Charles P Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only referenced once check is there to prevent typos and other similar
> errors that would have SIPp load a scenario with a variable only used once
> (the theory being why do you need to read or write to a variable if you
> never read or write from it again, basically like an unused variable
> warning from your compiler). If you don't need $5, you can use it for
> something unneeded like:
> <assign assign_to="5" value="0" />
This worked for me, I didn't need $5. Thanks a lot -- I'd have spent
a lot more time gawking at the error message otherwise.
> A better long term solution would be to modify the SIPp source code to
> make the whole match variable optional so that you don't need to jump
> through hoops like this.
Ah, now that I have read it, I thought it could have been a WARNING()
instead of an ERROR(), but apparently sipp didn't want to be that
easily forgiving. That doesn't make it any less useful a tool though.
This was an educational experience after all. :-)
Regards,
Sajith.
--
"the lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne."
-- Chaucer.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
