IF and when IH pays Rossi the 89 million, what does IH get? IH gets the right to use Rossi's IP to produce and sell E Cat product in their territory granted by the Licence.
IH cannot use Rossi's IP for anything as its stands now. Can IH sell product that contains Rossi's IP that has been incorporated into the product line of other vendors such as Brillouin? How can Rossi identify his IP in the products of others that IH offers for sale? Can Rossi make an IP claim without that IP protected by a patent? Can IH claim that Rossi's IP does not work and yet use it in products produced by others connected to IH? If Rossi's IP is used in other products from other OEMs, does IH need to pay Rossi the 89 million? Does IH need to pay Rossi 5% of the value of the selling price of the produces from other vendors that include Rossi's IP in their products? On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > In his latest travesty of a blog, Peter Gluck wrote: > > "However I think his anger has a deeper cause- he is wanting or being >> pushed somehow to defend IH's very unnatural, surprising and implausible >> position so he has to tell difficultly believable things- he also does not >> know much about IH's real position , arguments and justifications. Do you >> agree, Jed?" > > > No, this is completely wrong in every respect, as I have pointed out many > times previously: > > No one is pushing me. > > There is nothing unnatural, implausible or unbelievable about I.H.'s > claim. Any person who understands calorimetry and examines the data will > agree with their analysis. If Rossi and Penon seriously believe there is 50 > times output they are both certified idiots (not just Penon). > > As I said, several times, I have seen some of the technical data from the > calorimetry. Based on that, I am sure I.H. is correct, and Rossi is wrong. > I have also seen independent verification of this data from sources outside > of I.H., so I am sure it is real. > > I know enough about I.H.'s "real position" regarding calorimetry to judge > this matter, although I look forward to learning more. I know nothing about > business arrangements or contracts. > > I have enough information to judge these things with confidence. You, on > the other hand, know nothing about them. All you have to go on are Rossi's > assertions from his blog. These range from nonsense to impossible. The > information he already released in the lawsuit rules out his claims. If the > reactor were producing as much heat as he claims, he and the others in the > building would be cooked. They would be dead. In fact, it is not producing > any excess heat. If and when I.H. becomes free to publish the technical > data, everyone will see this, and you will see that Rossi has been playing > you for a fool. > > - Jed > >
