Please see changes below:-

- It is still missing the design diagram file(
http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/rdb-das-class-diagram.html). It seems
you've uploaded it as attachment, but I don't know why it is not loading on
the page.

[1]url for non-committer is
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/RDB+DAS+class+diagram
with file(available) ClassDiag.jpg

[2]url for committer is
http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/rdb-das-class-diagram.html with file
(missing) ClassDian.jpg

I guess when Simon L did the uploads from [1] to [2](JIRA-1335), the .jpg
did not get uploaded. Will you please see if you can upload the same? This
will resolve the problem.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- On ResultSetProcessor description the word GrapbBuilderMetadata is
incorrect written.

Done
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- On Configuration Schema I think it should be made explicit that the order
ResultDescriptor are declared are the order they appear on ResultSet. Am I
wrong?

-Done
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- What SingleTableRegistry is used for? On its description it says it has
now functionality.

This is supposed to be used when there are no relationships in config (as
per the current code
of caller to SingleTableRegistry. But the code of SingleTableRegistry has
nothing in it (empty method) So, it looks like this class is never used in
reality. Let us see if somebody else from DAS can shed some light on this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regards,
Amita


On 6/22/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Amita, I have reviewed the RDB DAS Architecture Guide:

- It is still missing the design diagram file(
http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/rdb-das-class-diagram.html). It seems
you've uploaded it as attachment, but I don't know why it is not loading
on
the page.

- On ResultSetProcessor description the word GrapbBuilderMetadata is
incorrect written.

- On Configuration Schema I think it should be made explicit that the
order
ResultDescriptor are declared are the order they appear on ResultSet. Am I
wrong?

- What SingleTableRegistry is used for? On its description it says it has
now functionality.

PS: I could fix some of these issues I`ve pointed, but I don't know why
I'm
not being able to edit it : (

Regards,
Adriano Crestani

On 6/15/07, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

   Hi Luciano,
   I tested latest from trunk and the issues discussed here seemed to be
fixed
   now. Thank you very much.

   Regards,
   Amita


   On 6/15/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
   >
   > Thanks Amita for looking into this...
   > I have fixed the distribution issue as in TUSCANY-1348, and the
   > logging issue as in TUSCANY-1349. I also noticed an issue with
logging
   > in dbConfig, where we were not checking if logging was enabled and
   > always calling log, and I have also fixed that.
   >
   > Please let me know if things are looking better now.
   >
   > On 6/14/07, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
   > > Small update, tried to build and test with empty repos and it went
   > through
   > > with no issues.
   > >
   > > Regards,
   > > Amita
   > >
   > > On 6/13/07, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
   > > >
   > > > Things tested to be working -
   > > > all UT as part of mvn build
   > > > all samples in different browsers.
   > > >
   > > > Apart from das\distribution\binary\pom.xml - change and
documentation
   > > > changes in JIRA 1335, I have a doubt in logging mechanism in web
   > samples.
   > > >
   > > > In DBConfig utility , the code uses Logger.getLogger(className) -
to
   > get
   > > > logger from log4j.
   > > >
   > > > Whereas in all RDB DAS code, it is
   > > > LoggerFactory.INSTANCE.getLogger(className) - to get logger from
RDB
   > DAS
   > > > util.
   > > > In this, the level is OFF - hardcoded in the code.
   > > >
   > > > So, when the log4j.properties file is used in tomcat to switch on
   > logging,
   > > > the logging works for DBConfig (as it is using direct log4j), but
   > logging
   > > > does not switch on for RDB DAS classes, as it is hardcoded OFF in
the
   > RDB
   > > > DAS jar.
   > > >
   > > > Is this the desired behavior? Will there be any need to switch on
   > logging
   > > > in web samples for RDB DAS code and how to do it without touching
   > > > tuscany-das-rdb-1.0-incubating.jar?
   > > >
   > > > Regards,
   > > > Amita
   > > >
   > > > On 6/11/07, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
   > > > >
   > > > > Hi All,
   > > > >
   > > > > When tried mvn -Pdistribution on das:-
   > > > > das\distribution\binary\pom.xml - does not list ajax web sample
   > under
   > > > > dependency and thus does not package same
   > > > >
   > > > > As now, non-committer does not have access to edit wiki, I have
   > created
   > > > > JIRA-TUSCANY-1335 for all the pending updates for DAS I was
doing.
   > Please
   > > > > see how these can be completed using attached zipped files.
   > > > >
   > > > > Architecture Guide -
   >

