On Monday, 10 July 2023 02:25:43 BST Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 08/07/2023 11:33, Dale wrote:
> > that excessively long qt package
>
> Off-topic, but just in case you mean qtwebengine, I was able to get rid
> of it by putting "-webengine" in my USE flags. After
On Monday, 10 July 2023 04:45:52 BST Dale wrote:
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > On 08/07/2023 11:33, Dale wrote:
> >> that excessively long qt package
> >
> > Off-topic, but just in case you mean qtwebengine, I was able to get
> > rid of it by putting "-
Peter,
On Tuesday, 2023-05-02 15:04:54 +0100, you wrote:
> ...
> Meanwhile, is it possible to set things up so that, say, qtwebengine is never
> compiled at the same time as anything else? I don't want to rely on my
> noticing and intervening, and besides, it isn't a
Raphael MD writes:
> I'm trying to update KDE, but the emerge is stopping at qtwebengine-5.12.5
> compile process.
>
> Here is the compile log.
>
> https://pastebin.com/wKbJuAAS
try to emerge a newer dev-libs/mpfr before qtwebengine.
--
https://www.rohleder.de/ -
On Tue, 2023-05-02 at 19:06 +0200, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> What about
>
> # emerge -1u qtwebengine && emerge -u @world
>
> This will first update any dependencies of "qtwebengine" and only update
> "qtwebengine" itself when all its dependencies
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 05:15:41PM +0300, Alexey Eschenko wrote
> Thank you. Didn't think about that. Don't know why though. My
> MAKEOPTS was "-j32". Looks like that was too many for package like
> qtwebengine. Solved the problem with creating specific environment
>
While at it. Unrelated really but why not. Why does genlop -c show two
running for this?
(chroot) root@fireball / # genlop -c
Currently merging 200 out of 257
* dev-qt/qtwebengine-5.15.12_p20240122
current merge time: 1 hour, 22 minutes and 33 seconds.
ETA: 4 hours, 58
Thank you. Didn't think about that. Don't know why though.My MAKEOPTS was "-j32". Looks like that was too many for package like qtwebengine.Solved the problem with creating specific environment for qtwebengine and setting it up in /etc/portage/package.env/It was vry long bu
On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:19:24 +0300, Alexey Eschenko wrote:
> For some time I have problems with dev-qt/qtwebengine (at least 5.12.3)
> build. As far as I can see it fails to build due to memory exhaustion.
> Although I have 32 GB of RAM (at least 20 of them is almost always
> free
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019, at 14:19, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 05:15:41PM +0300, Alexey Eschenko wrote
> > Thank you. Didn't think about that. Don't know why though. My
> > MAKEOPTS was "-j32". Looks like that was too many for package like
>
Hello,
I'm trying to update KDE, but the emerge is stopping at qtwebengine-5.12.5
compile process.
Here is the compile log.
https://pastebin.com/wKbJuAAS
dmesg
http://dpaste.com/27D5XHK
emerge --info
http://dpaste.com/2VKVS57
Many Thanks
M.S. Raphael Mejias Dias
Nuclear Eng
next days but up to
> now I can say that the
> > switch to 17.0 is a _lot_ less painful than switching major
> compiler version.
> >
> > raffaele
> >
> >
>
>
> I'm having trouble with these:
>
> net-libs/w
On 6/11/20 7:45 AM, Michael wrote:
> I figured since qtwebengine uses the same rendering engine and I spend enough
> time compiling that package anyway, because KDE won't do without it, I might
> as well ditch Chromium. I haven't looked back. ;-)
Since you already have qtw
Hello list,
On this box I have this:
# grep '\-j' /etc/portage/make.conf
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--jobs --load-average=4 [...] "
MAKEOPTS="-j4 -l4"
That seems to work well, except for a 20s period at the beginning of emerging
qtwebengine, during which CPU load goes
te build environment with decreased job count value and it looks promissing.I'll leave the message with results in the reply to that message. 13.06.2019, 14:13, "Neil Bothwick" :On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:19:24 +0300, Alexey Eschenko wrote: For some time I have problems with dev-qt/qtwebeng
On Thursday, 21 November 2019 17:35:30 GMT Raphael MD wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to update KDE, but the emerge is stopping at qtwebengine-5.12.5
> compile process.
