Actually, I don't think I did that release. I'll have to investigate in source control to know for sure (is been a while ☺️).
- Ray On Mon., Jul. 20, 2020, 7:57 p.m. Eric Norman, <eric.d.nor...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ray, > > I don't see any substantive changes to the manifest between version 1.3 > and 1.4. The only differences I see in the manifest are the bundle version > numbers. > > I've now compared the released source 1.3 and 1.4 jar files and the only > difference is that the maven-shade-plugin was added to the pom.xml and the > copyright year was updated in the NOTICE file. But it doesn't appear that > the maven-shade-plugin actually changed anything in the released binary > file. > > Were you attempting to use the shade plugin to rename the javax.** > packages to jakarta.** in the output jar file? If so it doesn't look like > it worked at all. > > Also, was I looking in the right place for the JIRA tracking of > these geronimo-specs/** artifacts? > > Regards, > -Eric > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 6:26 AM Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com> > wrote: > >> It's an update to the OSGi metadata I do believe. So the only change is >> in the manifest.mf. >> >> - Ray >> >> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020, 16:27 Eric Norman, <enor...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> I see that a 1.4 version of geronimo-json_1.1_spec appears to have been >>> released on May 4, 2020. Can anyone provide any details about what this >>> release was about? >>> >>> The binary classes appear to be identical to the previously released 1.3 >>> version of the same. Also the JIRA version at [1] doesn't appear to have >>> been marked as released yet with the details about what was fixed or >>> changed in version 1.4. >>> >>> So I was wondering if this release was intentional and the 1.4 version >>> should be used going forward or if something else has happened here? >>> >>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO/versions/12346283 >>> >>> I'd appreciate any guidance you can provide. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Eric >>> >>
