On 3 May 2015 at 10:22, David Bannon <dban...@internode.on.net> wrote:
> > No possible, in any readable way, to render something like this. Either > all the icons appear on top of each other or, most are discarded. And > imagine just how many columns need be added to the render database. > The proposed categories are almost a mapping of the amenity to broad categories. So the mapper would have to identify the amenities, decide on a corresponding category, and tag that. I can't see any reason why this responsibility should be given to the mapper. The corresponding categories may be better held in a software ruleset, and the mapper just enumerate the amenities on the campsite that they are aware of. Ian.
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
