Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in spidermonkey?

/spidermonkey-1.8.5-r1 in package.mask. If it works, good, else skip the update of spidermonkey and any dependent packages (I believe there are not many applications which depend on this). -- Nilesh Govindarajan http://nileshgr.com

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in spidermonkey?

Hi there Well I did reinstall my whole system but without luck. Emerging gnome-light showed the very same error when compiling spidermonkey. Then I thought I will install awesome, because it does not need spidermonkey. But the same problem here when compiling awesome. `Illegal statement

[gentoo-user] Re: Bug in spidermonkey?

On 02/07/2013 09:19 AM, Elias Diem wrote: Hello all I'm encountering a bug when emerging spidermonkey. The output from build.log is attached. This is from your build.log: ./system-headers | /usr/bin/perl ./make-system-wrappers.pl system_wrappers_js ./host_jskwgen /var/tmp/portage/dev

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in spidermonkey?

On 2013-02-12, Elias Diem wrote: `Illegal statement' in the build.log. The above should read `Illegal instruction'. -- Greetings Elias

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in spidermonkey?

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Elias Diem pub.li...@webconect.ch wrote: Hello all I'm encountering a bug when emerging spidermonkey. The output from build.log is attached. If you need more info, please tell me so. Thanks. Seems like one. Try compiling an older version? -- Nilesh

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Thu, Oct 13 2011, Michael Mol wrote: I've skipped most of the thread, so forgive me if this was already done...try rebuilding libmozjs? Bumping its version up or down? oldlap ~ # equery b /usr/lib/libmozjs185.so * Searching for /usr/lib/libmozjs185.so ... dev-lang/spidermonkey-1.8.5 (/usr

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in spidermonkey?

Hi Nilesh On 2013-02-07, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: Seems like one. Try compiling an older version? I'm about to try. I will report back. -- Greetings Elias

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Bug in spidermonkey?

Hi Walt On 2013-02-07, walt wrote: Any time perl is involved in a bug I suggest running 'perl-cleaner'. May not help, but it couldn't hurt :) Unfortunately it didn't help... -- Greetings Elias

Re: [gentoo-user] My emerge @preserved-rebuild is wedged. Help, please!

to be merged, among them being > > [ebuild R] dev-lang/spidermonkey-78.15.0 [78.15.0] > > .. When I answer the "are you sure?" prompt with Yes, spidermonkey fails > to build with this error message: > >>>> Emerging (1 of 5) dev-lang/spidermonkey-78.15.0:

Re: [gentoo-user] =dev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r4 fails @world update

a macbook pro 9,1. I have successfuly updated @world with default/linux/amd64/17.1 profile. After selectimg default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop profile and emerge -uND @world, '=dev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r4::gentoo' fails. Any ideas?

Re: [gentoo-user] =dev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r4 fails @world update

op profile and emerge -uND > > @world, > > '=dev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r4::gentoo' fails. > > Any ideas? Thank you. > > > > =

[gentoo-user] OT - compiling avidemux-2.3.0 (not Gentoo specific

I'm trying to install the lastest version of avidemux, downloaded from their website. The compilation instructions said to run configure with --with-jsapi-include=location of spidermonkey and --with-newfaad for Gentoo. I keep trying, but it won't work and I don't understand why. Here's

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

for /usr/lib/libmozjs185.so ... dev-lang/spidermonkey-1.8.5 (/usr/lib/libmozjs185.so - libmozjs185.so.1.0) dev-lang/spidermonkey-1.8.5 (/usr/lib/libmozjs185.so.1.0.0) [I] dev-lang/spidermonkey Available versions: 1.7.0 (~)1.7.0-r1 (~)1.7.0-r2 1.8.2.15 {M}(~)1.8.5 {static-libs test

Re: [gentoo-user] cross-emerge dev-lang/spidermonkey fails without obvious error

Le 07/12/20 à 09:14, Britaliope a tapoté : > Do you see anything that would help me to identify what caused this > failure ? The original error (with cut parts) : >Compiling mozglue-static v0.1.0 > (/usr/aarch64-linux-gnu/tmp/portage/dev-lang/spidermonkey-78.5.0/work/firefox-78

