On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:25:11AM -0500, Joshua Cude wrote: > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > Regardless of what is suggested as evidence, you will find a way to reject > > it. > > > > This is often stated, but of course it's nonsense. Who could reject a > phenomenon that replaces fossil fuels? That powers a car without refueling?
This is precisely my problem with claimed evidence for CF/LENR. If it's a giant effect, how come it's so conveniently elusive? I was extremely impressed with the original Fleischman-Pons paper back then and was about to run out to order some palladium wire and liberate a few cm^3 of heavy water from NMR solvent shelf but then was amazed when it turned out how sloppy the work was. How could Nature publish this? I kept watching the field since, and it's only gotten downhill. Some of the papers on LENR-CANR archive are just terrible beyond words. Of course I've tracked Rossi as well, starting with what his students wrote about him on reddit and the whole 78 pages of http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=198040 The gullibility of some posters here is truly astonishing.