I don't know if your error is related to the gcc version you're using. Better
switch to 9.2 and tr
On Mon, 2023-07-10 at 04:25 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > that excessively long qt package
> Off-topic, but just in case you mean qtwebengine, I was able to get
> rid of it by putting "-webengine" in my USE flags.
I got rid of it by switching to a flatpak version o
On Monday, 19 November 2018 23:40:04 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 09:27:30 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Would someone kindly enloghten me as to why the presence of qtwebengine
> > now requires installation of www-client/falkon?
--->8
> It doesn
Hello list,
I would like to tag or be able to prioritise (not via "nice" or
"renice") large packages.
Currently, one system is compiling package 245 of 279 and nothing else.
"qlop --running --verbose --time" shows me, that it is "qtwebengine",
whic
ntium laptop with 4G RAM, which even with MAKEOPTS="-j1" takes forever to
> build qtwebengine:
>
> genlop -t dev-qt/qtwebengine
>
> Fri Feb 4 20:06:46 2022 >>> dev-qt/qtwebengine-5.15.2_p20211216
>merge time: 1 day, 3 hours, 12 minutes and 7 second
n set that in package.env too, I do this for Chromium:
% cat /etc/portage/package.env/chromium
www-client/chromium alert-done.conf disk-tmpdir.conf j2.conf
% cat /etc/portage/env/j2.conf
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
> > On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:19:24 +0300, Alexey Eschenko wrote:
> > For
quot;qlop --running --verbose --time" shows me, that it is "qtwebengine", which
> will compile for a few hours, blocking all other packages.
> […]
> Is there any way to tell "portage", that packages like "qtwebengine",
> "(ungoogled-)chromium"
lled thereafter on slower systems.
I have found older PCs with limited resources eventually reach an EOL as far
as their capability to emerge large packages. I have a very old Core 2 Duo
Pentium laptop with 4G RAM, which even with MAKEOPTS="-j1" takes forever to
build qtweben
On 14/08/2021 22:20, Ramon Fischer wrote:
Is there any way to tell "portage", that packages like "qtwebengine",
"(ungoogled-)chromium", "firefox" and so on are always compiled as last
package?
The simplest way is to exclude those packages in the f
to work well, except for a 20s period at the beginning of
> emerging qtwebengine, during which CPU load goes to 100%, according to
> gkrellm.
>
> It seems that the ebuild runs a process other than make, ignoring make.conf.
> Does anyone here know what that might be, and why it disregard
On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 18:20:54 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I had trouble with qtwebengine. It seemed to be an issue with icu-60.*
> but I wasn't prepared to downgrade to icu-59.* just as a test (icu
> changes here tend to trigger a rebuild of half of world), and a recent
> bug on
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 09:27:30 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Would someone kindly enloghten me as to why the presence of qtwebengine
> now requires installation of www-client/falkon?
>
> $ cat $(equery w kdecore-meta)
> # Copyright 1999-2018 Gentoo Authors
> # Distributed unde
Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2019, at 14:19, Walter Dnes wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 05:15:41PM +0300, Alexey Eschenko wrote
>>> Thank you. Didn't think about that. Don't know why though. My
>>> MAKEOPTS was "-j32". Looks like tha
;
>On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:19:24 +0300, Alexey Eschenko wrote:
>
>
>For some time I have problems with dev-qt/qtwebengine (at least 5.12.3)
> build. As far as I can see it fails to build due to memory exhaustion.
> Although I have 32 GB of RAM (at least 20 of them is almost
ing gcc that I didn’t get it to build, but when
running `locate libwebp.a`, I found out that I had an old version of the
lib installed in /usr/local. I can’t remember what I needed it for and so
I uninstalled it.
