Christopher Cowart ccowart at rescomp.berkeley.edu writes:
Sounds like this is related to the bug that's in an earlier thread.
Do as root:
# ebuild `equery which udev` digest
Generating digest file...
udev-079.tar.bz2
Generating manifest file...
ChangeLog
files/05-udev-early.rules-078
Is it safe to unmerge sys-fs/udev-171-r9
it is blocking udev-197
--
Joseph
Unmerge udev.
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
1. remove udev-postmount:
I did this but worry that I now cannot reboot until I upgrade
udev. Is that correct?
Based on my experience, you just don't care about udev-postmount.
It will automagically be removed when you upgrade from udev-171
to udev-197.
-Matt
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Sascha Cunz sascha...@babbelbox.org wrote:
[...]
But it fixes how udev it's packaged in Gentoo, which is very good
news. I haven't upgraded, since I need systemd-197 also (which
, 2012 at 01:05:34PM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote
I also did 2 {system,world}.err. system.err was empty. I've included
world.err in the enclosed tarball.
From your error listing, it looks like lvm2, kde, and gnome (including
the XFCE subset) require udev. Ouch.
:-) This cannot
in the enclosed tarball.
From your error listing, it looks like lvm2, kde, and gnome (including
the XFCE subset) require udev. Ouch.
:-) This cannot be the case. Otherwise somebody would have said. Hmm.
What we could do with is a requires xdev, for x in (m u). I've
forgotten what that's
On 2013-08-01 7:27 PM, William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Something like
olympus ~ # cat /etc/portage/package.mask
=sys-fs/udev-180
...
olympus ~ #
olympus ~ # grep udev /etc/portage/package.keywords
sys-fs/eudev ~amd64
=virtual/udev-206 ~amd64
olympus ~ #
unmerge everything udev
Hi list,
i was trying to upgrade udev from version 070-r1 to 079-r1; however
before trying to build the package it says:
emerge (1 of 1) sys-fs/udev-079-r1 to /
md5 files ;-) udev-079-r1.ebuild
md5 files ;-) udev-081.ebuild
md5 files ;-) udev-081-r1.ebuild
md5 files ;-) udev-084
On Saturday 18 February 2006 20:42, Marco Calviani wrote:
Hi list,
i was trying to upgrade udev from version 070-r1 to 079-r1; however
before trying to build the package it says:
emerge (1 of 1) sys-fs/udev-079-r1 to /
md5 files ;-) udev-079-r1.ebuild
md5 files ;-) udev-081.ebuild
James wireless at tampabay.rr.com writes:
So unless somebody can give me good reason, I'm downgrading to
udev-171 asap on this (only) system running udev 196...
(ps, I like to experiment, but not with udev et. al.)
Long night, when you have to answer your own posts.
Now I get
Mick wrote:
> I've noticed udev has been playing up lately. In particular, switching on
> wireless/bluetooth would cause udev to be pegged to 100% CPU and bluetooth
> won't work. USB won't work thereafter; e.g. unplugging a USB mouse and
> replugging it is not detected.
>
On 04/08/10 21:01, Song Zhiwei wrote:
Dear all,
I installed gentoo-sources-2.6.24-r8 for a legacy esdcan-usb331
driver. The current udev-149 does not match this kernel now. Who can
tell me which version of udev can work with linux kernel
2.6.24-gentoo-r8?
Regards,
Zhiwei
I believe udev-143
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:05:30 +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
Why on earth is udev launching daemons in EARLY BOOT?
udev launches nothing. udev scripts do. These scripts are not part of
udev.
That is true, but udev provides no control over when these scripts are
run. udev starts in early
James wireless at tampabay.rr.com writes:
looking into : /mnt/gentoo/new/usr/portage/sys-fs/udev
I cannot tell what version of udev (udev mount)
and others (udev-init-scipts ?) were installed
and how to roll this back.
OK so on one of my working systems, I have
sys-fs/udev-171-r9 installed
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 22:38:53 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Do you have sys-fs/udev in your world file by any chance? If so,
please remove it.
Yes, I had. Removed it, same blockages.
now:
# grep udev /var/lib/portage/world
app-vim/udev-syntax
virtual/udev
You still have
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:24:49 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
Why is it that when I comment out the package.mask entries for udev:
#=sys-fs/udev-181
#=virtual/udev-181
emerge -pvuND world shows updates to udev-197, with no mention of
udev-200, but...
