3.3, then?  or wait for the upcoming 3.4?
Is anyone using 3.2 so that wee need to continue supporting it (people seem to 
agree that 3.3 is the first 3.x version that is good enough for a switch)
K

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of lars van Gemerden
Sent: 6. janúar 2014 12:34
To: The Stackless Python Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Stackless] Upcoming Stackless releases

I expect to go there (3.x) in a next version of my application

CL

On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Kristján Valur Jónsson 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
> [mailto:stackless-<mailto:stackless->
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Christian 
> Tismer
> Sent: 6. janúar 2014 10:49
> To: The Stackless Python Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Stackless] Upcoming Stackless releases
>
> On 06.01.14 10:08, Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote:
> > Should we close off the 3.2-slp branch?
> > It looks like a very dead horse, even though merging from 3.2-slp to
> > 3.3-slp is the single most effortless part of stackless branch
> > management :)
>
> No objection to close that after merging.
> Unlike the 2.X series, 3.X seems to have little to no history to be 
> maintained.
>
Is anyone using stackless 3.2?  or any stackless 3.x for that matter?
I'd be surprised, to be honest :)

K
_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless



--
====================================
Lars van Gemerden
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
+31 6 26 88 55 39
====================================
_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless

Reply via email to