Hi everybody! @Jo and @Tim: I am not sure about the license and I was asking myself if I could use it or not... Actually, it's a friend of mine, who is also mapper, who told me he obtains this file from the city of Liege a couple of years ago. He could use it for maps from pro-velo, I think. I am going to clarify that with him, I think he is advised about this question of license but he did not told me explicitly the data were open.
(This user also had a contact last month with the service of "urbanisme" who use map-tools, which was quite enthusiast as he explained OSM... Maybe something, one day? We are going to talk again with this service in a couple of days...) @Jo: Yes, your proposition sounds good for me. I have already made import from OSM into a postgis database. I was thinking about something with a php (i know php better than python) script and a database with a recent import. I don't have a lot of time for doing that, if you feel ready to help me I will be happy... If, you too, you don't have much time I will cope, but it won't be next week... @all: I don't like the tag cycleway=opposite too, for the same reason: it is confusing. But it is a lot more used than bicycle:oneway=no or oneway:bicycle=no. cycleway=opposite is used 17212 times, oneway:bicycle 673 and bicycle:oneway 1228. The question is: should we not change something because it is used many times? Or should we adopt tag habits we are consistent (FR: cohérent)? May i, in my future screen, add both tags (cycleway=opposite + bicycle:oneway=no) ? Julien 2011/3/22 Ben Laenen <benlae...@gmail.com> > Andre Engels wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Renaud MICHEL <r.h.michel+...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > On mardi 22 mars 2011 at 18:39, Jo wrote : > > >> cycleway=opposite (converted to the proper xml-format) and tag the way > > >> as modified. > > > > > > I don't think that tag is appropriate. > > > It implies that there is a real cycleway on the road, but in Liege (and > > > many other places in wallonia) you simply have an exclusion to the > > > oneway for bicycles. > > > > No, cycleway=opposite means exactly that - a one way road that > > cyclists are allowed to ride in the opposite direction. See > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway > > The main problem with it is that it doesn't tell anything about mopeds. As > you > know many oneway streets also allow mopeds class A in the opposite > direction. > > My preference has always gone to > > bicycle:oneway=no > moped_A:oneway=no > > and I'm sure that the reasoning why I choose this and not oneway:bicycle=no > can be found in a couple of places in different discussions in mailing > lists > and wiki, but I'm not gonna dig those up now. My unfinished traffic signs > tool > also makes use of these: > http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~eimai/verkeersborden/ > > Ben > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