http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/RDB+DAS+architecture+guide
   > > > >
   > > > > images to upload - ClassDiag.jpg, rdbDAS.gif
   > > > >
   > > > > User Guide -
   > > > >
   >
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/RDB+DAS+-+User+Guide
   > > > > Under Samples(See Capabilities in use)
   > > > > Put links for:-
   > > > > Web Sample -
   > > > >
   >

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/das/samples/companyweb/readme.htm
   > > > > J2SE Sample -
   > > > >
   >

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/das/samples/customer/readme.htm
   > > > > Advanced Web Sample -
   >

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/das/samples/sample-ajax-das/readme.htm
   > > > >
   > > > >
   > > > > Development Guide - DAS_Java_Development_Guide.txt - need to
add
to
   > wiki
   > > > >
   > > > > need to checkin under
   >

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/das/distribution/src/main/release/RELEASE
   > > > > NOTES
   > > > > RELEASE_NOTES.txt
   > > > >
   > > > > About to complete CHANGES.txt , will add by eod to JIRA 1335..
   > > > >
   > > > > Regards,
   > > > > Amita
   > > > >
   > > > > On 6/10/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
wrote:
   > > > > >
   > > > > > I went through all das samples and they seem to be working
fine on
   > > > > > Windows
   > > > > > XP Home Edition SP 2 environment. I also corrected some links
on
   > > > > > readmes
   > > > > > that were pointing to old tuscany website.
   > > > > >
   > > > > > I ran the rat on java/das directory and added Apache Licence
   > header to
   > > > > > files
   > > > > > that were missing it.
   > > > > >
   > > > > > Regards,
   > > > > > Adriano Crestani
   > > > > >
   > > > > > On 6/8/07, Luciano Resende < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
   > > > > > >
   > > > > > > First of all, let me thank you all for helping on this
release.
   > > > > > > Recently there has been a lot of progress, and things are
   > looking
   > > > > > good
   > > > > > > from the list of issues we had listed in the wiki [1]. The
   > remaining
   > > > > > > documentation tasks could probably go in parallel with the
   > release
   > > > > > > candidates. So, we should start thinking about creating a
branch
   > for
   > > > > > > the next release sometime soon, probably over the weekend
or
   > Monday
   > > > > > > and then start publishing release candidates from that.
   > > > > > >
   > > > > > > Also, I think we should look into the following items
before
we
   > > > > > create
   > > > > > > the first RC :
   > > > > > >
   > > > > > >    - run rat and make the results available
   > > > > > >    - review the contents of license, readme, release_notes,
   > changes,
   > > > > > etc
   > > > > > >    - review javadoc
   > > > > > >    - make sure samples readme are updated and correct and
the
   > > > > > samples
   > > > > > > are working ok on different environments
   > > > > > >
   > > > > > > I'd also like to suggest two other things :
   > > > > > >    - Name the release beta1, to be aligned with the beta1
   > release of
   > > > > > SDO.
   > > > > > >    - Any blocking issue to be tracked as blocking JIRA and
   > directly
   > > > > > > assigned to beta1 release.
   > > > > > >
   > > > > > > Does this sound ok to everyone?  Any Thoughts ?
   > > > > > >
   > > > > > >
   > > > > > > [1]
   > > > > > >
   >

http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/RDB+DAS+-+Java+DAS+Beta1+Release
   > > > > >
   > > > > > >
   > > > > > >
   > > > > > > --
   > > > > > > Luciano Resende
   > > > > > > Apache Tuscany Committer
   > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
   > > > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
   > > > > > >
   > > > > > >
   > > > > >
   > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
   > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   > > > > > >
   > > > > > >
   > > > > >
   > > > >
   > > > >
   > > >
   > >
   >
   >
   > --
   > Luciano Resende
   > Apache Tuscany Committer
   > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
   > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
   >
   > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
   > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   >
   >

Reply via email to