And whaddaya know, qtwebengine now compiles happily. I’m already at file
8981/15
;--jobs --load-average=4 [...] "
> > MAKEOPTS="-j4 -l4"
> >
> > That seems to work well, except for a 20s period at the beginning of
> > emerging qtwebengine, during which CPU load goes to 100%, according to
> > gkrellm.
> >
> > It seems that the ebui
; > raffaele
> >
> >
>
>
> I'm having trouble with these:
>
> net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.4.11-r200
> dev-qt/qtwebengine-5.9.3
> net-libs/webkit-gtk
>
> Those three, I've had to adjust the USE flags and it may or may not be
> profile switch related
Hi folks,
it’s been a while since I had a problem for which I needed a nudge. :)
Due to some other lib upgrade, I need to rebuild qtwebengine.
But it always fails with:
| In file included from
../../3rdparty/chromium/third_party/skia/src/images/SkWebpEncoder.cpp:42:
| /usreincnude/webp/mux.h
Hello,
Am Donnerstag, 21. November 2019, 19:40:43 CET schrieb Mick:
> On Thursday, 21 November 2019 17:35:30 GMT Raphael MD wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to update KDE, but the emerge is stopping at qtwebengine-5.12.5
> > compile process.
>
> I don&
Chromium and qtwebengine have the longest build times that I have
encountered
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 at 1:01 AM, Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> After my long time away from Gentoo, I thought perhaps some packages that
> always took ages to compile would have improved. I needed
to now I can say that the
> > switch to 17.0 is a _lot_ less painful than switching major
> compiler version.
> >
> > raffaele
> >
> >
>
>
> I'm having trouble with these:
>
> net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.4.11-r200
&g
On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 15:26:14 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday, 19 November 2018 23:40:04 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 09:27:30 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > Would someone kindly enloghten me as to why the presence of qtwebengine
t; How stable is it? Does it
> really "privatise" chromium? Does it allow extensions like ublock-origin?
>
> I'm happy with firefox, but it never hurts to have a choice.
I'd be also interested to know if Falkon/QtWebEngine is more or less /un-
Googled/ than the ungoogled-c
qtwebengine! yes that one took forever also. It also said my 16G of RAM was
smaller than the 16G it needed. Weird.
Anyways I enabled a swapfile and left it to run overnight
Alan
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 9:31 PM Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> After my long time away from
t;
> > > # grep '\-j' /etc/portage/make.conf
> > > EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--jobs --load-average=4 [...] "
> > > MAKEOPTS="-j4 -l4"
> > >
> > > That seems to work well, except for a 20s period at the beginning of
> > > emerging qtwebe
Mick 3:41 PM
(...)
>I don't know if your error is related to the gcc version you're using.
Better
>switch to 9.2 and try again.
I've updated GCC to 9.2 and this has solved my problem.
Thanks!
to now I can say that the
> > switch to 17.0 is a _lot_ less painful than switching major
> compiler version.
> >
> > raffaele
> >
> >
>
>
> I'm having trouble with these:
>
> net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.4.11-r200
&g
> > Would someone kindly enloghten me as to why the presence of
> > > > qtwebengine
> > > > now requires installation of www-client/falkon?
> >
> > --->8
> >
> > > It doesn't, it's the kdecore-meta package that depends on it, control
it? Does it
> > really "privatise" chromium? Does it allow extensions like ublock-origin?
> >
> > I'm happy with firefox, but it never hurts to have a choice.
>
> I'd be also interested to know if Falkon/QtWebEngine is more or less /un-
> Googled/ tha
se dev overhead.
CURRENT SITUATION:
--
If you use *-bin packages, you cannot rice, and must compile on your own.
THE APPROACH:
-
1. Some nerd (or a group of nerds) makes (or make) a package, maybe call it
`almostfreelunch.ebuild`.