Re: [gentoo-user] cross-emerge dev-lang/spidermonkey fails without obvious error

t; > failure ? > > The original error (with cut parts) : > > >Compiling mozglue-static v0.1.0 > > > (/usr/aarch64-linux-gnu/tmp/portage/dev-lang/spidermonkey-78.5.0/work/firefox-78.5.0/mozglue/static/rust) > > Running `CARGO=/usr/lib/rust/1.48.0/bin/ca

Re: [gentoo-user] My emerge @preserved-rebuild is wedged. Help, please!

recovered from /var/db/pkg. It shows me 5 packages to be merged, among them being [ebuild R] dev-lang/spidermonkey-78.15.0 [78.15.0] .. When I answer the "are you sure?" prompt with Yes, spidermonkey fails to build with this error message: Emerging (1 of 5) dev-lang/sp

[gentoo-user] My emerge @preserved-rebuild is wedged. Help, please!

Hello, Gentoo. I'm trying to do # emerge -a @preserved-rebuild .. For this purpose, I created a temporary repository, filling it with ancient ebuilds recovered from /var/db/pkg. It shows me 5 packages to be merged, among them being [ebuild R] dev-lang/spidermonkey-78.15.0

Re: [gentoo-user] =dev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r4 fails @world update

urp...@gmx.com wrote: > Greetings. I have just installed Gentoo on a macbook pro 9,1. I have > successfuly updated @world with default/linux/amd64/17.1 profile. > After selectimg default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop profile and emerge -uND > @world, > '=dev-lang/spidermonk

[gentoo-user] =dev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r4 fails @world update

Greetings. I have just installed Gentoo on a macbook pro 9,1. I have successfuly updated @world with default/linux/amd64/17.1 profile. After selectimg default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop profile and emerge -uND @world, '=dev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r4::gentoo' fails. Any ideas? Thank

Re: [gentoo-user] Python 2.7 removal : problem with Firefox + Spidermonkey

[2020-07-29 13:11] Philip Webb Hi, > I've removed every other pkg which might require Python-2.7, > but am stuck with this : > > root:605 ~> emerge -cpv python:2.7 > > Calculating dependencies... done! > dev-lang/python-2.7.18-r1 pulled in by: > dev-lan

Re: [gentoo-user] My emerge @preserved-rebuild is wedged. Help, please!

R] dev-lang/spidermonkey-78.15.0 [78.15.0] .. When I answer the "are you sure?" prompt with Yes, spidermonkey fails to build with this error message: Emerging (1 of 5) dev-lang/spidermonkey-78.15.0::localrepo !!! Fetched file: firefox-78.15.0esr.source.tar.xz VERIFY FAILED!

Re: [gentoo-user] My emerge @preserved-rebuild is wedged. Help, please!

merged, among them being > > [ebuild R] dev-lang/spidermonkey-78.15.0 [78.15.0] > > .. When I answer the "are you sure?" prompt with Yes, spidermonkey fails > > to build with this error message: > >>>> Emerging (1 of 5) dev-lang/spidermo

RE: [gentoo-user] =dev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r4 fails @world update

oo-user] =dev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r4 fails @world update On Saturday, 20 June 2020 00:07:45 BST urp...@gmx.com wrote: > I haven't thought about these things in a long time. I've never had more > than 4GB of RAM. Welcome to the world of compiling everything from source. -- Regards, Peter.

[gentoo-user] Python 2.7 removal : problem with Firefox + Spidermonkey

I've removed every other pkg which might require Python-2.7, but am stuck with this : root:605 ~> emerge -cpv python:2.7 Calculating dependencies... done! dev-lang/python-2.7.18-r1 pulled in by: dev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r4 requires >=dev-lang/python-2.7.5-r2:2.7[ncurses,

Re: [gentoo-user] Python 2.7 removal : problem with Firefox + Spidermonkey

29.07.2020 20:11, Philip Webb пишет: > I've removed every other pkg which might require Python-2.7, > but am stuck with this : > > root:605 ~> emerge -cpv python:2.7 > > Calculating dependencies... done! > dev-lang/python-2.7.18-r1 pulled in by: > dev-lan

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

 * Searching for /usr/lib/libmozjs185.so ... dev-lang/spidermonkey-1.8.5 (/usr/lib/libmozjs185.so - libmozjs185.so.1.0) dev-lang/spidermonkey-1.8.5 (/usr/lib/libmozjs185.so.1.0.0) [I] dev-lang/spidermonkey     Available versions:  1.7.0 (~)1.7.0-r1 (~)1.7.0-r2 1.8.2.15 {M}(~)1.8.5 {static-libs

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in spidermonkey?

