binary program with them. Simple as that. So VLC
/usr/local/portage ) make your changes there, and bump the version
> > > number slightly.
> >
> > No need to bump the version number, overlays take priority over the
> > standard tree when there are equal version numbers.
> >
>
> I knew I forgot something so s
Markus Döbele wrote:
Can't the rest be automated too?
I mean creating the directories
and to check first if portage is installed?
Would be easier for the users.
Then a link should be created in PATH thet you can type laby everywhere.
Once the ebuild is officially in the portage tree,
ving the same problem, here's exactly
what I did to solve this:
- Create a local overlay
- copy the mail-mta/netmail directory from portage tree
- wget http://www.ckdhr.com/ckd/qmail-103.patch
to the files directory.
- copy netmail-1.06.ebuild to netmail-1.06-r1.ebuild
- insert "e
Stroller stellar.eclipse.co.uk> writes:
> Stroller.
> [1]
http://thommck.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/youve-got-emoji-smilie-characters-discovered-in-a-font/
> [2] http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/
> [3] https://github.com/android/platform_frameworks_base/tree/master/data/fonts
>
Category: Work From Home
Earn Rs25,000 per month on internet working for only an hour a day. Excellent
opportunity to turn your PC into an earning machine. Simple online jobs, form
filling jobs,typing jobs, copy and paste jobs, writing jobs, online data entry
jobs, online survey jobs. For
Michael Orlitzky schrieb:
On 04/23/2016 10:42 AM, hw wrote:
Has it become entirely impossible to share a directory tree and the
files in it with multiple users when Linux is involved? This should be
a very simple thing to accomplish.
It was never possible. It's ridiculous, but there
,
>> being a laptop trying to update/install when out and about is both very
>> slow and network intensive through a vpn - again, it works but is even
>> slower to the point of not always being practical
>>
>> Is there a way to localise/speedup portage scanning parts o
On 3/10/07, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello Everyone,
I will begin by stating my problem. I have the source code (in
*.tar.bz2 format) for a couple of pieces of software that are not in the
Portage tree at all. I would like to c
Hi,
I'm using mailman (stable 2.1.33) for several mailing lists.
Since there seems to be only a Python 2.7 version, mailman
is now masked and will soon be removed from the tree.
I have already copied the mailman ebuild to a local overlay,
but that's surely not the best idea in th
sted and either inserted in the tree or an overlay. i.e.
waay too complex for what is really just a simple list.
> So I could create a set called network and put things like Kppp,
> ppp, wireshark and all the networky things in there for my use alone.
Yes
> I
> assume that the
e it was updated without changing the version
>> number), or will the newer ebuild always win out, whether it's in
>> overlay or main Portage?
>
>
> The overlay takes priority, even if the file date in the main portage
> tree is newer.
OK, now that I'm think
Nick Rout wrote:
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 17:52:45 +
Andrew Syrewicze wrote:
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
On 8/8/06, Andrew Syrewicze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey eveyone. This is probably a really simple question. I've used debian
for
this last mail went through smoothly and without any trouble in log
> files.
>
> Since I got private mails from others having the same problem, here's
exactly
> what I did to solve this:
>
> - Create a local overlay
>
> - copy the mail-mta/netmail directory from portage
Daniel Iliev ilievnet.com> writes:
> > Close. You can't use win32codecs on amd64 at all, unless you are
> > using a 32 bit binary program with them. Simple as that. So VLC
> > cannot use 32 bit binary codecs, unless someone made a vlc 32-bit
> > binary and put
ts/desktop/kde/make.defaults.
However, emerge -p system doesn't pull in any KDE packages here, although
it does include qt, so this must be covered by another of your USE flags,
which requires something that in turn requires KDE. Run it again with
--tree to see what's really going on.
--
N
help me make a good choice.
>>
>> Please, disparage with details! ;-)
>
> I've already said "random memory curruption". "random" is the key word
> explaining why not much details can be given. :)
I also got "random memory corruption" when compiling la
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 10:17:07AM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote
>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>
>> >> /mnt/distfiles ext3/4 (shared via nfs)
>> >>
>> >
>> >
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:57:57 +0800
W.Kenworthy wrote:
> Here's another way I started using (~1 month) and it seems both simple
> and problem free. Run http-replicator on the machine with good net
> access, then point the rest at it. Its a distfile caching proxy and
> best of a
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> I just found out about sunrise overlay and I've added a few overlays
> into my tree.
cool :)
> Seems that eix doesn't know about it. How can I inform eix about it?
>
> when I do a update-eix --dump I do see that I didn't exclude any trees.
>
_targets_python3_3 python_targets_python3_4
> python_targets_python3_5))
>
> Yet there are some that are still unhappy with 3.5. This makes me
> really annoyed and I was wondering if it was possible to write a
> simple script to add python_targets_python3_5 where needed. Would this
> brea
On Sun, 6 Sep 2020 10:59:42 +0200, Matthias Hanft wrote:
> On the other hand, there seems to be a mailman 3 version
> (which is not yet in the portage tree), but I could
> install it manually of course (though that sounds pretty
> complicated?!), and there are some update doc
I would suggest "make mrproper" to clean the source tree. Ensure that
the .config has been backed up because it will be deleted as a result.