2. Say you want to compile qtweb
Hi.For some time I have problems with dev-qt/qtwebengine (at least 5.12.3) build. As far as I can see it fails to build due to memory exhaustion. Although I have 32 GB of RAM (at least 20 of them is almost always free) looks like it's not enough. It's strange because I have no pro
Alexey,
you can check /etc/portage/make.conf and see if there is a
MAKEOPTS="-j8" or similar variable. If not, add it and make the number
of jobs small, like "-j2". I have a similar problem when I build
sys-devel/binutils; it is a huge memory hog.
- Matthew
Alexey Eschenko writes:
> Hi.
>
> For some time I have problems with dev-qt/qtwebengine (at least 5.12.3)
> build. As far as I can see it fails to build due to memory exhaustion.
> Although I have 32 GB of RAM (at least 20 of them is almost always free)
> looks like it&
ireball / # cat /etc/portage/package.env/package.env
> #www-client/seamonkey ../env/single.conf
> #www-client/firefox ../env/single.conf
> #www-client/firefox ../env/notmpfs.conf
> #www-client/seamonkey ../env/notmpfs.conf
> app-office/libreoffice ../env/notmpfs.conf
> #sys-de
ich I've
attached
dev-qt/qtwebengine-5.9.3
>
This needs a tiny change, I've attached my ebuild
net-libs/webkit-gtk
>
which version? Version 2.18.3 installed just fine here.
Helmut
Thank you Helmut!
It's the first time when I encountered a problem like this on my
system and now I'm thinking how to deal with it. Has anyone dealt with
this? Is there any solutions other than buying more RAM (I don't need
more RAM for my work/entertainment right now)?
Thanks in advance.
You can use more swap
On 08/07/2023 11:33, Dale wrote:
that excessively long qt package
Off-topic, but just in case you mean qtwebengine, I was able to get rid
of it by putting "-webengine" in my USE flags. After a world update, a
depclean should then remove it from the system.
You might have to ju
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 08:53:26AM +0100, Mick wrote:
> On Sunday, 28 April 2019 21:25:58 BST Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > it’s been a while since I had a problem for which I needed a nudge. :)
> > Due to some other lib upgrade, I need to rebuild q
-client/firefox ../env/single.conf
#www-client/firefox ../env/notmpfs.conf
#www-client/seamonkey ../env/notmpfs.conf
app-office/libreoffice ../env/notmpfs.conf
#sys-devel/gcc ../env/notmpfs.conf
dev-qt/qtwebengine ../env/notmpfs.conf
#dev-qt/qtwebkit ../env/notmpfs.conf
#sci-electronics/kicad ../en
that for package/ Looks like this:
>>
>>
>> root@fireball / # cat /etc/portage/package.env/package.env
>> #www-client/seamonkey ../env/single.conf
>> #www-client/firefox ../env/single.conf
>> #www-client/firefox ../env/notmpfs.conf
>> #www-client/seamonkey
bose @world
-Ramon
On 15/08/2021 17:48, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 14/08/2021 22:20, Ramon Fischer wrote:
Is there any way to tell "portage", that packages like "qtwebengine",
"(ungoogled-)chromium", "firefox" and so on are always compiled as
last packag
/portage/package.env/no_tmpfs.conf")
>[...]
>/usr/bin/emerge --ask --update --deep --newuse --tree --verbose
>--exclude="${large_package_list//$'\n'/ }" @world
>/usr/bin/emerge --ask --update --deep --newuse --tree --verbose @world
>
>-Ramon
>
>O
webchannel-5.9.2 [5.7.1]
[ebuild R ] net-analyzer/wireshark-2.4.2
[ebuild U ] xfce-base/xfwm4-4.13.0-r1 [4.12.3-r1] USE="opengl%*
-xpresent%"
[ebuild U ] app-editors/vim-8.0.1188 [8.0.0386] USE="terminal%*"
PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_4%* -python2_7% -pytho
>
> I can't really help with the problem, but I've built the same package
> recently with just 4GB of RAM. (It takes a long time.) So most likely
> it's something in your portage settings that's causing this.