On 2013-02-07, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: Seems like one. Try compiling an older version? Actually I can compile version 1.7.0 But: When I want to update world, it needs (I think) version 1.8.5-r1 -- Greetings Elias

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in spidermonkey? SOLVED!!

Hello there Just for the record: I was able to solve the problem!! I created a separate environment file in /etc/portage/env. The content of this file is: -8--- CFLAGS=-pipe CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS} MAKEOPTS=-j1 -8--- The CFLAGS normally

Re: [gentoo-user] Python 2.7 removal : problem with Firefox + Spidermonkey

Hello, On Sat, 01 Aug 2020, Walter Dnes wrote: [..] > So a "palemoon-bin" ebuild is possible. There's already one in the palemoon overlay. -dnh -- "If Pacman had affected us as kids we'd be running around in dark rooms, munching pills and listening to repetitive music." -- Marcus

Re: [gentoo-user] =dev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r4 fails @world update

Sean O'Myers wrote: > > How do I unscripted > >   > > Sent from Mail for > Windows 10 > > Send a email to this address. List-Unsubscribe: Dale :-) :-)

Re: [gentoo-user] =dev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r4 fails @world update

On Saturday, 20 June 2020 00:07:45 BST urp...@gmx.com wrote: > I haven't thought about these things in a long time. I've never had more > than 4GB of RAM. Welcome to the world of compiling everything from source. -- Regards, Peter.

Re: [gentoo-user] My emerge @preserved-rebuild is wedged. Help, please!

packages to be merged, among them being > > [ebuild R] dev-lang/spidermonkey-78.15.0 [78.15.0] > > .. When I answer the "are you sure?" prompt with Yes, spidermonkey > > fails > > to build with this error message: > >>>> Emerging (1 of 5) dev-lan

Re: [gentoo-user] Python 2.7 removal : problem with Firefox + Spidermonkey

/python-2.7.18-r1 pulled in by: >> dev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r4 requires >> >=dev-lang/python-2.7.5-r2:2.7[ncurses,sqlite,ssl,threads] >> www-client/firefox-68.10.0 requires >> dev-lang/python:2.7[ncurses,sqlite,ssl,threads(+)] >> > For firefox,

Re: [gentoo-user] Python 2.7 removal : problem with Firefox + Spidermonkey

On 8/1/20 7:04 PM, David Haller wrote: Hello, On Sat, 01 Aug 2020, Walter Dnes wrote: [..] So a "palemoon-bin" ebuild is possible. There's already one in the palemoon overlay. -dnh This is what you are referring to? www-client/palemoon-bin [2] Available versions: 28.11.0^ms

Re: [gentoo-user] =dev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r4 fails @world update

On Friday, 19 June 2020 17:10:54 BST urp...@gmx.com wrote: > I was thinking about -j1. I tried -j4. I thought I didn't need swap with > >=4GB of RAM, but it makes sense. My machine kinda crawls trying to build > that package. Oh man, I'll have to re-partition:-( Gparted is good, run from a

Re: [gentoo-user] new installation - ERROR: dev-lang/rust-1.47.0-r2::gentoo failed (compile phase)

-bootstrap"? > Rust is a computer language, some software written in Rust need a Rust > compiler. > As I known, firefox is one. Also, here, spidermonkey, cbindgen and librsvg. -- Regards, Peter.

[gentoo-user] getting increasingly worried about this.

I'm now running my update script daily (on a SSD...) KDE is still profoundly broken. Steam still doesn't work. -- might be fixed by a reboot but can't reboot due to dependence on kde packages... Today I get [ebuild   R    ] dev-lang/spidermonkey-52.9.1_pre1:52::gentoo  USE="custom-cflags s

Re: [gentoo-user] Python 2.7 removal : problem with Firefox + Spidermonkey

ang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r4 requires >=dev-lang/python-2.7.5-r2:2.7[ncurses,sqlite,ssl,threads] www-client/firefox-68.10.0 requires dev-lang/python:2.7[ncurses,sqlite,ssl,threads(+)] Yes, I've looked in package.use & in the ebuilds & can't find any source of these requirement

Re: [gentoo-user] getting increasingly worried about this.

