was this to indicate that there is new src tars posted to the web site? if
so i can't see them or was this just indicating that the repository had
been updated?



On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Richard Tew <[email protected]> wrote:

> stackless.com with tarballs.
>
> Cheers,
> Richard.
>
> On 1/6/14, Werner Thie <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > will that happen on stackless.com with tarballs or somewhere else?
> >
> > Although being interested in stackless for several years, for me
> > following the recent discussions were both enlightening as well as
> > frustrating, because there is so little information painting a big
> > picture of all the bits and pieces of stackless and its relatives.
> >
> > Maybe painting an inheritance tree would help?
> >
> > With my attempt having failed at bringing stackless to the main homebrew
> > repos on OSX on the grounds that 'it is confusing the user because this
> > is just another python and we already have enough problems with OXS's
> > system python and the homebrew one' I felt some hope when reading the
> > discussions about naming stackless differently.
> >
> > My plan still is to have stackless as a brew formula on OSX and as a
> > port on FreeBSD, so anything which separates stackless from the CPython
> > installation seems to me a step into the right direction.
> >
> > Werner
> >
> > On 1/5/14 12:24 PM, Richard Tew wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've been reflecting on the 2.7.6 and 3.3.3 releases of Stackless, and
> >> how I think it's important we do them in a timely fashion.
> >>
> >> However, there are a decent number of outstanding issues, so I'd like
> >> to propose a different approach.
> >>
> >> I plan to do three release candidate releases:
> >>
> >> 2.7.6
> >> 3.3.3
> >> 3.4.0
> >>
> >> These will only include the latest finalised changes.
> >>
> >> I'll also make a list of outstanding things that need to be addressed
> >> before we can do final releases, and then once these are done, I'll
> >> tag and package up the official source releases.
> >>
> >> Then people can step up to do windows and macos installers.
> >>
> >> My hope is that then someone who goes to the Stackless web site won't
> >> see old versions only being available.  Ideally we'd be able to
> >> generate windows and macos installers for the intermediate release
> >> candidates, but.. I'm not sure anyone with the right software licenses
> >> will find the time.  We'll see.
> >>
> >> Thoughts? Ideas?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Richard.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Stackless mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Stackless mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Stackless mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
>



-- 
Life: Bah, I will worry about it when it is over.
_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless

Reply via email to