So it appears the reason for the 1.4 release was to create a `jakarta` classifier [1].
:) - Ray [1] https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-json_1.1_spec/1.4/geronimo-json_1.1_spec-1.4-jakarta.jar On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 9:23 PM Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com> wrote: > Actually, I don't think I did that release. I'll have to investigate in > source control to know for sure (is been a while ☺️). > > - Ray > > On Mon., Jul. 20, 2020, 7:57 p.m. Eric Norman, <eric.d.nor...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Ray, >> >> I don't see any substantive changes to the manifest between version 1.3 >> and 1.4. The only differences I see in the manifest are the bundle version >> numbers. >> >> I've now compared the released source 1.3 and 1.4 jar files and the only >> difference is that the maven-shade-plugin was added to the pom.xml and the >> copyright year was updated in the NOTICE file. But it doesn't appear that >> the maven-shade-plugin actually changed anything in the released binary >> file. >> >> Were you attempting to use the shade plugin to rename the javax.** >> packages to jakarta.** in the output jar file? If so it doesn't look like >> it worked at all. >> >> Also, was I looking in the right place for the JIRA tracking of >> these geronimo-specs/** artifacts? >> >> Regards, >> -Eric >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 6:26 AM Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com> >> wrote: >> >>> It's an update to the OSGi metadata I do believe. So the only change is >>> in the manifest.mf. >>> >>> - Ray >>> >>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020, 16:27 Eric Norman, <enor...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> I see that a 1.4 version of geronimo-json_1.1_spec appears to have been >>>> released on May 4, 2020. Can anyone provide any details about what this >>>> release was about? >>>> >>>> The binary classes appear to be identical to the previously released >>>> 1.3 version of the same. Also the JIRA version at [1] doesn't appear to >>>> have been marked as released yet with the details about what was fixed or >>>> changed in version 1.4. >>>> >>>> So I was wondering if this release was intentional and the 1.4 version >>>> should be used going forward or if something else has happened here? >>>> >>>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO/versions/12346283 >>>> >>>> I'd appreciate any guidance you can provide. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Eric >>>> >>> -- *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> (@rotty3000) Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> (@Liferay)