Hello, So from what i understand from your burbling you run a ~testing arch and the last update of spidermonkey removed jit that is used by kde. First of all, there's nothing like "Stable Enough" testing branch. It's fairly stable like won't kill your cat but sometimes things break tha

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

~ # dmesg | grep gnome-shell gnome-shell[3479] general protection ip:b682bdc2 sp:bf882764 error:0 in libmozjs185.so.1.0.0[b67f1000+2ca000] Mmmh. Then the problem is probably not the video. Try reemerging spidermonkey, gjs and gnome-shell; my versions are: [ebuild   R   #] dev-lang/spidermonkey

[gentoo-user] text browser with frames and javascript that actually works

elinks: looks nice, but comes back with javascript disabled when I try and access a javascript enabled subpage. Ive installed spidermonkey which it apparently needs with no luck. I have come across comments that a patched version of elinks is needed as well. At this rate I'll have to set up vnc so I

Re: [gentoo-user] OT - compiling avidemux-2.3.0 (not Gentoo specific

of spidermonkey configure: WARNING: Then use --with-jsapi-include=/path/to/jsapi.h/ So why isn't it taking? Am I not using it correctly? Did you try --with-jsapi-include=/usr/include/js/jsapi.h ? R Yes. With the same results. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox and kernel panics.

attempt to configure it killed FF. This is on gnome, not KDE so while symptoms differ, it may still be the same root cause - some of the underlying packages needed rebuilding - it was (maybe) nss and dev-lang/spidermonkey. Sorry, had a lot going on so cant be more specific - it was strace that tipped

[gentoo-user] Re: Bug in spidermonkey?

On 02/08/2013 05:53 AM, Elias Diem wrote: Hi Walt On 2013-02-07, walt wrote: Any time perl is involved in a bug I suggest running 'perl-cleaner'. May not help, but it couldn't hurt :) Unfortunately it didn't help... I just built 1.8.5-r1 on my ~amd64 machine without errors, and I

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Bug in spidermonkey?

Hi Walt On 2013-02-08, walt wrote: I just built 1.8.5-r1 on my ~amd64 machine without errors, and I have 1.8.5-r4 already installed. Can you unmask and compile r4 just as a test? I tried the r4 version but it failed the same way. BTW, in your build log I see waiting for unfinished jobs,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: problem dropping Python 2.7

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 01:24:48AM -0400, Philip Webb wrote > 190912 Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > > At least spidermonkey aka mozjs is required by polkit and only builds > > with python-2.7, thanks to their own !"§$% home-grown build system. > > Mozilla are working on

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: problem dropping Python 2.7

190912 Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > At least spidermonkey aka mozjs is required by polkit and only builds > with python-2.7, thanks to their own !"§$% home-grown build system. > Mozilla are working on it and it should be fixed "by the end of the year". What about Firefo

Re: [gentoo-user] Python 2.7 removal : problem with Firefox + Spidermonkey

Hello, On Sat, 01 Aug 2020, james wrote: >On 8/1/20 7:04 PM, David Haller wrote: >> On Sat, 01 Aug 2020, Walter Dnes wrote: >> [..] >> > So a "palemoon-bin" ebuild is possible. >> >> There's already one in the palemoon overlay. > >This is what you are referring to? > >www-client/palemoon-bin

Re: [gentoo-user] =dev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r4 fails @world update

Jack wrote: > Not far enough back.  You need to show the actual error, not the line > "Error1:" which gets printed after the error. > And depending on the number of cores/threads and other emerge settings, it can be a dozen, two dozen lines or sometimes even further back than that.  With CPUs

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: dns/bind-tools 9.14 -> 9.16 pulling in 17 new dependencies?!

- this time it's dev-lang/spidermonkey. :/ > > Sheesh. > You can get rid of a few of those with sys-auth/elogind -policykit sys-auth/pambase elogind in package.use, if you don't need whatever it is that policykit does.

Re: [gentoo-user] Q: What is "python-exec2c"? Why would "python3" dispatched through it not see an installed copy of pyyaml?

found on your system. * GNU info directory index is up-to-date. !!! existing preserved libs: >>> package: dev-libs/icu-68.2 * - /usr/lib64/libicudata.so.67 * - /usr/lib64/libicudata.so.67.1 * - /usr/lib64/libicui18n.so.67 * - /usr/lib64/libicui18n.so.67.1

[gentoo-user] Bug in spidermonkey?

