On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:00 AM <p...@xvalheru.org> wrote: > - reads => as much as possible - huge stream of requests > - data => 186GB on each node > - the reads are unpredictable > - there's (in the cluster) about 6 billions of records >
I wonder though, if it makes sense to use Cassandra for a read-only dataset? Couldn't you just put it on something like Amazon S3 and be done with it? How many rows per partition do you have? Do you always scan full partition or you need to restrict results by clustering key? Regards, -- Alex
