How is redshift compared to octane?
2013/4/4 James De Colling <james.decoll...@gmail.com> > Welcome to the "pro" card market... I only use quadros because that's what > the sells we use ship with... Long gone are the days when people cards were > worth their sticker price > On Apr 4, 2013 4:28 PM, "olivier jeannel" <olivier.jean...@noos.fr> > wrote: > >> I should be out of the office, but will test asap. >> For the quadro, well it was bundled with the workstation (HP Z620). It's >> no problem if the quadro is more expensive and produce better performance. >> It becomes a problem if they are really bellow game cards. >> Your gtx has more than 400 cores while the 4000 has 256... They are >> supposed to be stronger when working though... >> >> >> Le 04/04/2013 09:13, Octavian Ureche a écrit : >> >>> Here you go: >>> >>> http://www.nvidia.com/object/**product-quadro-4000-us.html<http://www.nvidia.com/object/product-quadro-4000-us.html> >>> http://www.geforce.com/**hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-** >>> gtx-470/specifications<http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-470/specifications> >>> >>> The last one is what i currently have. as you can see, the quadro's >>> memory bandwith, cuda cores and memory interface are below the gtx. But you >>> have bigger vram which means you can cram more into the scenes. >>> Speed wise, given the differences it might be slower at the actual >>> rendering, but we're talking gpu rendering here so i'm not sure if it's >>> going to be that much noticeable. >>> Do a render with both scenes and post your times in the forum. Then >>> we'll know better how hardware affects the performance. >>> >>> To be honest, i always found quadros to be extremely overpriced, but >>> maybe that's just me. >>> >> >>