Hello all I'm encountering a bug when emerging spidermonkey. The output from build.log is attached. If you need more info, please tell me so. Thanks. -- Greetings Elias  * Package:dev-lang/spidermonkey-1.8.5-r1  * Repository: gentoo 

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

sp:bf882764 error:0 in libmozjs185.so.1.0.0[b67f1000+2ca000] Mmmh. Then the problem is probably not the video. Try reemerging spidermonkey, gjs and gnome-shell; my versions are: [ebuild R #] dev-lang/spidermonkey-1.8.5 USE=-static-libs -test 0 kB [0] [ebuild R #] dev-libs/gjs

[gentoo-user] Chromium....

packages have failed to build, install, or execute  * postinst:  *  *  (dev-lang/spidermonkey-52.9.1_pre1-r1:52/52::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge), Log file:  *   '/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/spidermonkey-52.9.1_pre1-r1/temp/build.log'  *  (media-gfx/blender-2.79b-r1:0/0::gentoo, ebuild

Re: [gentoo-user] =dev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r4 fails @world update

u need more detail. > > I was thinking about -j1. I tried -j4. I thought I didn't need swap with > >=4GB of RAM, but it makes sense. My machine kinda crawls trying to build > that package. Oh man, I'll have to re-partition:-( A single compile job on a big package can eat >3G of

Re: [gentoo-user] =dev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r4 fails @world update

> > that package. Oh man, I'll have to re-partition:-( > > A single compile job on a big package can eat >3G of RAM. I don't know what > spidermonkey jobs may grow up to, but drop it down to '-j1' and see what you > get. > > A swapfile which you enable on a per ebuild bas

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox and kernel panics.

one restart where I got a window, any attempt to configure it killed FF. This is on gnome, not KDE so while symptoms differ, it may still be the same root cause - some of the underlying packages needed rebuilding - it was (maybe) nss and dev-lang/spidermonkey. Sorry, had a lot going on so cant

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Thu, Oct 13 2011, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: hmm, for sure your problem is not video-related then. gjs is the javascript-bindings for gnome... You could try keeping spidermonkey at 1.8.5 and (re-)build the latest version of gjs. google-ing your problem clearly shows: you

Re: [gentoo-user] xfce - folder icons gone

/glib-2.32.4-r1 [ebuild R ] x11-libs/gtk+-2.24.12 [ebuild R ] net-libs/libsoup-2.38.1 [ebuild R ] x11-libs/gtk+-3.4.4 [ebuild U ] x11-libs/vte-0.28.2-r204 [0.28.2-r203] [ebuild N] dev-lang/spidermonkey-1.8.5-r1 [ebuild U ] sys-auth/polkit-0.107-r1 [0.104-r1

[gentoo-user] Re: problem dropping Python 2.7

for a useful desktop machine because important packages like Mesa probably depend on something that in turn uses Python 2.7. For a minimal system without X11 though you can probably do it. Even on headless systems it's not completely possible at the moment. At least spidermonkey aka mozjs

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: problem dropping Python 2.7

m pkgs. I'm now left with 5 problem pkgs : llvm-7.1.0 fetchmail-6.3.26-r4 qtwebkit-5.212.0_pre20180120 spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r2 firefox-60.8.0 the former 3 all have in their ebuilds PYTHON_COMPAT=( python2_7 ) the latter 2 are said to require python 2.7 : 2.7 [ncurses sqlit

[gentoo-user] Re: problem dropping Python 2.7

On 12/09/2019 10:56, Philip Webb wrote: I'm now left with 5 problem pkgs : llvm-7.1.0 fetchmail-6.3.26-r4 qtwebkit-5.212.0_pre20180120 spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r2 firefox-60.8.0 the former 3 all have in their ebuilds PYTHON_COMPAT=( python2_7 ) the latter 2 are said to require

Re: [gentoo-user] python variables

ome gnome stuff which depends on dev-libs/gjs, which depends on dev-lang/spidermonkey:68 which depends on python:2.7.