>
> - Lasse
Agreed. I’ve built it recently on 16GB of RAM. My MAKEOPTS is -j13 -l5 to
>
> You can use more swap (files) before buying more RAM.
>
>
I have been doing this too. It only get used during the big builds.
To create a 32G swap file and enable it (OP can do this now as the build
runs, to keep OOM away)
# fallocate -l 32G && chmod 600 && mkswap
&& swapon
use 'watch fre
Hello list,
Would someone kindly enloghten me as to why the presence of qtwebengine now
requires installation of www-client/falkon?
$ cat $(equery w kdecore-meta)
# Copyright 1999-2018 Gentoo Authors
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
EAPI=6
inherit kde5-meta
>
> More swap will help, but the basic problem here is the HUGE number of jobs
> specified. If each job eats say up to 2G when it gets going, then -j32
> will
> require >64G RAM to keep running without thrashing the swap device, or
> running
> OOM.
>
Yes agree. If the swapfile is on an SSD then t
On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 21:20:23 +0200, Ramon Fischer wrote:
> Is there any way to tell "portage", that packages like "qtwebengine",
> "(ungoogled-)chromium", "firefox" and so on are always compiled as last
> package?
You can use the --exclude o
On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 01:18:02 -0600, Dale wrote:
> I'm having trouble with these:
>
> net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.4.11-r200
> dev-qt/qtwebengine-5.9.3
> net-libs/webkit-gtk
>
> Those three, I've had to adjust the USE flags and it may or may not be
> profile switch re
PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_7"
>
>
I would remove those entries and try again. As a Gnome ~amd64 user,
python
2.7 was depcleaned on the 11th as the last dependency was removed.
I don't think that's quite fully true - as it's still a build time
dependency
t; THE APPROACH:
> -
> 1. Some nerd (or a group of nerds) makes (or make) a package, maybe call it
>`almostfreelunch.ebuild`.
>
> 2. Say you want to compile qtwebengine. You do: `almostfreelunch -aqvDuNt
>--backbrack=1000 qtwebengine`.
>
> 3. The app, `almos
On Sunday, 28 April 2019 21:25:58 BST Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> it’s been a while since I had a problem for which I needed a nudge. :)
> Due to some other lib upgrade, I need to rebuild qtwebengine.
>
> But it always fails with:
> | In file included fr
lient/seamonkey
app-office/libreoffice
sys-devel/gcc
dev-qt/qtwebengine
dev-qt/qtwebkit
I'm on 16GB as well, with a 9GB /var/tmp/portage tmpfs, and all of the
above build fine. No need to build them on disk.
Note that tmpfs does not consume any memory if there's no files in it!
So you can
Howdy,
I have a chroot environment that I do updates in. Once the updates are
done, I copy the binaries and distfiles over to my running system and
use the -k option to update everything in my real system. It comes in
real handy when libreoffice, Firefox, qtwebengine and other large time
but why didn't --load-average=32 take precedence?
--->8
> Some packages that I build with either a greatly reduced -j setting or
> a non-tmpfs build directory are:
> sys-cluster/ceph
> dev-python/scipy
> dev-python/pandas
> app-office/calligra
> net-libs/nodejs
> d
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 08/07/2023 11:33, Dale wrote:
>> that excessively long qt package
> Off-topic, but just in case you mean qtwebengine, I was able to get
> rid of it by putting "-webengine" in my USE flags. After a world
> update, a depclean should th
::gentoo USE="qml
-debug -test" 198 KiB
[ebuild N ] dev-qt/qtpositioning-5.14.1:5/5.14::gentoo USE="qml
-debug -geoclue -test" 5,976 KiB
[ebuild N ] dev-qt/qtscript-5.14.1:5/5.14::gentoo USE="jit -debug
-scripttools -test" 2,593 KiB
[ebuild N ] dev-qt
g to install just zoom and its deps without the --nodeps flag for
each package - working so far but I cant tell until qtwebengine finishes
compiling ... hopefully before Easter :)
I am hoping that mesa will supply the files and libglvnd is not needed
and the ebuild just needs fixing.
