Oh, I see it now. So this was an intermediate step in support of migration to jakarta EE 9 then.
Apologies if this is covered somewhere that I could not find, but is there a roadmap for how the upcoming jakarta EE 9 release will impact the geronimo-spec-* projects going forward? Will the geronimo-spec-* artifacts be retired and everyone migrate to the equivalent artifacts from the eclipse ee4j project instead? Thanks and best regards, -Eric On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 7:50 AM Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com> wrote: > So it appears the reason for the 1.4 release was to create a `jakarta` > classifier [1]. > > :) > > - Ray > > [1] > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-json_1.1_spec/1.4/geronimo-json_1.1_spec-1.4-jakarta.jar > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 9:23 PM Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com> > wrote: > >> Actually, I don't think I did that release. I'll have to investigate in >> source control to know for sure (is been a while ☺️). >> >> - Ray >> >> On Mon., Jul. 20, 2020, 7:57 p.m. Eric Norman, <eric.d.nor...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Ray, >>> >>> I don't see any substantive changes to the manifest between version 1.3 >>> and 1.4. The only differences I see in the manifest are the bundle version >>> numbers. >>> >>> I've now compared the released source 1.3 and 1.4 jar files and the only >>> difference is that the maven-shade-plugin was added to the pom.xml and the >>> copyright year was updated in the NOTICE file. But it doesn't appear that >>> the maven-shade-plugin actually changed anything in the released binary >>> file. >>> >>> Were you attempting to use the shade plugin to rename the javax.** >>> packages to jakarta.** in the output jar file? If so it doesn't look like >>> it worked at all. >>> >>> Also, was I looking in the right place for the JIRA tracking of >>> these geronimo-specs/** artifacts? >>> >>> Regards, >>> -Eric >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 6:26 AM Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> It's an update to the OSGi metadata I do believe. So the only change is >>>> in the manifest.mf. >>>> >>>> - Ray >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020, 16:27 Eric Norman, <enor...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I see that a 1.4 version of geronimo-json_1.1_spec appears to have >>>>> been released on May 4, 2020. Can anyone provide any details about what >>>>> this release was about? >>>>> >>>>> The binary classes appear to be identical to the previously released >>>>> 1.3 version of the same. Also the JIRA version at [1] doesn't appear to >>>>> have been marked as released yet with the details about what was fixed or >>>>> changed in version 1.4. >>>>> >>>>> So I was wondering if this release was intentional and the 1.4 version >>>>> should be used going forward or if something else has happened here? >>>>> >>>>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO/versions/12346283 >>>>> >>>>> I'd appreciate any guidance you can provide. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Eric >>>>> >>>> > > -- > *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> > (@rotty3000) > Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> > (@Liferay) >