Because you're running stable? Versions
On 1/3/2013 20:54, James wrote:
James wireless at tampabay.rr.com writes:
So unless somebody can give me good reason, I'm downgrading to
udev-171 asap on this (only) system running udev 196...
(ps, I like to experiment, but not with udev et. al.)
Long night, when you have to answer your
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Sascha Cunz sascha...@babbelbox.org wrote:
[...]
But it fixes how udev it's packaged in Gentoo, which is very good
news. I haven't upgraded, since I need systemd-197 also (which wasn't
yet in the tree yesterday), and I don't use LVM, but I'm wondering
On Nov 8, 2013 4:27 PM, Pavel Volkov negai...@gmail.com wrote:
Does sys-fs/udev-init-scripts serve any purpose on a system that:
1. Has systemd installed and openrc uninstalled
2. Has INSTALL_MASK=/etc/init.d/ set in make.conf
I'm asking because sys-fs/udev-init-scripts is a dependency
OK so lots of updates (mostly kde 4.9.3)
to several systems today. 2 or the 3 are fine
One got hosed. Error message upon reboot
config_devdmpfs=y is required in your kernel configuration
for this version of udev to run successfully
this requires immediate action
mdev: sys/class no such file
Mark Knecht ha scritto:
That appears to be a testing version of udev. Do you always run testing?
FYI, udev-103 is stable udev.
I run stable, and I have udev-103 as the last version (I still must
upgrade, however...)
m.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Am 26.03.2013 01:20, schrieb Mike Gilbert:
Please run emerge -1 /lib/udev to reinstall any packages which have
installed udev rules in /lib/udev/rules.d.
29 pkgs there (virtual/udev in there again) late here ...
more tomorrow ...
thanks, regards, Stefan
On March 13, 2012 at 4:27 PM Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
wrote:
snip
Fringe programs will not require udev, or it will be optional; but
the moment a fringe program reaches critical mass to become
maistream, the probability of it needing udev (directly or
indirectly) will increase
Should we still be using coldplug or hotplug or has udev
robustly replaced cold and hotplug?
Hotplug and coldplug are obsolete, use udev.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Because no one mentioned it. There is also a Gentoo udev Guide:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/udev-guide.xml
max
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Ok, does anyone run a udev system without hotplug and coldplug?
gandalf ~ # emerge udev -epv | egrep plug|udev
[ebuild N] sys-apps/hotplug-base-20040401 0 kB
[ebuild N] sys-fs/udev-070-r1 (-selinux) -static 0 kB
--
Mike Williams
What is the meaning of this? It looks like you
The 03/01/12, Pandu Poluan wrote:
(Come to think of it, has *any* distro ever attempted this...
'unconventional of going udev-free?)
mdev is not an udev replacement. It's a very minimalist udev designed
for embedded systems and initramfs. These days, a full-featured system
require a dynamic
Dustin C. Hatch admiralnemo at gmail.com writes:
The problem is you are trying to downgrade sys-fs/udev but not
virtual/udev. If you want to force using udev-171, you need to mask both
the real and virtual atoms. Try this in /etc/portage/package.mask/udev:
=sys-fs/udev-181
=virtual
On 03/30/2013 11:24 PM, Tanstaafl
wrote:
Ok,
I don't understand this...
Why is it that when I comment out the package.mask entries for
udev:
#=sys-fs/udev-181
#=virtual/udev-181
emerge
Hi guys,
to which udev version should be upgraded for the baselayout2?
Thanks,
justin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I assume I have to remove udev-init-scripts now?
On 2013-03-30 12:42 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:24:49 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
Why is it that when I comment out the package.mask entries for udev:
#=sys-fs/udev-181
#=virtual/udev-181
emerge -pvuND world shows updates to udev-197, with no mention
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Sascha Cunz sascha...@babbelbox.org wrote:
[...]
But it fixes how udev it's packaged in Gentoo, which
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 05/21/2012 03:27 PM, Michael Hampicke wrote:
I updated udev from 171-r5 to 171-r6 and now i get several udevd
boot message as : udevd[1389]: can not find
'/lib/udev/rules.d/90-network.rules': No such file
On 02/15/13 07:58, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 15.02.2013 03:38, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it safe to unmerge sys-fs/udev-171-r9 it is blocking udev-197
As long as you don't stop udev, nor try to reboot before merging
Am 25.03.2013 22:26, schrieb Mike Gilbert:
Do you have sys-fs/udev in your world file by any chance? If so,
please remove it.
