2009/8/20 Apollinaris Schoell <ascho...@gmail.com>: > how could you do this practically? aligning 18 lanes as individual > ways is impossible in the current data model and editors.
Why? It's very possible: just do it. Btw: I's not 18 lanes, but 1+parking+1+divider+2+divider+3+divider+3+divider+2+divider+buslane+divider+pedestrian+cyclelane+1+divider, so I was not just counting the lanes but also the dividers (and it's more than 18). Currently that's different ways (because of the dividers) with lanes=3, lanes=2, etc., which does somehow work, but not represent well the situation at junctions. > agree that ways with dividers should be separate ways because routing > must know crossing is not allowed. adding this info to any lane > concept will make it too complicated Yes, but maybe you got me wrong: I suggested to draw and tag the dividers as well. > as soon as crossing is allowed all lanes can be modeled with any multi > lane numbering scheme. > having them as separate ways is wrong then > because routing will not work for lane changes. that what exactly my point: It _will_ be possible with this kind of relation, that indicates, where you can cross. This is IMHO necessary e.g. for motorway-ramps, separately mapped pavements and cycleways, etc. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