Re: [gentoo-user] =dev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r4 fails @world update

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 09:45:59AM -0500, Dale wrote: > Jack wrote: > > Not far enough back.  You need to show the actual error, not the line > > "Error1:" which gets printed after the error. > > > > And depending on the number of cores/threads and other emerge settings, > it can be a dozen, two

[gentoo-user] Re: dns/bind-tools 9.14 -> 9.16 pulling in 17 new dependencies?!

urse every self-respecting package needs to install at least one new programming language -- this time it's dev-lang/spidermonkey. :/ Sheesh. -- Grant

Re: [gentoo-user] cross-emerge dev-lang/spidermonkey fails without obvious error

On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 17:37:00 -0600, Dale wrote: > >> Back when CPUs were single core, the error messages were fairly > >> close to the bottom.  After all, it was running one or two pieces of > >> code at a time.  With newer multi-core/threaded CPUs, that message > >> gets further back the more

Re: [gentoo-user] cross-emerge dev-lang/spidermonkey fails without obvious error

Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 17:37:00 -0600, Dale wrote: > Back when CPUs were single core, the error messages were fairly close to the bottom.  After all, it was running one or two pieces of code at a time.  With newer multi-core/threaded CPUs, that message gets

Re: [gentoo-user] cross-emerge dev-lang/spidermonkey fails without obvious error

Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:48:00 -0600, Dale wrote: > >>> Thank you very much ! >>> I really did not expect the error to appear so far up in the build.log >> Back when CPUs were single core, the error messages were fairly close to >> the bottom.  After all, it was running one or

Re: [gentoo-user] cross-emerge dev-lang/spidermonkey fails without obvious error

On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:48:00 -0600, Dale wrote: > > Thank you very much ! > > I really did not expect the error to appear so far up in the build.log > > Back when CPUs were single core, the error messages were fairly close to > the bottom.  After all, it was running one or two pieces of code at a

Re: [gentoo-user] Controlling emerges

y. Right now my list includes: calligra qtwebengine qtwebkit ceph nodejs passwdqc scipy pandas spidermonkey (It has been ages since I've pruned the list, and of course what is "too much RAM" will vary.) The other thing I will tweak is avoiding building in a tmpfs. Obviously anything tha

Re: [gentoo-user] Jobs and load-average

bengine > dev-qt/qtwebkit > dev-lang/spidermonkey > www-client/chromium > app-office/libreoffice > sys-devel/llvm > dev-lang/rust (I use the rust binary these days as this has gotten > really out of hand) > x11-libs/gtk+ Thanks for the list, Rich. -- Regards, Peter.

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

.1.0.0[b68f8000+2ca000] gnome-shell[24579] general protection ip:b68f1dc2 sp:bf8c52d4 error:0 in libmozjs185.so.1.0.0[b68b7000+2ca000] oldlap ~ # Mmmh. Then the problem is probably not the video. Try reemerging spidermonkey, gjs and gnome-shell; my versions are: [ebuild R #] dev-lang

[gentoo-user] problem dropping Python 2.7

ev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r2 requires >=dev-lang/python-2.7.5-r2:2.7[ncurses,sqlite,ssl,threads] dev-lang/yasm-1.3.0 requires >=dev-lang/python-2.7.5-r2:2.7 dev-libs/libxml2-2.9.9-r1 requires >=dev-lang/python-2.7.5-r2:2.7[xml] dev-libs/libxslt-1.1.33-r1 requires >=dev-lang/

[gentoo-user] Re: [SOLVED] =dev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r4 fails @world update

ried -j4. I thought I didn't need swap with > > > >=4GB of RAM, but it makes sense. My machine kinda crawls trying to build > > > that package. Oh man, I'll have to re-partition:-( > > > > A single compile job on a big package can eat >3G of RAM. I don't know what

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox and kernel panics.

restart where I got a window, any attempt to configure it killed FF. This is on gnome, not KDE so while symptoms differ, it may still be the same root cause - some of the underlying packages needed rebuilding - it was (maybe) nss and dev-lang/spidermonkey. Sorry, had a lot going on so cant be more

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox and kernel panics.

