John Meyer wrote: > Scam links? Are you talking about URL shortening sites?
Tom-A-to, To-MAH-to. http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2009/08/25/short-url-spam-a-big-threat-in-august http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10281599-83.html http://unweary.com/2009/04/the-security-implications-of-url-shortening-services.html http://www.revenews.com/andrewwee/boom-in-url-shorteners-equals-boom-in-malware-and-spyware/ The real, non-scam site URL is rather short already, weighing in at 58 characters. http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2009122612211929 Again, the point of the Groklaw article is to request for assistance in sorting and cataloging the Comes v Microsoft material - scam urls and scam distros not withstanding. The digitization and publication of these court records, while maybe not interesting, is directly relevant to pretty much all aspects of OOo use, but especially regarding interoperability. /Lars > On 12/27/2009 11:19 AM, Lars Nooden wrote: >> Here is the correct link to the article, one that does not go to a scam >> site: >> >> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2009122612211929 >> >> It's not very smart to either send or follow the scam links nor to >> tolerate people that, for whatever reason, send scam links to a public >> mailing lists. >> >> The point of the Groklaw article is to ask for assistance in sorting and >> cataloging the many tens of thousands of pages of court evidence saved >> as court evidence for the trial Comes v Microsoft. Financial assistance >> helps, too. The recorded evidence documents as fact a lot of the >> intentional and apparently malicious efforts to hinder compatibility. >> >> /Lars --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.org