Yes, I had. Removed it, same blockages.
now:
# grep udev /var/lib/portage/world
app-vim/udev-syntax
virtual/udev
...
Ad use-flags:
I have/had
=sys-fs/udev-197-r8
Does sys-fs/udev-init-scripts serve any purpose on a system that:
1. Has systemd installed and openrc uninstalled
2. Has INSTALL_MASK=/etc/init.d/ set in make.conf
I'm asking because sys-fs/udev-init-scripts is a dependency of sys-
apps/systemd and I can't figure out why.
I currenly added
Am 04.05.2014 03:56, schrieb Mark Pariente:
I had a similar issue after upgrading to sys-apps/systemd-212-r3. Turned
out it was due to udev rules.d directory location. I still had a bunch
of udev rules under /usr/lib64/udev/rules.d and it looks like the new
systemd/udev is only looking
Ok, I don't understand this...
Why is it that when I comment out the package.mask entries for udev:
#=sys-fs/udev-181
#=virtual/udev-181
emerge -pvuND world shows updates to udev-197, with no mention of
udev-200, but...
when I uncomment them:
=sys-fs/udev-181
=virtual/udev-181
emerge
on
> selected: 1.1.0-r3
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> sys-fs/udev
> selected: 250
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> sys-devel/clang
> selected: 13.0.1
> protected: none
> omitted: 14.0.4
>
> sys-devel/clang-runtime
On Friday 14 March 2008, Johan Blåbäck wrote:
I know nothing about this (udev), so any outside input to this
discussion would be good.
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/hotplug/udev-FAQ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Udev
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/udev-guide.xml
--
Regards
Justin schrieb:
to which udev version should be upgraded for the baselayout2?
Openrc requires sys-fs/udev-118-r2. As far as i know udev-120 is going
to be stabilized with openrc/baselayout-2 which I use too. Didn't have
any problems so far!
Regards,
Daniel
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Install udev as in portage. Then edit the kernel to remove
devfs - recompile and reboot.
Additionally, the guide to writing udev rules by Daniel Drake
(thanks a lot) has been updated:
Writing udev rules
Best regards
ce
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Currently I have udev-087-r1 and coldplug-20040920-r1 installed. It
would be my suggestion not to install udev-103 currently (it is marked
as ~x86).
udev-103 is now in the stable tree and cover the coldplug functions.
Coldplug is now 'useless'.
Hi,
I switched from devfs to udev 10 days ago, and since then every
nth boot will hang at 'initializing random number generator'
It try to read a /dev/urandom, does this device node created properly by
udev. In my box, there is corresponding rules in udev setting.
Cheers,
Zarick Lau
Bruce Hill wrote:
Too late, too tired, but do you have:
=sys-fs/udev-181
in /etc/portage/package.mask ?
Ehm... according to http://packages.gentoo.org/category/sys-fs?full_cat
udev-171-r9 is the only stable x86 version, and udev-181 doesn't exist
at all?!
-Matt (still using 171 because
On 2013-04-07 1:48 PM, Nick Khamis sym...@gmail.com wrote:
I just did got udev updated. Did all the steps in the news:
1. tempfs in kernel
2. nothing in /etc/udev/rules.d
3. removed udev-postmount from runlevel
4) check fstab for the /tmp
And it changed!
WHAT changed???
On 2013-08-12 7:37 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
I just confirmed that while I do have sys-fs/udev in world, but I *do*
have virtual/udev.
Crap... I meant I do NOT have sys-fs/eudev (or sys-fs/udev) in @world...
Rumen Yotov wrote:
Hi,
Recently saw that i have a udev-tarball enabled setup and think of
disabling it.
Wanna make a backup of the tarball before doing that, but can't find
where it is located/saved.
TIA. Rumen
/lib/udev-state/devices.tar.bz2 is hard coded in /sbin/rc
# Actually get udev
Zac Medico wrote:
Rumen Yotov wrote:
Hi,
Recently saw that i have a udev-tarball enabled setup and think of
disabling it.
Wanna make a backup of the tarball before doing that, but can't find
where it is located/saved.
