On 9/2/2014 3:48 AM, Axb wrote:
On 09/02/2014 12:37 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I'm just saying that out of box it should catch more spam and assume
people will tolerate a few FPs. Because that is what I am seeing people
demand in the real world. This insistence that "if SA is responsible
for even ONE FP it's a disaster" is a drag on SA.
There is no such "insistence" - there's a target: deliver a framework
and a rule base which does a pretty good job on a global basis, from the
micro hoster in Bolivia, the school in Scotland to the guy hosting 500k
Plesk'd domains in some datacenter in Tampa.
SA is NOT and will never be a spam filtering service with zero hour
detection. It's a piece of software, a collectiong of tools, with a few
templates (rules)
Do you also rant at Microsoft because you expect MS-Word to write your
biography for you?
Apples and Oranges there, we are arguing over a fine point of
software that actually operates.
Ted
EOT