I had no module "kvm" because one was built as module and one into the
kernel. I now did mrproper and recompile both kvm and kvm_amd into th
book page)
> but required that a full-blown ebuild be written. Which then had to be
> manifested and either inserted in the tree or an overlay. i.e.
> waay too complex for what is really just a simple list.
>
>
>> So I could create a set called network and put things like Kpp
ommand to make it stop and print an
>> error message when encountering a conflict rather than look for a
>> solution. Then you can 'help' out by manually resolving any
>> conflicts by adding package versions to /etc/portage/package.mask
>> . Preferably try this *af
ture.
> unless you stick --force in your pull
Unfortunately, it is not that simple: git pull --force only works if
the checked out tree is old enough (in which case git pull without --force
would have worked also, BTW).
The correct thing to do if git pull failed is:
git update-index --r
e that don't use package managers.
> I almost always install into my home directory for programs that
> aren't in portage (or make my own ebuild if it is a simple one). Or
> depending on what program it is, create a user for it and run it under
> that user account so it can
ge.
>
>
> sunflo ~ # find /usr -name Client.pm
> /usr/lib64/perl5/5.20.1/CPAN/HTTP/Client.pm
> sunflo ~ #
>
>
> Any ideas?
>
>
The module above probably comes from the pkg below:
equery -q b /usr/lib/perl5/5.20.1/CPAN/HTTP/Client.pm
dev-lang/perl-5.20.1-r4
Looks like t
pends largely on the "type" of files. I've got my portage
>> tree on a reiserfs, and in comparison to ext3, it saves couple
>> 100 (one-zero-zero) megs!
>>
>>
>
> back in the good old days, when 10gb was big for a harddrive, I saved 2GB by
> using
ssage is pretty clear. You need to upgrade portage first. Try
> `emerge -1 portage`. This should take care of the EAPI message.
The EAPI problem is in a package that is pulled as a dependency of
portage.
Unless there's a simple hack to solve this, you will need to use older
ebuilds or s
copy file if they
are already existing, and are the same. It's quite usefull when using a
copy over a network, or even locally when spurious error can occur and
especially when the filesystem is live and file may be modified during
the copy.
To copy large file tree rsync is, for me,
fantastic.
The first is handled by a simple tool that I developed, using a vi-macro
to invoke on a symbol ...
I could conjure it up from somewhere, but not today.
It will search a directory tree. It doesn't use an index, but in my
experience, the performance was acceptable.
(there's
3.5. This makes me really annoyed and I was wondering if
it was possible to write a simple script to add python_targets_python3_5 where
needed. Would this break anything, and if no, why can't the maintainers or some
portage-tree admin do it?
Of course there might be some other barri
On Mon Oct 24 10:44:24 2016, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> My use case is basic: 2 home computers, I do emerge et. al. on the
> faster one and produce binary packages to be used on the other one,
> which doesn't even need distfiles, just portage tree plus binary
> packages. I copy st
; latest security updates) you need to update your system regularly. Since
> Portage only checks the ebuilds in your Portage tree you first have to
> update your Portage tree.
>
> Code Listing 2: Updating the Portage tree
> # emerge --sync
>
> When your Portage tree is updated, you
ged to the same user. Or what
would I need to do?
Has it become entirely impossible to share a directory tree and the
files in it with multiple users when Linux is involved? This should be
a very simple thing to accomplish.
Michael [Plouj] Ploujnikov wrote:
> On 3/10/07, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I will begin by stating my problem. I have the source code (in
>> *.tar.bz2 format) for a couple of pieces of software that are not in the
>> Portage tree at all. I would like to compi
o
> installs from my system instead downloading from mirrors?
>
> Thanks in advance!
Setting up a local rsync mirror for a portage tree is fairly simple,
you share the working tree at /usr/portage on a local server to
the network and make sure the server is up-to-date before syncing
d have expected, assuming this is a simple issue that
packages should now be dependent on openjade and not jade, that the
portage tree would have been updated to reflect this? Is this planned?
I wonder why it seems to have taken so long?
Steve
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
James wrote:
Hello,
I need to be able to find which packages use a particular flag.
"gpac" to be specific:
Enable GPAC support when exporting to 3GPP format.
Any simple/global tools to find and list each and every
package available on Gentoo that has this flag as a option?
The
all, unless you are using a 32 bit
binary program with them. Simple as that. So VLC cannot use 32 bit binary
codecs, unless someone made a vlc 32-bit binary and put it in the tree.
Steve
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 06 Nov 2011 13:21:33 -0600, Dale wrote:
> > Odd thing. I never noticed they were symlinks. A simple `sudo cp ...`
> > does the right thing here. Did you use `cp -a`, maybe through an
> > alias?
>
> I do use -av out of habit. That habit started when I was copy
;
> > You can copy the ebuild to your own private overlay
> > ( /usr/local/portage ) make your changes there, and bump the version
> > number slightly.
>
> No need to bump the version number, overlays take priority over the
> standard tree when there are equal version numbers.
>
I knew I forgot something so simple >.<
Thanks!
Hmmm... so, @waltdnes, you should modify the procedure a bit, there...
Rgds,
> > You can copy the ebuild to your own private overlay
> > > > ( /usr/local/portage ) make your changes there, and bump the version
> > > > number slightly.
> > >
> > > No need to bump the version number, overlays take priority over the
> > > standard
1 - 100 of 501 matches
Mail list logo