TIA. Rumen
/lib/udev-state/devices.tar.bz2 is hard coded in /sbin/rc
Hi,
On Thursday 28 July 2005 08:51, Zarick Lau wrote:
Hi,
I switched from devfs to udev 10 days ago, and since then every
nth boot will hang at 'initializing random number generator'
It try to read a /dev/urandom, does this device node created properly by
udev. In my box
090910 Dale wrote:
I noticed I now have a udev in /etc/init.d/.
I checked, it is not running but udevd is not running either:
r...@smoker / # /etc/init.d/udev status
* status: stopped
r...@smoker / # ps aux | grep udev
root 30451 0.0 0.0 1888 504 pts/0 R+ 16:04 0:00 grep
On Sunday 01 May 2011 13:43:18 Carlos Sura wrote:
Hello,
I just have one question, reciently I read in a forum that HAL might be
deprecated on Gentoo, so, I started using UDEV:
hal and udev are unrelated.
USE= -hal udev
But, then I have this problem, updating xorg-server won't work
This seems to me like very happy news indeed, but I'm interested in contrary
opinions. There's a recent thread discussing how udev-197 breaks lvm2, but
that's a trivial fix once you know about it.
The problem is caused because many apps including lvm2 install their udev
config scripts in /usr
»Q«:
udev-197-r3 gave me this postinstall warning:
Upstream has removed the persistent-cd rules generator. If you need
persistent names for these devices, place udev rules for them
in /etc/udev/rules.d.
Well, I have had such a rule for a long time, and it worked ok until I
installed udev
On 2013-03-30 1:22 PM, Mark David Dumlao madum...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/30/2013 11:24 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Ok, I don't understand this...
snip
emerge -pvuDN world shows updates to BOTH virtual/udev-197-r2 *and*
udev-200, with strange Blockers referencing udev-186???
My reading
On 2013-08-01 4:04 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I switched when it was still fresh and it wasn't to bad from what I
recall. Just emerge -C udev and emerge eudev. I think I masked udev to
make sure it didn't get pulled in any more by something else but other
than that, it just worked
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, how does one restart udev? Does going to rc single
On 1/22/07, Jakob Buchgraber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
So I downgraded to udev-103 again and now I get the error message (on
startup) that /lib/udev/net.sh cannot be executed, because this file
doesn't exist!
I also tried reemerging udev, but it didn't help.
What kernel version are you
On Wednesday 12 December 2012 08:07:46 AM IST, James wrote:
OK so lots of updates (mostly kde 4.9.3)
to several systems today. 2 or the 3 are fine
One got hosed. Error message upon reboot
config_devdmpfs=y is required in your kernel configuration
for this version of udev to run
On 02/08/13 00:28, Tanstaafl wrote:
Hi all,
Ok, rehashing this, but please don't turn it into another udev vs
systemd thread.
I have an older server that I have been putting off this update,
debating on whether to update to the regular udev, or to eudev.
I've googled until my fingers
On 02/08/13 19:17, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-08-01 7:27 PM, William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Something like
olympus ~ # cat /etc/portage/package.mask
=sys-fs/udev-180
...
olympus ~ #
olympus ~ # grep udev /etc/portage/package.keywords
sys-fs/eudev ~amd64
=virtual/udev-206
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Corbin Bird <corbinb...@charter.net> wrote:
>
> On 12/21/2016 06:59 AM, Matthias Hanft wrote:
>> Corbin Bird wrote:
>>> The "sys-fs/eudev" package is the Gentoo fork of "sys-fs/udev" for
>>> people wh
On 12/6/05, Michael George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Already checked that. The root filesystem does contain /dev/null and
/dev/console are there. However, something is obviously breaking when
udev mounts the /dev system and then those devices are no longer
there...
Hmm, take a look
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:41:52 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Try checking a file
called /etc/udev/permissions.d/50-udev.permissions, this file sets
the permissions of devices during boot.
No. This has already changed since more than 10 versions of udev.
Permissions are now set in /etc
The 29/03/12, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:20:04 +0100
David W Noon dwn...@ntlworld.com wrote:
The Gentoo developers have been discussing just that. The reason is
that many of the daemons that can be started by udev scripts require
work files on /var, so we could well need
On 01/12/2013 03:00 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 01/11/2013 03:04:01 PM, walt wrote:
The problem is caused because many apps including lvm2 install their udev
config scripts in /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/ (where they never belonged in the
first place IMO) and they should instead now go in /lib
Am 15.02.2013 03:38, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it safe to unmerge sys-fs/udev-171-r9 it is blocking udev-197
As long as you don't stop udev, nor try to reboot before merging the
new version, yes.
