stackless.com with tarballs. Cheers, Richard.
On 1/6/14, Werner Thie <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > will that happen on stackless.com with tarballs or somewhere else? > > Although being interested in stackless for several years, for me > following the recent discussions were both enlightening as well as > frustrating, because there is so little information painting a big > picture of all the bits and pieces of stackless and its relatives. > > Maybe painting an inheritance tree would help? > > With my attempt having failed at bringing stackless to the main homebrew > repos on OSX on the grounds that 'it is confusing the user because this > is just another python and we already have enough problems with OXS's > system python and the homebrew one' I felt some hope when reading the > discussions about naming stackless differently. > > My plan still is to have stackless as a brew formula on OSX and as a > port on FreeBSD, so anything which separates stackless from the CPython > installation seems to me a step into the right direction. > > Werner > > On 1/5/14 12:24 PM, Richard Tew wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've been reflecting on the 2.7.6 and 3.3.3 releases of Stackless, and >> how I think it's important we do them in a timely fashion. >> >> However, there are a decent number of outstanding issues, so I'd like >> to propose a different approach. >> >> I plan to do three release candidate releases: >> >> 2.7.6 >> 3.3.3 >> 3.4.0 >> >> These will only include the latest finalised changes. >> >> I'll also make a list of outstanding things that need to be addressed >> before we can do final releases, and then once these are done, I'll >> tag and package up the official source releases. >> >> Then people can step up to do windows and macos installers. >> >> My hope is that then someone who goes to the Stackless web site won't >> see old versions only being available. Ideally we'd be able to >> generate windows and macos installers for the intermediate release >> candidates, but.. I'm not sure anyone with the right software licenses >> will find the time. We'll see. >> >> Thoughts? Ideas? >> >> Cheers, >> Richard. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Stackless mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Stackless mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless > _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
