More than a request filter, could you try to add a @Consumes annotation at class level to include that header in the methods that don't override it explicitly?
That would reduce the complexity too and remove the need for an additional filter. El 01/01/2014 17:07, "Andrew Phillips" <andr...@apache.org> escribió: > Thanks for your thoughts. As Andrew said, I think the much safer approach >> would be to handle this at the vcloud level. So, I've implemented a >> request >> filter for VCloudVersionsAsyncClient and it works fine. >> > > That sounds cool! Any chance you could submit this as a pull request, or > at least share the code diff so that we can fix this? > > Thanks! > > ap >