On 05/12/16 17:19, Colin Smale wrote:
This reminds me of "unsuitable for HGVs" which IIRC has been the subject of debate in the past. One approach would be "hgv=unsuitable" meaning "legally yes but not advised". That seems to be exactly what we need here. Perhaps we could have "foot=unsuitable" for this path?
Unsuitable for heavy goods vehicles is actual signage on the ground, not a subjective judgement by the mapper; such signs really exist. Allowing mappers to map this other than based on signage would encourage NIMBYist marking of roads as such.
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
