Jun 2, 2020, 20:16 by stevea...@softworkers.com: > "this IS residential landuse." (Not COULD BE, but IS). Yes, this land might > be "natural" now, including being "treed," but I could still build a patio > and bbq there after perhaps cutting down some trees, it is my residential > land and I am allowed to do that, meaning it has residential use, even if it > is "unimproved" presently. > It is a residential property, not a residential landuse. > These facts do add to the difficulty: OSM doesn't wish to appear to be > removing property rights from residential landowners (by diminishing > landuse=residential areas) > Are there people somehow believing that edits in OSM affect property rights and may remove them? That is ridiculous. > but at the same time, significant portions of these areas do remain in a > natural state, while distinctly and presently "having" residential landuse. > For me and in my region (Poland) it would be treated as a clearly incorrect mapping.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
