Isn't this the story of 3.x's life? Lot's of people planning on moving there "when the stars align"?
On 1/7/14, lars van Gemerden <[email protected]> wrote: > I expect to go there (3.x) in a next version of my application > > CL > > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Kristján Valur Jónsson < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: [email protected] [mailto:stackless- >> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Christian Tismer >> > Sent: 6. janúar 2014 10:49 >> > To: The Stackless Python Mailing List >> > Subject: Re: [Stackless] Upcoming Stackless releases >> > >> > On 06.01.14 10:08, Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote: >> > > Should we close off the 3.2-slp branch? >> > > It looks like a very dead horse, even though merging from 3.2-slp to >> > > 3.3-slp is the single most effortless part of stackless branch >> > > management :) >> > >> > No objection to close that after merging. >> > Unlike the 2.X series, 3.X seems to have little to no history to be >> maintained. >> > >> >> Is anyone using stackless 3.2? or any stackless 3.x for that matter? >> I'd be surprised, to be honest :) >> >> K >> _______________________________________________ >> Stackless mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless >> > > > > -- > ==================================== > Lars van Gemerden > [email protected] > +31 6 26 88 55 39 > ==================================== > _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
