2009/4/30, Andy Allan <gravityst...@gmail.com>: > Every time it gets discussed, it becomes *less* clear how it's being > used to me. And I'm mightily concerned that the 10 people discussing > it on these lists might be in no way representative of the 14,990 > people who are mapping paths and aren't in these discussions.
If you read the proposal on the wiki, you should be able to get an idea of what highway=path was *meant* to be. (an thats not "a very narrow or rough way in the forest, worse than footway") Btw how clear is the current usage of highway=cycleway to you? It ranges from "officially designated cycleway", "way that is comfortably usable by bike" to "some way you *could* physically use with a bicycle (and wake up in hospital)". ;-) -Martin _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