Regards.
The more
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com writes:
The wiki is wrong. The script /etc/init.d/udev is part of sys-fs/udev,
which you need to uninstall before installing systemd. Perhaps it's
CONFIG_PROTECT'd, but anyway sys-fs/udev and sys-apps/systemd install
the udev binary in different
On Thu, 01 Aug 2013 12:28:38 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
I've googled until my fingers are blue, but cannot for the life of me
find any explicit instructions for *how* to switch from udev to eudev.
emerge -Ca udev
emerge -1a eudev
But there's not a lot of point as eudev isn't that different
Ok,
So I have used eudev before, without issue before. Things are moving along
so now I see an udev-215 upgrade to udev-261 on a system running lxde.
I intend to migrate this system to lxqt in the next few weeks, after
I build up a new workstation.
So changing from udev-215 to eudev-1.10-r2
Another 5 yr server that needs some care.
sys-fs/udev-151-r4 and a kernel without CONFIG_DEVTMPFS set.
The old udev blocks openrc etc etc ...
Aside from: install from scratch -
what happens if I upgrade udev before booting a kernel with
CONFIG_DEVTMPFS set?
Problems?
I'd like to upgrade
-- Logs begin at Mit 2012-08-15 20:16:00 CEST, end at Mit 2013-02-13
19:03:42 CET. --
Feb 13 18:48:30 enzo systemd-udevd[4415]: failed to execute
'/lib/udev/lmt-udev' '/lib/udev/lmt-udev auto': No such file or directory
Feb 13 18:48:30 enzo systemd-udevd[4519]: failed to execute
'/lib/udev/lmt-udev
be relevant as the hylafax ebuild does set some things up
for the uucp user.
What is the different between the output of this on both machines?
grep -r tty /{etc,lib}/udev/rules.d
machine with:
crw-rw 1 root dialout 4, 64 Jan 21 09:04 /dev/ttyS0
has:
grep -r tty /{etc,lib}/udev/rules.d
/lib/udev
On 1/4/2013 10:23, James wrote:
Dustin C. Hatch admiralnemo at gmail.com writes:
The problem is you are trying to downgrade sys-fs/udev but not
virtual/udev. If you want to force using udev-171, you need to mask both
the real and virtual atoms. Try this in /etc/portage/package.mask/udev
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 02:54:31AM +, James wrote:
James wireless at tampabay.rr.com writes:
So unless somebody can give me good reason, I'm downgrading to
udev-171 asap on this (only) system running udev 196...
(ps, I like to experiment, but not with udev et. al.)
Long night
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 11:46:01 -0400
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2013-03-27 10:33 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/27/2013 10:25 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Ok...
So, what is this all about?
Does all of this mean that udev is now going*completely* away
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, how does one restart udev? Does going to rc single then back
to rc default restart udev? Surely a person doesn't have to reboot
On Jan 3, 2012 7:35 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht nsebre...@piing.fr wrote:
The 03/01/12, Pandu Poluan wrote:
(Come to think of it, has *any* distro ever attempted this...
'unconventional of going udev-free?)
mdev is not an udev replacement. It's a very minimalist udev designed
for embedded
Upon syncing, my system wants to upgrade to eudev.
[blocks B] sys-fs/udev (sys-fs/udev is blocking sys-fs/eudev-0)
Not much out there; but I gleaned it is for those
that insist on a separate partition for /var and /usr.
Any other motivating reasons?
equery depends eudev
* These packages
with -*.
During a recent install, I found out the hard way that eudev (and udev)
do not install their init scripts without the openrc flag. As you can
see from the ebuild fragments below, they require the openrc flag to
pull in sys-fs/udev-init-scripts
From sys-fs/udev/udev-197-r8.ebuild
On 2013-08-09 8:24 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 07:12:50 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
I've googled until my fingers are blue, but cannot for the life of me
find any explicit instructions for *how* to switch from udev to
eudev.
emerge -Ca udev
emerge -1a eudev
On 05/08/13 23:18, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 10:24:27 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
But there's not a lot of point as eudev isn't that different to udev
now, AFAICT, and a recent update forced me to switch back to udev
because eudev hadn't been updated (on ~amd64).