I thought
and its deps without the --nodeps flag for
> each package - working so far but I cant tell until qtwebengine finishes
> compiling ... hopefully before Easter :)
>
> I am hoping that mesa will supply the files and libglvnd is not needed
> and the ebuild just needs fixing.
>
> I
ime.
>
>
> What other packages have huge build times?
>
> --
> Alan McKinnon
> alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
I have some software you don't likely use that takes a while but one
that is common is qtwebengine or something. If it's not that one, it's
qtweb somet
ok
> a while, but I didn't record time.
Chromium is definitely the worst, and strangely variable. The last few
compiles have taken between 6 and 14 hours. Since it takes longer than
everything else to build, it is usually compiling on its own, so parallel
emerges aren't a factor.
Qtweben
nt/scratch/tmp/portage/app-office/libreoffice-6.4.7.2/work/
libreoffic
e-6.4.7.2/workdir/CustomTarget/sysui/share/libreoffice/create_tree.sh
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
--->8
There's also qtwebengine to get through when I have this one fixed.
--
Regards,
Peter.
7;t record time.
What's your CPU and how much RAM? Even on my older system I had (an
4-core i5 2500K) libreoffice took like 2 hours or so to build.
What other packages have huge build times?
IIRC, dev-qt/qtwebengine is one of the heaviest when it comes to build
times.
Anyway, a nice way
RAM-hungry.
Right now my list includes:
calligra
qtwebengine
qtwebkit
ceph
nodejs
passwdqc
scipy
pandas
spidermonkey
(It has been ages since I've pruned the list, and of course what is
"too much RAM" will vary.)
The other thing I will tweak is avoiding building in a tmpfs.
Obvious
es that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [ebuild N ] media-libs/libglvnd-1.3.1::gentoo USE="X -test"
> ABI_X86="(64) -32 (-x32)" 0 KiB
> [ebuild N ] dev-qt/qtwebchannel-5.14.1:5/5.14::gentoo USE="qml
&g
/bin/emerge --ask --update --deep --newuse --tree --verbose
--exclude="${large_package_list//$'\n'/ }" @world
/usr/bin/emerge --ask --update --deep --newuse --tree --verbose @world
-Ramon
On 15/08/2021 17:48, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 14/08/2021 22:20, Ramon Fischer
to Chromium. But otherwise webkitgtk and qtwebengine are to
big ones - but still about a quarter of Chromium.
Kristian Poul Herkild
Den 11.09.2023 kl. 21.19 skrev Alan McKinnon:
After my long time away from Gentoo, I thought perhaps some packages
that always took ages to compile would have
/qtsql-5.14.2
> dev-qt/qtsvg-5.14.1
> dev-qt/qttest-5.14.2
> dev-qt/qtwayland-5.14.2
> dev-qt/qtwebchannel-5.14.2
> dev-qt/qtwebengine-5.14.2
> dev-qt/qtwebkit-5.212.0_pre20200309-r1
> dev-qt/qtwidgets-5.14.2
> dev-qt/qtx11extras-5.14.2
Most of your Qt packages have the 5.1
N ] dev-qt/qtscript-5.14.1:5/5.14::gentoo USE="jit -debug
-scripttools -test" 2,593 KiB
[ebuild N ] dev-qt/qtwebengine-5.14.1:5/5.14::gentoo USE="alsa
pulseaudio system-ffmpeg system-icu widgets -bindist -debug -designer
-geolocation -jumbo-build -test" 236,757 Ki
at least 36-to-40 gigabytes.
Well, I've seen that warning, and I run a plasma desktop, but I set -j48 --
jobs=48 --load-average=72 without noticeable swapping in this 64GB, 24-core
Ryzen 9 5900X machine. The one exception is qtwebengine, which wants 48GB
for itself.
--
Regards,
Peter.
howwever if a job is scheduled it's running, independently
of the current load.
While having it in MAKEOPTS, it would be handled by the make system,
which schedules single build jobs, and would stop scheduling additional
jobs, when the load is too high.
