Hi all. I think it's work for SpamAssasin, not for Spamdyke. Don't try to make Swiss Army knife from your great application, Sam!
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:37:34 -0600 Sam Clippinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, spamdyke isn't designed to block messages based on message > headers. Header information (such as the Subject line) isn't > available until after spamdyke has decided to accept the message. I > intend to add Subject line logging to spamdyke in a future version, > to make it easier to troubleshoot problems, but blocking based on > Subject would require a major rewrite. > > I wrote more about this question here: > http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/FAQ.html#SUGGESTION3 > > -- Sam Clippinger > > J-P Raymond wrote: > > No server 1 is not running qmail (eims), but it's not a front-end > > server they are both fully fonctionnal server. The only reason I > > did that is because server 1 spam filters are much more complete > > than server 2. > > When I start working on those server I had less knowledge in linux > > so I didn't want to mess to much with the qmail setup. > > > > I've build a very efficient filter on server 1 but now clients on > > qmail complain they receive too much spam :-) (only 2 clients are > > filtered by going on server1) so when I found spamdyke I saw an > > opportunity to improve qmail. So far it's working . > > > > On server 1 I'm able to analyse the header of my emails is it > > possible to do that with spamdyke ? > > > > Ex : > > ehlo domain (I think this one is possible) > > mail from > > mail to > > subject > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:29:34 -0600 > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > To: spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org > > > Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] reject-missing-sender-mx problem > > > > > > Correct. spamdyke returns 4xx codes for filters that are > > > triggered by missing DNS records (missing MX, missing rDNS, > > > unresolvable rDNS). This is because spamdyke can't know if the > > > record truly doesn't exist or if the DNS servers are just slow. > > > Using a 4xx code will cause the remote server to try again. If > > > the problem was a slow DNS server, a second attempt may be > > > successful. Other filters use 5xx codes because the answers are > > > definite (rDNS keywords, blacklists, earlytalkers). > > > > > > The line you found in spamdyke.h is the one you want. If you > > > change "REJECT_SEVERITY_TEMPORARY" to > > > "REJECT_SEVERITY_PERMANENT", spamdyke will return a 5xx code for > > > the missing MX test. Be aware, however, that a slow or > > > overloaded DNS server could cause some of your mail to be > > > rejected incorrectly. > > > > > > In your setup, is server 1 running qmail? It would be better to > > > install spamdyke there if possible. > > > > > > -- Sam Clippinger > > > > > > J-P Raymond wrote: > > > > I think I found my answer : spamdyke.h > > > > > > > > #define REJECTION_DATA_SENDER_NO_MX > > > > #{ REJECT_SEVERITY_TEMPORARY, > > > > ERROR_SENDER_NO_MX, STRLEN(ERROR_SENDER_NO_MX), > > > > "DENIED_SENDER_NO_MX" } > > > > > > > > REJECT_SEVERITY_TEMPORARY > > > > > > > > Why temporary because DNS could failed to answer and this > > > > email > > would be > > > > bounced for no reason ? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > To: spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org > > > > Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:10:05 -0500 > > > > Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] reject-missing-sender-mx problem > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I'm having problems with this rule ! It will be a bit > > > > difficult to explain so stay with me: > > > > > > > > Setup : 2 servers > > > > > > > > server 1 is filtering mail for server 2 > > > > server 2 is running spamdyke with qmail > > > > > > > > If qmail refuse a message (sent by server1) with a non > > > > permanent error code 4XX, server 1 keep that email in queue > > > > until it can be sent again or timeout ! (fine) (That was my > > > > problem with the bare LF because stray LF is always 4xx on > > > > qmail not 55X permanent.) > > > > > > > > But server 1 don't deliver the other message received after > > > > the one with the 4xx error until this message timout. (bad) > > > > So basicaly queue to that domain can build up until this > > > > message is bounce or timeout. > > > > > > > > If qmail sends a 550 permanent error no problem the email is > > > > discarded and the other emails can be delivered. > > > > > > > > That beeing said, > > > > > > > > Now I've tried to activate the reject-missing-sender-mx setting > > > > on spamdyke but this rule did the same thing. I've check my log > > > > (server1) and I saw : 554 Refused. The domain of your sender > > > > address has no mail exchanger (MX). > > > > > > > > So fine 554 is a permanent error but why my other server act > > > > like a 4XX error code. I would like to know if their is an > > > > error in the error code sent by spamdyke on that particular > > > > filter ? > > > > > > > > I know it's really specific and not many of you will experience > > > > something like that but it's worth asking > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > <http:///> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > spamdyke-users mailing list > > > > spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org > > > > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > > > _______________________________________________ > > > spamdyke-users mailing list > > > spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org > > > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > spamdyke-users mailing list > > spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org > > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > _______________________________________________ > spamdyke-users mailing list > spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Regards Nicholas A. Novozhilov, NAN6-RIPE NTR Lab System administrator _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
