On Mar 29, 2008, at 3:21 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
the AWL is keyed on email address and /16 of the sending IP
address, so
this may warrant more investigation. could you post the Received hdrs
from the spam that hit the AWL, and a ham that properly hits the AWL?
I still believe that self<->self would make a good exemption for AWL.
Sorry, I don't the original messages any more. (I looked) But it
wouldn't surprise me if the /16 matched. The mail I send myself is
usually from Wifi or my phone carrier's GSM network, but accepted via
SMTP AUTH on the local machine. So which address are you using?
Here's an example.
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.netconsonance.com ([unix socket])
by triceratops.netconsonance.com (Cyrus v2.3.9) with LMTPA;
Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:14:34 -0700
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.3
Received: from [10.178.18.103] (m4a0e36d0.tmodns.net [208.54.14.74])
(authenticated bits=0)
by mail.netconsonance.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m31KE4ui014296
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 13:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netconsonance.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.72
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.72 tagged_above=-999 required=3.8
tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.44, AWL=0.720]
From: "Jo Rhett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: test awl
Date: 01 Apr 2008 13:14:00 -0700
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: ChatterEmail+ for Treo 6xx/700p (3.0.8)
Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
from the cell phone of Jo Rhett
Network/Software Engineer
Network Consonance
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source
and other randomness
