Dave Stubbs wrote: > I wouldn't read too much into it, especially as they said, > "we’ve almost certainly got at least some of it wrong but hopefully we > got part of it right and can correct the rest as we go" > > Dave > > You see, this is the problem. I don't think, in this instance, they've done anything wrong. This is an OSM cock-up. I think it's quite selfish to expect others to pick up the pieces of, what I see, as lazy implementation.
Who, within OSM & in their right sense of mind, would object to being forced to use just Yes/No. I mean it's just an on/off switch! Cheers Dave F. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