Extreme case:
emerge chromium firefox qtwebe
t stream of "link failure"
messages on the console window where Chrome is running.
> I don't have chrome/chromium installed here to directly compare
> notes and so far qtwebengine appears to work fine after updating
> llvm this morning, as does www-client/microsoft-edge.
U ] xfce-base/xfwm4-4.13.0-r1 [4.12.3-r1] USE="opengl%*
> -xpresent%"
> [ebuild U ] app-editors/vim-8.0.1188 [8.0.0386] USE="terminal%*"
> PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_4%* -python2_7% -python3_5% -python3_6%"
> [ebuild U ] dev-qt/qtwebengine-5.9.2 [5.
On Thursday, 13 June 2019 12:59:41 BST Adam Carter wrote:
> > You can use more swap (files) before buying more RAM.
>
> I have been doing this too. It only get used during the big builds.
>
> To create a 32G swap file and enable it (OP can do this now as the build
> runs, to keep OOM away)
> # fa
st.
root@fireball / # cat /etc/portage/package.env/package.env
#www-client/seamonkey ../env/single.conf
#www-client/firefox ../env/single.conf
#www-client/firefox ../env/notmpfs.conf
#www-client/seamonkey ../env/notmpfs.conf
app-office/libreoffice ../env/notmpfs.conf
#sys-devel/gcc ../env/notmpfs.co
, qtwebengine and other large time
consuming packages are being updated. The bad thing is, I have the full
length of build time in the chroot but the binary install on my running
system. Is there a way to either stop it from logging binary updates or
removing them after it is done? I'd rather it not
t really mind the
> webkit-gtk build time since it's shared between epiphany and evolution.
> I just run that (and/or gcc) overnight when I need to.
I have an old Acer laptop with a Core 2 Duo P7550 @2.26GHz CPU and only 4G
RAM. It will compile everything, even rust and qtwebengine,
ossible.
>
> Thoughts? Ever heard of such a thing?
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
How about first making a list of all files needing to be rebuilt with
something like
emerge -pDuNv @world > builds
Then make a file “long” containing names of demanding builds like firefox
and qtwebengine, one
ing else to build, it is usually compiling on its own, so parallel
> emerges aren't a factor.
>
> Qtwebengine is also bad, not surprising as it is a cut down Chromium.
> Emerging world with --exclude then timing build to coincide with sleep
> helps, although I haven't quit
hallenging when
> even a single gcc job could grow to 3G or more. Swapping and a disk
> I/O bottleneck becomes unavoidable and moving the compile of binaries
> to a bigger PC becomes a rather wise solution.
That's why I have Chromium, as well and LO and qtwebengine, set to use my
SSD f
ts/answer/6010255?hl=en
Then change the Kmail/Settings/Receiving/Advanced/Authentication from "Gmail"
to "Plain". The other relevant settings are "SSL/TLS" and port "993".
When selecting "Gmail" authentication, it used to be the case qtwebengine
sible to set things up so that, say, qtwebengine is never
compiled at the same time as anything else? I don't want to rely on my
noticing and intervening, and besides, it isn't always possible just to
--exclude it.
--
Regards,
Peter.
On 11/09/2023 20:46, Alan McKinnon wrote:
qtwebengine! yes that one took forever also. It also said my 16G of RAM
was smaller than the 16G it needed. Weird.
Anyways I enabled a swapfile and left it to run overnight
16GB physical ram <> 16GB usable ram for the compile ...
I concu
would kill pretty much anything
alive on a PC. With 16G RAM I had to add swap, reduce number of jobs, move /
var/tmp/portage to a disk and various other resource gymnastics to stop users
cursing at me for "doing things on their workstation and slowing it down"!
I figured since qtwebe
ut I now use
it for a few other packages too. This laptop is now happily building
Chromium and it was only this discussion that reminded me that it was
doing so :)
> I figured since qtwebengine uses the same rendering engine and I spend
> enough time compiling that package anyway, because KDE w
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