/spidermonkey.  Sorry, had a lot going on so cant be more specific - it was strace that tipped me off (how I cant remember). BillK I'm going to try a clean directory for it here in a minute.  I'm going to back up my whole home directory for good measure. I'm not holding my breath but I'll cross my

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox and kernel panics.

and dev-lang/spidermonkey. Sorry, had a lot going on so cant be more specific - it was strace that tipped me off (how I cant remember). BillK I'm going to try a clean directory for it here in a minute. I'm going to back up my whole home directory for good measure. I'm not holding my

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

what else you could try; maybe try the gnome-shell version? I know the crash is happening in spidermonkey, but perhaps te live version of gnome-shell avoids that code path? The code for 3.2.1 cannot be *that* different from the live version. Maybe it's worth a try. Regards. -

[gentoo-user] Re: xfce - folder icons gone

-3.0.11 [0] [ebuild R ] dev-libs/glib-2.32.4-r1 [ebuild R ] x11-libs/gtk+-2.24.12 [ebuild R ] net-libs/libsoup-2.38.1 [ebuild R ] x11-libs/gtk+-3.4.4 [ebuild U ] x11-libs/vte-0.28.2-r204 [0.28.2-r203] [ebuild N] dev-lang/spidermonkey-1.8.5-r1 [ebuild U ] sys-auth/polkit-0.107

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xfce - folder icons gone

with it: [ebuild U ] virtual/libffi-3.0.11 [0] [ebuild R ] dev-libs/glib-2.32.4-r1 [ebuild R ] x11-libs/gtk+-2.24.12 [ebuild R ] net-libs/libsoup-2.38.1 [ebuild R ] x11-libs/gtk+-3.4.4 [ebuild U ] x11-libs/vte-0.28.2-r204 [0.28.2-r203] [ebuild N] dev-lang/spidermonkey-1.8.5-r1

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: xfce - folder icons gone

/gtk+-2.24.12 [ebuild R ] net-libs/libsoup-2.38.1 [ebuild R ] x11-libs/gtk+-3.4.4 [ebuild U ] x11-libs/vte-0.28.2-r204 [0.28.2-r203] [ebuild N] dev-lang/spidermonkey-1.8.5-r1 [ebuild U ] sys-auth/polkit-0.107-r1 [0.104-r1] [ebuild U ] sys-auth/consolekit-0.4.5_p20120320

Re: [gentoo-user] Seamonkey/Firefox library USE flags

really test more system-libs since then. My system is ~amd64 on Haswell i5, SELinux no-multilib profile and systemd, gcc-5.4.0-r2-hardened as compiler. [1] Fun fact: spidermonkey seems to be the one anti example: bundled in 0ad is always major versions ahead of what is on the mozilla overlay(sic!). T

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: dns/bind-tools 9.14 -> 9.16 pulling in 17 new dependencies?!

}/polkitd, so it's only 4 new "real" packages. Of > course every self-respecting package needs to install at least one new > programming language -- this time it's dev-lang/spidermonkey. :/ > > Sheesh. According to news item https://www.gentoo.org/support/news-items

[gentoo-user] Re: dns/bind-tools 9.14 -> 9.16 pulling in 17 new dependencies?!

only requires 6 new packages (two of them are >> acct-{user,group}/polkitd, so it's only 4 new "real" packages. Of >> course every self-respecting package needs to install at least one new >> programming language -- this time it's dev-lang/spidermonkey. :/ >> >> Sh

Re: [gentoo-user] Python 2.7 removal : problem with Firefox + Spidermonkey

On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 01:05:30AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote > > I have another idea. We already have firefox-bin and libreoffice-bin > ebuilds where the compiled tarball is pulled down from upstream, and > untarred. Would this work on Pale Moon? I guess it comes down to > whether or not

Re: [gentoo-user] Python 2.7 removal : problem with Firefox + Spidermonkey

On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 06:09:53PM -0400, james wrote > and it builds, robustly and without errors, but is still dependent on > python 2.7. > > > so your details do result in palemoon 28.11.0 without python 2.7 > attendances? Python 2.7 is still a build-time dependency. But rather than

Re: [gentoo-user] Python 2.7 removal : problem with Firefox + Spidermonkey

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 08:01:33PM -0400, james wrote > Me, palemoon is my fav browser and it seems to be long term stuck on > python 2.7.. Any suggests on a more secure, feature rich browser > other than palemoon would be interesting to me to at least test. Pale Moon is a Firefox fork

