> highway=traffic_signals + name=* are now also visible:
Great!

> traffic_lights on complex crossroads
> Area or Relation
I prefer to use relation.
I'm afraid of effects to routing topology when signals or roundabouts
are written as an area.

As theory, the names of Japanese traffic signals are given to each
signals, not to a junction.
(and basically, the signals on a same junction has same names)



2013/3/27 Christian Quest <cqu...@openstreetmap.fr>:
> highway=traffic_signals + name=* are now also visible:
> http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/?lon=139.71686&lat=35.61534&zoom=18
>
> You'll see that adding names to traffic_lights on complex crossroads
> causes the same name to be rendered multiple times in some places:
> http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/?lon=139.71825&lat=35.61857&zoom=18
>
> A better tagging scheme seems necessary as one "thing" should be in
> the database just once.
>
> If we could avoid relations and use either the junction=yes or a
> place=junction/crossroad (place name are usually meant to be rendered
> that's why I'm thinking about it).
>
> Think also about Nominatim... place=* makes more sense for that purpose.
>
>
> 2013/3/25 Vladimir Vyskocil <vladimir.vysko...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> And there are more than 7000 nodes with highway=traffic_signals and name=*
>> in Tokyo and its suburbs !
>> Another country, another solution for the same tagging "problem".
>>
>> Vlad.
>
> --
> Christian Quest - OpenStreetMap France
> Synthèse du Week-end "SOTM-FR" à Lyon : 
> http://openstreetmap.fr/synthese-sotmfr
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk



-- 
Satoshi IIDA
mail: nyamp...@gmail.com
twitter: @nyampire

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to