It does no harm to leave 3.2 around, I think. If it were time to close it, you wouldn't need to ask.
If our 3.4 is really cpython's default, then we should rename it for consistency. Cheers, Richard. On 1/6/14, Kristján Valur Jónsson <[email protected]> wrote: > Should we close off the 3.2-slp branch? > It looks like a very dead horse, even though merging from 3.2-slp to 3.3-slp > is the single most effortless part of stackless branch management :) > > I would also suggest that we create a "default-slp" branch, to mirror the > current "default". Essentially, rename what 3.4-slp branch there exists out > there > as "default-slp" for consistency with the non-slp tree. > K > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:stackless- >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Tew >> Sent: 5. janúar 2014 22:25 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [Stackless] Upcoming Stackless releases >> >> Hi, >> >> I've been reflecting on the 2.7.6 and 3.3.3 releases of Stackless, and how >> I >> think it's important we do them in a timely fashion. >> >> However, there are a decent number of outstanding issues, so I'd like to >> propose a different approach. >> >> I plan to do three release candidate releases: >> >> 2.7.6 >> 3.3.3 >> 3.4.0 >> >> These will only include the latest finalised changes. >> >> I'll also make a list of outstanding things that need to be addressed >> before >> we can do final releases, and then once these are done, I'll tag and >> package >> up the official source releases. >> >> Then people can step up to do windows and macos installers. >> >> My hope is that then someone who goes to the Stackless web site won't see >> old versions only being available. Ideally we'd be able to generate >> windows >> and macos installers for the intermediate release candidates, but.. I'm >> not >> sure anyone with the right software licenses will find the time. We'll >> see. >> >> Thoughts? Ideas? >> >> Cheers, >> Richard. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Stackless mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless > > > > _______________________________________________ > Stackless mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless > _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