Re: [gentoo-user] Python 2.7 removal : problem with Firefox + Spidermonkey

On 7/31/20 9:40 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 08:01:33PM -0400, james wrote Me, palemoon is my fav browser and it seems to be long term stuck on python 2.7.. Any suggests on a more secure, feature rich browser other than palemoon would be interesting to me to at least

Re: [gentoo-user] =dev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r4 fails @world update

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 04:52:30PM +0100, Michael wrote: > On Friday, 19 June 2020 16:35:27 BST urp...@gmx.com wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 09:45:59AM -0500, Dale wrote: > > > Jack wrote: > > > > Not far enough back. You need to show the actual error, not the line > > > > "Error1:" which

Re: [gentoo-user] =dev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r4 fails @world update

On Friday, 19 June 2020 16:35:27 BST urp...@gmx.com wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 09:45:59AM -0500, Dale wrote: > > Jack wrote: > > > Not far enough back. You need to show the actual error, not the line > > > "Error1:" which gets printed after the error. > > > > And depending on the number of

Re: [gentoo-user] cross-emerge dev-lang/spidermonkey fails without obvious error

Britaliope wrote: > Thank you very much ! > I really did not expect the error to appear so far up in the build.log > > Regards > Bruno MATEU > For future reference.  If you use a terminal, like Konsole for example, that has a search function, search for error 1.  That gets you pretty close to the

Re: [gentoo-user] Rusty problems

t's a separate complaint), and spidermonkey requires rust to build, there's no avoiding it for my needs, so I just cut bait. The same can be said for GHC (the Glasgow Haskell Compiler). I can't do my day-to-day without shellcheck, but spending 8 hours to build a compiler for shellcheck (and someti

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [SOLVED] =dev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r4 fails @world update

On Saturday, 20 June 2020 04:18:24 BST urp...@gmx.com wrote: > On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 08:56:52AM +1000, urp...@gmx.com wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 06:08:49PM +0100, Michael wrote: > > > A single compile job on a big package can eat >3G of RAM. I don't know > &g

[gentoo-user] xdm login problems after recent emerge

downgraded baselayout, sysvinit and freetype but the problem remains. Any ideas? These are the packages emerged recently: Mon Dec 31 18:38:51 2007 sys-devel/gcc-config-1.4.0-r4 Mon Dec 31 18:41:08 2007 dev-lang/spidermonkey-1.7.0 Mon

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox and kernel panics.

of the underlying packages needed rebuilding - it was (maybe) nss and dev-lang/spidermonkey. Sorry, had a lot going on so cant be more specific - it was strace that tipped me off (how I cant remember). BillK I'm going to try a clean directory for it here in a minute. I'm going to back up my whole

Re: [gentoo-user] Seamonkey/Firefox library USE flags

from bundled setups — at least that was the > > state at firefox-49 and I didn’t really test more system-libs since then. > > My system is ~amd64 on Haswell i5, SELinux no-multilib profile and > > systemd, > > gcc-5.4.0-r2-hardened as compiler. > > > > [1] Fun fact:

Re: [gentoo-user] Seamonkey/Firefox library USE flags

libvpx system-sqlite“ > > and the rest needs to be used from bundled setups — at least that was the > state at firefox-49 and I didn’t really test more system-libs since then. > My system is ~amd64 on Haswell i5, SELinux no-multilib profile and systemd, > gcc-5.4.0-r2-hardened as com

[gentoo-user] Upgrading to icu-65.1 causes problems

4:0/0::gentoo, installed) dev-libs/icu:0/64.2 required by (app-office/libreoffice-bin-6.2.8.2:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) ^^^ >=dev-libs/icu-59.1:0/64.2= required by (dev-lang/spidermonkey-60.5.2_p0-r2:60/60::gentoo, ins

Re: [gentoo-user] Python 2.7 removal : problem with Firefox + Spidermonkey

On 8/1/20 12:10 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 01:05:30AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote I have another idea. We already have firefox-bin and libreoffice-bin ebuilds where the compiled tarball is pulled down from upstream, and untarred. Would this work on Pale Moon? I guess it

Re: [gentoo-user] Python 2.7 removal : problem with Firefox + Spidermonkey

On 7/31/20 9:50 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 08:01:33PM -0400, james wrote Me, palemoon is my fav browser and it seems to be long term stuck on python 2.7.. Any suggests on a more secure, feature rich browser other than palemoon would be interesting to me to at least

  1   2   >