Can you elaborate
On 26/09/13 04:30, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable).
I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents
systemd-204.
OK. So I need to downgrade virtual/udev to 200
I've noticed udev has been playing up lately. In particular, switching on
wireless/bluetooth would cause udev to be pegged to 100% CPU and bluetooth
won't work. USB won't work thereafter; e.g. unplugging a USB mouse and
replugging it is not detected.
I had a look at /etc/runlevels
Richard Fish wrote:
On 1/22/07, Jakob Buchgraber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
So I downgraded to udev-103 again and now I get the error message (on
startup) that /lib/udev/net.sh cannot be executed, because this file
doesn't exist!
I also tried reemerging udev, but it didn't help.
What
Try this (my fix is in /lib/udev/rules.d/40-gentoo.rules):
moriah ~ # equery f udev
* Searching for udev ...
* Contents of sys-fs/udev-171-r6:
/etc
/etc/conf.d
/etc/conf.d/udev
/etc/init.d
...
/lib/udev/rules.d
/lib/udev/rules.d/30-kernel-compat.rules
/lib/udev/rules.d/40-gentoo.rules
/lib
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ctrl-C to kill the emerge and
rm /var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/.udev-120.portage_lockfile
Egad and how many times have done that in other situations...
I tried emerge -vC udev followed by emerge -v udev
No help
Its just udev-120 that does this.
Before
Thank you. I am using the latest udev from Portage. The file I found in
/etc/udev/rules.d is 50-dev.rules. Haven't tired it yet but will tomorrow.
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:50:08 -0700, Tom Smith wrote:
What I'm having difficulty with is finding information on the illusive
Mark Knecht wrote:
This is, unfortunately, a very bad idea for removable media. What was
sdb2 today will become sdc2 tomorrow and the suggestion you make will
not work.
I'm having a fun time with this machine since I switched to udev.
Twice today the partitions did not mount using the LABEL
On Saturday 10 December 2005 18:02, Grant wrote:
gandalf ~ # emerge udev -epv | egrep plug|udev
[ebuild N ] sys-apps/hotplug-base-20040401 0 kB
[ebuild N ] sys-fs/udev-070-r1 (-selinux) -static 0 kB
What is the meaning of this? It looks like you aren't running a udev
system
Udev now handlles coldplug.
-Original Message-
From: pk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 12:37:54
To:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Coldplug deprecated by udev-103 update?
Hi!
After a sync this morning I get this:
Calculating world dependencies... done
On 25/11/06, Hans de Hartog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Normally, I'm not reluctant to solve blocks by
unmerging stuff but now I'm unsure what to do.
Unmerge udev-089 or coldplug or both?
I don't want to end up with missing either of them.
Your advice?
Hi,
Looking inside the coldplug ebuild
that actually matters is udev (upgraded from 103 to 104)
So I downgraded to udev-103 again and now I get the error message (on
startup) that /lib/udev/net.sh cannot be executed, because this file
doesn't exist!
I also tried reemerging udev, but it didn't help.
I didn't find anything about this issue
Neil Bothwick ha scritto:
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:37:28 +0100, brullo nulla wrote:
Does this mean that I need to install a new kernel to run udev-141 ?
Ok, I should run a new kernel *anyway* ... at this point the question
is: when I update the kernel, I can use the old udev-124-r1 until I
Helmut Jarausch schrieb am 07.06.2011 17:36:
When trying to emerge sys-fs/udisks-1.0.2-r4
it wants to downgrade sys-fs/udev from 171 to 168-r2
The udisks' ebuild contains
=sys-fs/udev-147[extras]
sys-fs/udev hasn't an 'extra' use flag
But sys-fs/udev-168-r2 has an extra use flag thus
From: Pandu Poluan [mailto:pa...@poluan.info]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 12:13 PM
BUT, in the same message, it is stated that Xorg *can* be compiled to *not*
try to communicate with udev.
I suspect a similar situation with Gnome.
IIRC, GNOME only needs udev for auto-mount support. gvfs
I can not find service udev-postmount ,Udev version is 194 , services udev
and udev-mount start at runlevel
On 25 October 2012 23:40, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
121025 sam new wrote:
I do not like to update my gentoo frequently cause compile takes
a long time, but I decided
1 - 100 of 8443 matches
Mail list logo
