I just reviewed that site. I find one discrepancy though. The articles the site shows for the efficacy of colloidal gold are using 15 or more mg of gold a day (and a CG of 1000 or higher PPM). The gold they offer is 10 ppm. Thus to duplicate the quantity taken in the studies would require 1.5 liters of their CG a day which is about 6 bottles costing about $200.
Are there any studies showing an effect at lower dosages? A teaspoon of 10 ppm CS would be less than 1/1000 of the dosage used in the studies. :< Is there any evidence that CS made by the arc method is superior to the method used in the studies? Marshall Chip Hoyle wrote: > Leo, > > I am currently using colloidal gold. I used for about a month several months > ago. It cost so much that I had to gather together all of the stuff to > generate > it myself. > I have found that the most profound effect is on my mood. I seems to keep me > happy and stress free. I have less anxietyand worry. My memory seems to be > improving as well. I can't address the long term effects at this poin, as > I've > only been taking it again for about a month. > > Check out Bill Fernalds site www.colloidalgold.com for more information. I > thought that many of the benefits attributed to the use of gold must be > marketing, but Bill offered those on the list a 50% off deal and I decided to > try a couple of bottles. I liked the effects so much I decided to make my > own. > > Chip Hoyle > > Leo Keaveney wrote: > > > Hi all, > > Roger, have you had any experiences resulting from your use of > > Colloidal Gold, if so, will you share them with us please. > > > > Leo > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <rogalt...@aol.com> > > To: <silver-list@eskimo.com> > > Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 1:19 PM > > Subject: Re: CS>Generators and Methods > > > > > In a message dated 7/7/01 9:13:18 PM EST, liat...@flash.net writes: > > > > > > << Subj: Re: CS>Generators and Methods > > > Date: 7/7/01 9:13:18 PM EST > > > From: liat...@flash.net (brooks bradley) > > > Reply-to: silver-list@eskimo.com > > > To: silver-list@eskimo.com > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks Brooks for your most valuable post. Your quantified results confirm > > > what most of us have (has? -- where's Marshalee when we need her) > > suspected > > > for quite some time. However, there are at least two remaining questions > > that > > > are of great interest. So if you're ready to answer them I would be most > > > grateful. > > > > > > 1. The primary reason I use HVAC instead of current controlled LVDC is > > that > > > the HVAC product ALWAYS has an indefinite shelf life whereas the current > > > controlled LVDC CS product has a shelf life that appears to be highly > > > dependent on the skill of the operator. Some claim their CS has an > > indefinite > > > shelf life (Ivan, for example), but others, myself included, get much more > > > modest stabilities. Care to comment? > > > > > > 2. The HVAC process appears, under certain circumstances (using a > > colloidal > > > gold "setup," for example), to have the capability of making a form of CS > > > that is almost totally particulate as opposed to the normal form of HVAC > > CS > > > which produces almost 100% ionic "CS". Have you tested the efficacy of > > these > > > two types of products using in vivos and/or in vitro methods? > > > > > > Thanks, Roger > > > > > > > > > -- > > > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > > > > > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: > > > silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com > > > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > > > > > > To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com > > > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com> > > > > > >
