Nov 30, 2020, 04:21 by graemefi...@gmail.com: >> Please consider how important the location is for the driver/operator, and >> that the culvert is not just somewhere along a (long) length of road. >> > > Currently, at least, tunnel=culvert doesn't render on the road, it only shows > as a faint dotted line for the stream / drain passing under the road, so > won't be very visible (at least that's how they show in OSMand+ - other nav > programs may be different?) > And OSM is open data, so if someone is interested in culverts they can make their own rendering! >> Another reason is most bridges and culverts have formal >> structure/identification numbers. We would like to see OpenStreetMap cater >> for both spatial and a-spatial relationships to external systems - typically >> those in local and state government. Many of these 'external' systems do not >> have a spatial component and would compliment each other nicely. >> > > That's likely to be the biggest problem. Where are you getting the weight > restriction limits? I've driven over quite a few bridges & culverts, in both > built-up & country areas, & very few of them have weight limits posted. If > you're accessing external (Govt?) data-bases that have these details listed, > do we have permission to use their data in OSM? > see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines for more info
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
