*************
The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org
************
Hi Alex
In my limited experience with LRH tech which amounts to auditing up to life
repair (a minor level below the grades) and a little experience with metered
coaduiting, I found that the tech is workable and does get results.
My problem with the LRH approach is that it requires a separate auditor to
make it work. I get into games conditions with the auditor so make poor
progress with LRH tech. Theoretically the auditor and c/s should have handled
this but the reality was i made life difficult for them because of my
compulsive games playing.
To me TROM is excellent because it is entirely up to me what progress I make
and when I work at timebreaking or not. I can spend all day at it or take a
week off. I still play games with the mind by not persisting as much as I
could but I make up for that by continuing to study and work at TROM so that I
will eventually reach my goals.
What is wrong with LRH tech is a big subject. LRH gave some 3000 lectures and
wrote books and issued thousands of policy letters detailing how the tech was
to be applied over a span of 30 years. Just what part of the tech do you want
to address?
Sincerely
Pete
>________________________________
>From: Alexander Graf <i...@alexander-graf.de>
>To: trom@lists.newciv.org
>Sent: Saturday, October 1, 2011 4:19 PM
>Subject: [TROM1] what is wrong about LRH tech?
>
>*************
>The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org
>************
>
>
>Hi Trommers,
>
>just a question thats on my mind: what is wrong about LRH-tech? not the
>application by the church, just the tech.
>
>and, are there any other germans on this list besides leo?
>
>yours
>alex
>
>_______________________________________________
>Trom mailing list
>Trom@lists.newciv.org
>http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
Trom@lists.newciv.org
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
