On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:56 PM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is that a proposal to never leave 1.x :) I guess numbers do allow it ... > > Lance Norskog wrote: >> In practical terms, calling a release 2.0 means it will never finish. >> "One last feature! No, really!" happens with 1.x. A Solr 2.0 will be >> killed by "Let's rewrite this!" >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-system_effect
Well, Solr 1.4 is is almost a 2.0 to me already, so a short leap to me ;) >> >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> On Nov 19, 2009, at 9:31 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: >>> >>> >>>> What should the next version of Solr be? >>>> >>>> Options: >>>> >>>> - have a Solr 2.0 with a lucene 3.x >>>> >>> +1. This gives us a chance to remove some deprecated stuff, too. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > >
