Or maybe the inventor was Puthoff.  I think the Puthoff measured the velocity 
of the projected gravity pulse at a velocity greater than the speed of light.  

At the report of that experiment I wondered if the expansion of the Universe 
could be related to the speed of the gravity pulse that, I think, was measured 
by Puthoff.  

It was Podkletnov that hooked up with NASA to investigate anti-gravity I 
believe.  

Bob Cook

From: Bob Cook 
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 11:33 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
Subject: [Vo]:Re: EM Drive(s)

The anti gravity devices that have been described, including those that can 
project gravity impulses at more than the speed of light, should not be 
forgotten.  I think its inventor was named Podkletnov.

From: Russ George 
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 10:00 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: EM Drive(s)

I believe that anyone with eyes and experience can see in the many EM drive 
reports the apparent evidence for the absence of emissions inside and outside 
of the microwave spectrum of the several EM drives that have been widely 
reported on. There is no joy in beating the fantasy strawman to death that 
presumes the researchers were nincompoops. (I acknowledge that there are some 
denizens inhabiting the ecology of atoms and the internet for whom such 
nincompoop presumptions is the reward, but no one here on Vortex-l is such a 
beast, right ;) The amount of apparent thrust and trend of thrust clearly 
demands something unknown about EM Drives and one does not so simply catch the 
unknown in nets of the known.  Perhaps on the 23 of March BBC Horizons will 
reveal more on its program on gravity including Shawyer and his EM drive. The 
pacing and paucity of research reports leaves one nearly breathless in 
anticipation.

 

From: Eric Walker [mailto:eric.wal...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 11:48 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: EM Drive(s)

 

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com> wrote:

 

  Well since most microwave leak detectors are actually pretty broadband rf 
detectors so most rf can be ruled out, no appreciable heating is seen so no ir, 
no visible light, no massive sound so no acoustic, live lab rats so no ionizing 
radiation, what’s left that might be made and detected???

 

Are you inferring that no radiation was observed outside of the microwave 
spectrum, or are you reporting a specific claim?

 

Eric

 

Reply via email to