Martin,
don't get me wrong. I've got no problem with the patch, I was just explaining what I do and why. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Work: http://www.multitask.com.au Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers Martin van den Bemt To: Turbine Maven Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> et> cc: Subject: Re: Test behaviour 05/30/02 05:15 PM Please respond to "Turbine Maven Developers List" Ok, You personally don't like working that way, What is your problem with this then, since the default is to fail ? There are enough people making builds with failing tests (I did yesterday with maven btw). Just an example ;) and as I mentioned in another mail : so is Eclipse ;). I really don't want to start my own bracch, just because I miss this one feature.. Mvgr, Martin On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 02:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Martin, > > personal preferences here: I'd rather not make it allowable to pass the > build with a bad test. Seriously it's a motivation for either coding the > tests right and having a stable product. > > If you want to see what the current behaviour of something is, when I do > it, i simply write to system out what it is that I'm interested in as part > of the test, rather than placing it in an assert statement. > -- > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting > Work: http://www.multitask.com.au > Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers > > > > Martin van den > Bemt To: Turbine Maven Developers List > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > et> cc: > Subject: Test behaviour > 05/30/02 01:00 > AM > Please respond > to "Turbine > Maven > Developers > List" > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > The default test behaviour of maven is to fail the build, > Since I don't want that in some cases, since I am failing tests > intentionally (why?? : I am writing testcases for something I don't > know the intended behaviour of and the current behaviour strikes me as > odd or buggy, I will write the test as I see fit, and ask someone who > knows to get it the it's supposed to be -; hope you still with me..) > > For this to work I have attached a patch, which allows a property to be > set in your favorit properties file. Default behaviour is still to fail > the test though.. > > Have fun.. > > Mvgr, > Martin > > > (See attached file: dontfailontests.diff)-- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: < > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: < > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ---- > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
